Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 4734. (Read 26609996 times)
September 18, 2021, 03:20:56 PM
Don't have and won't have kids Marcus, try again.
September 18, 2021, 03:15:58 PM
The world is run by criminals with a license. That's why I do not understand when Bitcoiners scream at Banks, SEC, IWF etc. and then believe the WHO or CDC is any different. They all want to keep them self rich, no matter how. They do not give a shit about you and me and if we are healthy etc. The only goal of this was mass vaccination for profits. They installed and installing a vaccination system that will never end. You will need a booster shot every 6 months for the rest of your life. İf you do not get your booster, you get downgraded to unvaccinated status.
Oh no, I get a free vaccine shot.. these damn rich people just making themselves rich.
... just what is free about this? ... you're OK with your daughters and grand-daughters having fertility problems? ... your costs maybe beyond what you can comprehend
... why was menstrual cycle abnormalites never listed as a known side-effect for these vaccines while it was being widely-reported?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/didnt-doctors-listen-women-link-covid-vaccines-periods/
Quote
Why didn’t doctors listen to women about the link between Covid vaccines and periods?
A new study reveals that thousands of women experienced irregularities after their jab – yet the medical establishment seems disinterested
The possibility is looking increasingly likely. This week, a study in the BMJ revealed that almost 35,000 British women have reported that following their vaccination against Covid, they have experienced more painful and/or irregular periods. A month later, they were back to normal.
Dr Victoria Male, a lecturer in reproductive immunology at Imperial College London, who led the work, said that all the main vaccines - Pfizer, Moderna, AZ Oxford - were involved, but there has been no suggestion of a long-term impact on fertility.
Theorising that the body's immune response to the vaccine could trigger a change in the menstrual cycle, Dr Male pointed out that more research was needed.
This study is not the first we’ve heard of period disruption being linked to the jab. Ever since the vaccine roll-out began women have been all over social media, talking about how the vaccine seemed to have an impact on their menstrual cycle.
A new study reveals that thousands of women experienced irregularities after their jab – yet the medical establishment seems disinterested
The possibility is looking increasingly likely. This week, a study in the BMJ revealed that almost 35,000 British women have reported that following their vaccination against Covid, they have experienced more painful and/or irregular periods. A month later, they were back to normal.
Dr Victoria Male, a lecturer in reproductive immunology at Imperial College London, who led the work, said that all the main vaccines - Pfizer, Moderna, AZ Oxford - were involved, but there has been no suggestion of a long-term impact on fertility.
Theorising that the body's immune response to the vaccine could trigger a change in the menstrual cycle, Dr Male pointed out that more research was needed.
This study is not the first we’ve heard of period disruption being linked to the jab. Ever since the vaccine roll-out began women have been all over social media, talking about how the vaccine seemed to have an impact on their menstrual cycle.
... still developing, first it's just ignoring period irregularities, then there's a higher incidence of miscarriage and birth-defects, and spike in fertility treatment applications (big pharma wins again) ... I hope it doesn't play out like this but if you want to play God and experiment on the population we have laws against that, called the Nuremberg code about coercive medical experimentation, it's a crime against humanity
September 18, 2021, 03:03:43 PM
.... riddle me this?
... FDA just declined boosters approval for people under 65 because the risks outweighed the benefits ... b-b-b-but the vaccines are 100% safe (MSM lies)?!?! huh?
... FDA just declined boosters approval for people under 65 because the risks outweighed the benefits ... b-b-b-but the vaccines are 100% safe (MSM lies)?!?! huh?
September 18, 2021, 03:01:28 PM
September 18, 2021, 03:00:53 PM
Oh no, I get a free vaccine shot..
I don't want to sound brave or controversial, but how does it feel being a laboratory animal?
Lol. How does it feel being a self-righteous prick?
September 18, 2021, 02:43:55 PM
Wow. I would love to hear the other side of this one. But I do not see any holes in the victim's story. I hope the aggressor pays.
September 18, 2021, 02:37:17 PM
The post which I initially replied to. My "name-calling" was just and to be honest I wouldn't even consider it name calling. He calls me a lab rat and I call him a self-righteous prick, fair game and I am certain no feelings here were hurt except for yours.
