The post which I initially replied to. My "name-calling" was just and to be honest I wouldn't even consider it name calling. He calls me a lab rat and I call him a self-righteous prick, fair game and I am certain no feelings here were hurt except for yours.
You came in here. Took sarcastic no-substance shots at people who are dubious about the vaccine. Well, I take that back. You tried to make the argument that people were foolish to complain about the financial aspect of a "free" vaccine. Pfiser has made BILLIONS in revenue. In fact they themselves forecast they will make more than $3 for every human alive on Earth selling the vaccine (26 billion USD). Your argument is not only unsophisticated it is ignorant.
Bob did return a fairly simple rebuttal, but it had implicit substance. People taking the vaccine (like me) are taking unknown risks in doing so. That is a stone cold FACT. How does it feel? To be honest, I do not entirely like it.
The "arguments" you have made have had no real substance and can be summed up as "people who disagree with me are dumb" which is a dead giveaway that one is a fool.
Then again, I am too as I cast pearls here.
You are wrong about hurt feelings as well. Having hurt feelings would mean I felt attacked for a position about which I am insecure. Nothing you have said represents a valid attack, and I am reasonably secure in my positions, so my feeling cannot be hurt this way.
Coming in casting shade at WO people, libertarians (again people that are dumb because the disagree with you, I guess), and someone who I quite like (not just shade, but calling them a prick) does not hurt my feelings in any way, but it is offensive.
If I walk past a pile of shit, I am going to find the smell offensive, but it, like you, will not have hurt my feelings.
