I suppose that we could merely agree to disagree, no? I provided my explanation and examples through a hypothetical - which seems to have put the points that I was attempting to make into some contexts - including if, in the event that I may have overreacted, I attempted to back up my various points by describing various historical BTC price points and holding the quantity of BTC held at a constant.
Someone, lost in the mists of time, was lamenting the lack of ATH in May so, tongue-in-cheek, I suggested an ATH loss to fulfill their need.
Ok... Loss of an ATH for the month of May would be an interesting interpretation that would then suggest that the whole rabbit hole was a kind of miscommunication between WO thread peeps.
Furthermore, a post that mentions that there had been predictions of BTC having ATHs every month and then could be a ATH in May - in spite of the clock for May running out might not quite reach the level of actual lamenting, even if it could be read that way.
In fact, it's a loss which is bigger than what the actual ATH was at the beginning of the year.
ah ha. Factually speaking, I am pretty sure that I had made that point in some earlier posts, too. NOT even very surprising that a loss of 50% or more might reach seemingly high magnitudes, but still not end up being a shocking phenomena for either a long term HODLer or even someone who had already been psychologically and financially prepared for such potential volatility in an asset (namely king daddy) who is already known to have shocking levels of volatility from time to time and to have such shocking levels of volatility at times that would tend to have the effect of attempting to shock people. But merely because some peeps were shocked would not necessarily mean that all peeps were shocked, even if such shocking level of correction were to come during a bull run... which seems to be what happened.
That's pretty astounding that we got that high so quickly that that is possible in itself.
Actually going up 6.5x and then correcting 53%, should hardly be shocking at all - even if a lot of peeps had been talking about entering into supercycle status and imply that large corrections were going to be a thing of the past and also directly proclaiming that corrections of more than 30% were not even something that happens during a bullrun. And some people actually believed those kinds of bullshit proclamations to cause their lil selfies to be shocked where likely no shocking events had actually occurred - except for self-imposed limitations that they had put upon how far the BTC price was likely to correct overall or to correct during a bull market.. and then even ongoing dumbass proclamations that the bull market is over.. blah blah blah.
That a humorous (and factual) observation led to a wall of text is why I say you're touchy.
You should already know better than that, Richy_T wants to go pee...
Attributing causation with correlation remains an error of amateurs, and by now, you have been around the block (and even this thread) enough to NOT be an amateur, amiNOTrite?
You could say the word, "boo" and get what you would consider to be a "wall of text" from this here peep, so hardly anything worthy of suggesting "touchy" except for your own fantasy-landia reading into the matter.
There is really not a bigger point than an amusing (to me) observation
That also could be referred to as trolling, but glad that you are able to get your immature little pleasures so easily. and so much pleased and such wow to be of service to uie-poo-ie in that kind of way..
#nohomo so I'm afraid the rest of your wall is for nothing.
Think about all those trees that got chopped down for nothing.
that sucks.