You came in here. Took sarcastic no-substance shots at people who are dubious about the vaccine. Well, I take that back. You tried to make the argument that people were foolish to complain about the financial aspect of a "free" vaccine. Pfiser has made BILLIONS in revenue. In fact they themselves forecast they will make more than $3 for every human alive on Earth selling the vaccine (26 billion USD). Your argument is not only unsophisticated it is ignorant.
Bob did return a fairly simple rebuttal, but it had implicit substance. People taking the vaccine (like me) are taking unknown risks in doing so. That is a stone cold FACT. How does it feel? To be honest, I do not entirely like it.
The "arguments" you have made have had no real substance and can be summed up as "people who disagree with me are dumb" which is a dead giveaway that one is a fool.
Then again, I am too as I cast pearls here.
You are wrong about hurt feelings as well. Having hurt feelings would mean I felt attacked for a position about which I am insecure. Nothing you have said represents a valid attack, and I am reasonably secure in my positions, so my feeling cannot be hurt this way.
Coming in casting shade at WO people, libertarians (again people that are dumb because the disagree with you, I guess), and someone who I quite like (not just shade, but calling them a prick) does not hurt my feelings in any way, but it is offensive.
If I walk past a pile of shit, I am going to find the smell offensive, but it, like you, will not have hurt my feelings.
September 18, 2021, 02:28:08 PM
September 18, 2021, 02:25:05 PM
Lol. How does it feel being a self-righteous prick?
I'm merely stating fact.
You think that's informed consent you have?
Stating a fact or asking a question? They are two different things, Bob.
Again, what does it feel like being a self-righteous prick?
From my perspective Bob is not being a self righteous prick. But you really, REALLY are.
I personally have taken the vaccine two times. But I also have respect for people to CHOOSE NOT to take an experimental gene therapy that HAS NOT been studied to know all the possible downstream effects.
It is and entirely sensible position.
The actual INVENTOR of the mRNA therapy is on record saying over and over that this use of his invention could be dangerous.
If your brain is incapable of seeing the argument of someone you disagree with and instead call that person names then it is YOU, not them, who are in error in my opinion.
I do not like using the ignore button but this is getting very close.
It's easy. Simple minds use simple arguments
So simple they fly right over your head, apparently.
Lovely
You don't know nobody is able to insult me, right?
How unique you are!
I don't really take issue with your comments either, no panties in a bunch here
. Enjoy the rest of your Saturday!Yep, unique like everybody else.
I'll even enjoy the rest of my whole unimportant lil life.
Good riddance!
September 18, 2021, 02:24:42 PM
September 18, 2021, 02:20:29 PM
Lol. How does it feel being a self-righteous prick?
I'm merely stating fact.
You think that's informed consent you have?
Stating a fact or asking a question? They are two different things, Bob.
Again, what does it feel like being a self-righteous prick?
From my perspective Bob is not being a self righteous prick. But you really, REALLY are.
I personally have taken the vaccine two times. But I also have respect for people to CHOOSE NOT to take an experimental gene therapy that HAS NOT been studied to know all the possible downstream effects.
It is and entirely sensible position.
The actual INVENTOR of the mRNA therapy is on record saying over and over that this use of his invention could be dangerous.
If your brain is incapable of seeing the argument of someone you disagree with and instead call that person names then it is YOU, not them, who are in error in my opinion.
I do not like using the ignore button but this is getting very close.
It's easy. Simple minds use simple arguments
So simple they fly right over your head, apparently.
Lovely
You don't know nobody is able to insult me, right?
How unique you are!
I don't really take issue with your comments either, no panties in a bunch here
. Enjoy the rest of your Saturday! September 18, 2021, 02:18:46 PM
Lol. How does it feel being a self-righteous prick?
I'm merely stating fact.
You think that's informed consent you have?
Stating a fact or asking a question? They are two different things, Bob.
Again, what does it feel like being a self-righteous prick?
From my perspective Bob is not being a self righteous prick. But you really, REALLY are.
I personally have taken the vaccine two times. But I also have respect for people to CHOOSE NOT to take an experimental gene therapy that HAS NOT been studied to know all the possible downstream effects.
