Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 4599. (Read 26609287 times)

ungh, 56400 1 minute later

yiha, 56k on stamp
looking good

Explanation

Haah holy f... dude your good.

Fillipone showing us his levels

BTW, props to The Dude for mentioning "Squid Game" (south Korean series on Netflix).

Great series if you're into this kind of thing (watch trailer).

No way, man!

How do you do this?

I haven't been following Andreas for some time now, so I can't comment on his recent activity. He was partly (but significantly) the reason I got into Bitcoin, so I'm a bit biased in his favor I guess. I have both his books (on Bitcoin), but haven't got the chance to properly read them yet.

Thanks for your comments on this, I will browse through his recent talks and see what aftertaste I get. If what you're saying is true, it's sad that he has let his success overwhelm and change him for the worst. Regardless, I feel I owe him for triggering me to get into this space, and for this alone I will always be indebted to him.



Yeah, I also appreciate Bob's response to this. And yours. I think some people can be very complex and eccentric, and still be charismatic and great educators/contributors. Maybe Andreas falls into this category. He may sometimes be stubborn and eccentric and plain weird, but he still can (and does IMHO) contribute to the Bitcoin movement.

Explanation

This wall:



Is this exact enough?

You just can't see the forest for the trees..see @Syke post (the programmable aspect)..not much to add, but as Satoshi said:
“If you don't believe it or don't get it, I don't have the time to try to convince you, sorry.”

Explanation

It's not that simple.

Some addresses are attributable to several people and some people have several addresses.

Of course, the status quo richie are going to strive to hoard BTC to the extent that they find out about bitcoin while they are telling normies to NOT invest in BTC...

So sure in that regard HODLers and normies do need to protect their lil selfies by continuing to buy BTC and to accumulate BTC so that they are able to enjoy the ongoing price appreciation that is likely to continue to happen for the foreseeable future.


Actually, that is a fair point, Hueristic.

People can say all kinds of things about what they would do blah blah blah hypothetically, but when push comes to shove, and there is anticipation of panic (and a price drop) then people frequently will reconsider what they thought that they would do and end up doing something else.

Explanation

This should be a lesson to all newbies that even a modest ongoing BTC investment (accumulation) plan that involves DCA can put in you in a better position than either valuing your wealth in dollars or considering that even if you are using BTC on a regular basis (such as mining or providing some other BTC service or receiving BTC through selling goods), you are not going to be able to benefit in any kind of material and meaningful way from your historical involvement in BTC if you do not stack some of your nuts, like a squirrel... so in that regard, it should not matter if you are "required" to sell some of your BTC for fiat expenses.. blah blah blah.. you should still be cognizant of how much you are (or have been) stacking, too... and trying to maintain some kind of meaningful balance to at least attempt to approximate or simulate a kind of DCA strategy of some kind of level that is significant and above and beyond the stacking of zero sats.

For example, your forum registration is more than 9 years, so even the most modest of BTC DCA plans of $10 per week and $4,700 in total invested would have already put you at greater than $1 million in terms of spot BTC price with more than 23 BTC and a current value of nearly $1.3 million.

For sure with someone who had been engaged in mining, there would have had needed to have been some systematic holding back of some of the BTC - including at least $10 per week or perhaps even a bit more aggressively would have even been MOAR better than making sure that you fiat expenses were sufficiently covered.

Of course, I am not even really against $10 per week, but comparing modest DCA of even that kind of a level surely can serve as a kind of performance measure to compare what you are doing to what you might be doing in a kind of better case scenario, but many adults can be more aggressive than $10 per week.. that's for sure, and these days with the lower value of the dollar, perhaps $100 per week for any adult over 30 years old (and out of university) should be more than reachable.  

I do recognize and appreciate that some younger people do have tighter cash flows and may well not be able to afford to be more aggressive, even at $100 per week.. but I remember in the 80s and 90s, I had some investments that I was putting a couple hundred dollars a month into, even back then and even when my income was pretty damned low.., and sure we can appreciate that even those in poorer countries might have pretty tight cashflows too (even in terms of being able to get up to being able to afford $10 per week to stack away), so each of us just should be doing what we can in terms of trying to improve our lots for the future 4-10 years down the road or longer.. $10 per week is acceptable and something that we should attempt to strive for, even if we are poor, but these days it seems that $100 per week would be better (and maybe ONLY mediumly aggressive), if you (general public, joe blows, joe six-packs, normies, billybeerhodls, etc) can figure out a way to afford it.

wat wen satoshi REBOOT bitcoin? teeheehe

Well, the concern behind Satoshi moving his coins has always been less about his ability to move the market and more about possibly losing his anonymity and his hands-off approach and also the potential signalling of his confidence in Bitcoin. I'd say all three of these are much diminished compared to, 5-7 years ago though.

I was going to say something about your petty whiny little ass in terms of your Andreas criticism earlier, but I thought that I would just let it slide for the moment, even though I did recognize that there was no there there, beyond your being a jealous and petty weak-assed emotional cunt.  Probably you consider that a compliment.  hahahahaha.. you deranged attention-whoring dweeb.

#nohomo... or maybe #homo.. whatever...

 



I will agree that Andreas is a weird and emotional character.. and probably is way more comparable to ur lil selfie than to me.. and least in terms of some of his petty blocking of people and unable to take criticisms.

Andreas is a quite great historical and public contributor to the BTC space.. in a lot of ways.. and cannot deny him that even though he has several petty ways including probably being a bit more receptive to shitcoin pumpenings than would be preferable..but whatever, he does seem to have pretty high personal ethics, even if his behavior may end up having some questionable ethical ramifications in terms of either enabling other scammers or seeming to look the other way in terms of some important problematic areas that involve scamminess of some projects and people who likes based on what seems to be SWJ-like principles.


That's a bit exaggerated Bawb.    Andreas still has a lot of great redeeming qualities, even if some of us might not agree with him on some of his points or his ways of presenting some matters... and by the way, I doubt that he is less narcissistic than you... but whatever.. you are the one making the narcissistic accusation.. which seems a wee bit problematic for a guy with your history.. even when you erased a whole shit-ton of it.. which still does not mean that it did not happen.. for some of us who remember your seemingly never-ending quasi-nonsubstantive attention-whoring.


Good for you on the bitcoin maximalism issues, but not sure if you would be reliable in a pinch.. or in the trenches when shit is really going down.. but hey, each of us has to come to our judgements in terms of if we might want to get stuck in the trenches with nutjob 1, 2, or 3 and which might be the lesser of evils...


I cannot really disagree with this cAPSLOCK's way of framing the matter, because it seems to be less detached than Bawb's petty and emotional way of framing the matter.

I picked 20%

But in reality it is more likely I would buy the dip.

Well, the panic and stupidity of humans is something you can safely bet on. So I guess I would sell some just to have enough fiat to buy at a lower price. Still risky. But as long as I don't get greedy I think I could easily get a 10% bag increase...