I have my doubts about if AlcoHoDL would be presenting the pyramid scheme as an educative framework to explain bitcoin, unless he were merely striving to contrast bitcoin with such scheme in some kind of way.
Perhaps AlcoHoDL could chime in on this point in terms of whether he would use a pyramid scheme framework to explain bitcoin, merely as a contrast or in some other way.. As I already mentioned, seems distracting and misleading in terms of costs versus benefits in using it rather than helpful from my point of view.
I think OOM may have tried to use the term "pyramid scheme" in a different way than what you're suggesting. In any case, I agree with your statements quoted above. I don't like pyramid schemes (such as AmWay, and many others), and would never associate Bitcoin with pyramid schemes in a discussion with newbies/nocoiners. If anything,
they are usually the ones who bring the pyramid scheme framework in the discussion, and falsely claim that Bitcoin is a pyramid scheme. In such cases, I try my best to explain/prove to them that Bitcoin is NOT a pyramid scheme, and is also NOT a Ponzi scheme (another term they often associate with Bitcoin). I try my best, but I fail miserably in most cases, it seems. They just don't get it, or they don't want to get it, or they think they get it and don't want to listen to me preaching to them about something they think they already know. Most of them seem to have already decided that Bitcoin is a scam...because the TV told them so.
I see your point. Let's move away from the pyramid thing, because it's an explanation only nocoiners tend to use, anyway.
[...]
I think OOM puts it quite nicely in his post above (which I snipped in the interest of readability). I think most people would treat anything as revolutionary as Bitcoin with a negative attitude. It's a natural reaction. I don't blame them. I just felt the need to "plant the seed" so to speak, and let it grow, or not. In most cases it dies. Maybe out of 30 people, one would buy a small amount of BTC, two would buy shitcoins because "Bitcoin is too expensive" and the rest would just dismiss it. Well, if you think about it, Bitcoin has shaken the foundations of a monetary system that all of us grew in and were brainwashed to trust and accept as the only way to handle monetary wealth. It's so deeply embedded in our brains that it's almost like a natural reaction, a millisecond response as OOM puts it.
"Bitcoin? Be your own bank? That can't be right! Surely it's a scam! Seed words? Is this some kind of word guessing game? What? Put my next month's paycheck in Bitcoin? Are you insane? And get what? QR codes?" That's more or less what I get. Or used to get. Because lately there is noticeably more interest in Bitcoin, and those who laughed and joked in 2015 are now asking seriously. My response now is "Google it". Not to punish them or anything, but because I just don't have the time and energy for this kind of thing anymore. After all, maybe that's the way it should be. Darwin, nature and all. Some will get it, some won't. That's life. I feel I did my part in spreading the word when I could, and I still do if I see really genuine interest.
I don't know... Being a Bitcoiner has been the best thing that's ever happened to me, certainly financially, but also psychologically. It's a weirdly satisfying, pleasantly powerful feeling that has got to be felt to be appreciated, as I'm sure many WOers would confirm. And I can't even begin to imagine how it will feel
5-6 4-8 years from now (a HoDLer can only count years in multiples of 4...)