It is and entirely sensible position.
The actual INVENTOR of the mRNA therapy is on record saying over and over that this use of his invention could be dangerous.
If your brain is incapable of seeing the argument of someone you disagree with and instead call that person names then it is YOU, not them, who are in error in my opinion.
I do not like using the ignore button but this is getting very close.
It's easy. Simple minds use simple arguments
So simple they fly right over your head, apparently.
Lovely
You don't know nobody is able to insult me, right?
September 18, 2021, 02:15:43 PM
Lol. How does it feel being a self-righteous prick?
I'm merely stating fact.
You think that's informed consent you have?
Stating a fact or asking a question? They are two different things, Bob.
Again, what does it feel like being a self-righteous prick?
From my perspective Bob is not being a self righteous prick. But you really, REALLY are.
I personally have taken the vaccine two times. But I also have respect for people to CHOOSE NOT to take an experimental gene therapy that HAS NOT been studied to know all the possible downstream effects.
It is and entirely sensible position.
The actual INVENTOR of the mRNA therapy is on record saying over and over that this use of his invention could be dangerous.
If your brain is incapable of seeing the argument of someone you disagree with and instead call that person names then it is YOU, not them, who are in error in my opinion.
I do not like using the ignore button but this is getting very close.
It's easy. Simple minds use simple arguments
So simple they fly right over your head, apparently.
September 18, 2021, 02:14:22 PM
Lol. How does it feel being a self-righteous prick?
I'm merely stating fact.
You think that's informed consent you have?
Stating a fact or asking a question? They are two different things, Bob.
Again, what does it feel like being a self-righteous prick?
From my perspective Bob is not being a self righteous prick. But you really, REALLY are.
I personally have taken the vaccine two times. But I also have respect for people to CHOOSE NOT to take an experimental gene therapy that HAS NOT been studied to know all the possible downstream effects.
It is and entirely sensible position.
The actual INVENTOR of the mRNA therapy is on record saying over and over that this use of his invention could be dangerous.
If your brain is incapable of seeing the argument of someone you disagree with and instead call that person names then it is YOU, not them, who are in error in my opinion.
I do not like using the ignore button but this is getting very close.
Lmao, reading comprehension?? Haha, it's fine. I know how you WO only posters operate so couldn't care less if you'd put me on ignore.
My comment? Has reason and an actual argument. Yours? Basic name calling. What am I reading that I am not comprehending, please?
The post which I initially replied to. My "name-calling" was just and to be honest I wouldn't even consider it name calling. He calls me a lab rat and I call him a self-righteous prick, fair game and I am certain no feelings here were hurt except for yours.
September 18, 2021, 02:13:34 PM
Lol. How does it feel being a self-righteous prick?
I'm merely stating fact.
You think that's informed consent you have?
Stating a fact or asking a question? They are two different things, Bob.
Again, what does it feel like being a self-righteous prick?
From my perspective Bob is not being a self righteous prick. But you really, REALLY are.
I personally have taken the vaccine two times. But I also have respect for people to CHOOSE NOT to take an experimental gene therapy that HAS NOT been studied to know all the possible downstream effects.
It is and entirely sensible position.
The actual INVENTOR of the mRNA therapy is on record saying over and over that this use of his invention could be dangerous.
If your brain is incapable of seeing the argument of someone you disagree with and instead call that person names then it is YOU, not them, who are in error in my opinion.
I do not like using the ignore button but this is getting very close.
It's easy. Simple minds use simple arguments
September 18, 2021, 02:11:08 PM
Lol. How does it feel being a self-righteous prick?
I'm merely stating fact.
You think that's informed consent you have?
Stating a fact or asking a question? They are two different things, Bob.
Again, what does it feel like being a self-righteous prick?
From my perspective Bob is not being a self righteous prick. But you really, REALLY are.
I personally have taken the vaccine two times. But I also have respect for people to CHOOSE NOT to take an experimental gene therapy that HAS NOT been studied to know all the possible downstream effects.
It is and entirely sensible position.
The actual INVENTOR of the mRNA therapy is on record saying over and over that this use of his invention could be dangerous.
If your brain is incapable of seeing the argument of someone you disagree with and instead call that person names then it is YOU, not them, who are in error in my opinion.
I do not like using the ignore button but this is getting very close.
Lmao, reading comprehension?? Haha, it's fine. I know how you WO only posters operate so couldn't care less if you'd put me on ignore.
My comment? Has reason and an actual argument. Yours? Basic name calling. What am I reading that I am not comprehending, please?
September 18, 2021, 02:09:37 PM
Lol. How does it feel being a self-righteous prick?
I'm merely stating fact.
You think that's informed consent you have?
Stating a fact or asking a question? They are two different things, Bob.
Again, what does it feel like being a self-righteous prick?
From my perspective Bob is not being a self righteous prick. But you really, REALLY are.
I personally have taken the vaccine two times. But I also have respect for people to CHOOSE NOT to take an experimental gene therapy that HAS NOT been studied to know all the possible downstream effects.
It is and entirely sensible position.
The actual INVENTOR of the mRNA therapy is on record saying over and over that this use of his invention could be dangerous.
If your brain is incapable of seeing the argument of someone you disagree with and instead call that person names then it is YOU, not them, who are in error in my opinion.
I do not like using the ignore button but this is getting very close.
Lmao, reading comprehension?? Haha, it's fine. I know how you WO only posters operate so couldn't care less if you'd put me on ignore.
September 18, 2021, 02:07:38 PM
Ribeye, Med-Rare... Prime Rib, dab of horseradish... Ground Chuck, wrapped in Bacon...
Dude.. lose the rib eye (not the horse radish though ) and go with strip steak, cut extra thick, cooked in cast iron skillet on high heat to sear and create Maillard reaction. Medium rare.
Baked potato with sour cream, butter and chives, roasted head of broccoli with olive oil and infused garlic cloves...
Smoke a fatty and indulge. Its's one of life's simple pleasures. (in my book anyway...)
Personally, I'll take top blade (flatiron) over either ribeye or striploin any day, although I do eat all 3.
It's more tender and more flavorful than either. The only thing more tender than the flatiron (infraspinatus) is the tenderloin (psoas major) which is seriously lacking in flavor.
I also consider medium rare to be overcooked.
As for the beef itself, I prefer grain fed and barley finished Wagyu, Longhorn/Charolaise cross, Limousin, or Hereford, but Angus will do in a pinch.
It absolutely must be humanely harvested, preferably on-farm, and dry aged for 21 days. I think 21 days is the sweet spot. Too much fear in slaughterhouse beef. It affects the flavor.
True that. Neighbor farmer calls the slaughterer to come for a visit to the farm, to eliminate the fear factor.
However, worth to add, ageing introduces oxidation of saturated fats and in turn produces carcinogens. This is why red meat is considered to play a role in cancer development. I think you have to eat a lot of it for a long time, to really increase your chance of developing cancer, though.
September 18, 2021, 02:06:41 PM
Lol. How does it feel being a self-righteous prick?
I'm merely stating fact.
You think that's informed consent you have?
Stating a fact or asking a question? They are two different things, Bob.
Again, what does it feel like being a self-righteous prick?
From my perspective Bob is not being a self righteous prick. But you really, REALLY are.
I personally have taken the vaccine two times. But I also have respect for people to CHOOSE NOT to take an experimental gene therapy that HAS NOT been studied to know all the possible downstream effects.
It is and entirely sensible position.
The actual INVENTOR of the mRNA therapy is on record saying over and over that this use of his invention could be dangerous.
If your brain is incapable of seeing the argument of someone you disagree with and instead call that person names then it is YOU, not them, who are in error in my opinion.
I do not like using the ignore button but this is getting very close.
September 18, 2021, 02:04:02 PM
You should never talk to this place unless you have no opinion. The Wall Observers will firstly lower you down to their level and then beat you from experience.
Opinions are like assholes. We all got one and they all stink.
Except of course if you are an honorary Wob legend, in which case their opinion is valid and respected,
Quote from: HL Mencken
but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart.
**Apologies to HL Mencken for bastardizing his quote.....
Jump to: