Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 5730. (Read 26611302 times)

The problem with the stars is that they are currently unreachable.
Interestingly, such star purchase is described in the "Death end"-the 3rd book of the Liu Cixin trilogy.
The story auction (in the future) was 'official', but value relatively low because it was just a star.
Then, after it turned out....read the book  

re bitcoin vs dollar..there are many much weaker currencies that would probably be hit first, way before the dollar, see turkish lira, nigerian naira and argentinian peso.
Between just these three, it is 328 mil people, exactly the size of the whole US population.

Good work!

Along the lines of the NFTs, my dad registered a star for the family about 20 years ago. Guess how many billions of dollars that's worth now.

NFTs are pretty much the same thing. There are several private star registries. Sure, you can't own your favorite star in one registry so you can just go to the next registry and register it. Or you can create your own registry and own all of them. Same thing with NFTs. Someone can buy Elon Musk's first tweet on X blockchain and nobody on that blockchain can own that tweet. But they can go onto Y blockchain and buy that tweet. It's all a matter of consensus and wether or not people will all deem one blockchain as the place where the true NFTs reside. Otherwise will be many different ones and it will all become useless.

Most things in society are about consensus. That article a few pages back about yuppy elite business majors not understanding Bitcoin doesn't make sense to me. My thought about accountants and business majors all downplaying Bitcoin is the fact that they don't understand consensus. They are trying to dictate consensus. Even if they all think it's just Beanie Babies and there's no real value to it, would not the smart accountant see the Beanie Baby craze early on and understand that humans being what they are will start buying these things at a fast pace and try to profit from the window of opportunity that exists? My accountant poo pooed my support of Bitcoin back in 2010 as "a virtual currency backed by nothing? no thank you".

I learned during the dotcom boom about the difference between something that is superior vs something that people want. I was doing modeling and simulations of communications protocols. I was to compare these two protocols to determine which was the better routing protocol. I spent weeks constructing the models and simulating different scenarios and running the protocols through their paces. I determined that one was far superior. That was my first foray into investing, I put about $1000 into the company that had come up with the superior protocol figuring that once people realise how far superior it is in distributing data that the company would take off and I'd make a bit of money.

The reality is that the inferior protocol was adopted for whatever reason and I watched as my $1000 investment crashed to a few dollars that I pulled out about 2 years later.

So these accountants think that they know everything about money and believe that the dollar is far superior to Bitcoin so they believe that there is no way that the dollar would lose to Bitcoin. But the smart accountants should realise that it is the consensus of people and the choice of what people will use as their currency that matters. If they were truly intelligent they would take into account the large distrust people have of the government that is growing by the day, they'd see how the dollar is becoming shit, even if their religion tells them it is for the greater good, they'd see that this is a technology that people are very interested in and are starting to trust more than their government currency. If an accountant cannot see these externalities and just compares dollar to bitcoin, then they aren't that smart are they?

As far as NFTs, ICOs, etc. while the underlying premise may be wrong or flawed, if there is consensus behind something then it will certainly gain in value. I remember telling my brother to stay away from Ethereum when it was under $2. I still don't recommend ETH but I would have never guessed that it would have come this far back then.

And, March was such a terrible month, too...

Get a fucking grip peeps.. over nonsense theories... and figure out ways to accumulate and HODL long term rather than getting caught up in phoney baloney ideas.. reminds me of Jupiter9.. where is that dipwit with his dumbass global bodies ideas?  Probably whining some place without coins or a way too insignificant number of coins because he was buying into make believe shit rather than pursuing sound and prudent accumulation and HODL strategies.

Full story (low budget version)

Finally, a post that makes sense between all those covert NFT advertisements 

Please sir, can BTC go back to $60K?


Not tonight, mate.

Low quality homemade meme warning

Pump it like you mean it. 

Coinbase manipulating prices??? Seriously who should we trust now??


https://cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8369-21

---

Observing $59.2k again...

Some positive news too...

“JUST IN: Goldman Sachs to begin offering Bitcoin to its clients”
https://twitter.com/spectatorindex/status/1377239169085317129?s=21

He's probably make a great series of 42 minute shows for TV. I don't think the movie format is always appropriate for his ideas.

As soon as I heard websites were involved, that was red flags for me (and there were already more than a few). I'm still not fully conversant with them but the more I know, the more I don't want to know.

nah

Geez, so many twitter accounts join the #Bitcoin BTC movement (with the red laser eyes, of course)!


https://twitter.com/WhalePanda/status/1377289376347095045

hahaha i think now is the time infofront should make it mandatory to include tldr in every post longer then two lines and some users should not be allowed to post on WO without tldr.

I don't want to name any one but JayJuanGee  nullius  cAPSLOCK how are you guys?

Amazon probably meant 31st March in the USA. Which it wasn't yet.

Timezones won't be fixed but you can specify the timezone and GMT/UTC tends to be the standard if you don't have reason to use another.

NFT blablabla. I can't read it anymore. NFT my ###


go bitcoin, go!

I watched "Dark", but kind of get lost in the beginning of the last season (3)? Maybe I should finish it just for a sake of making ends meet.
I felt so sorry for one character there (Ullrich) that it was difficult to watch.

Well maybe, just maybe, the entire future of created arts will be blockchain-ified. Who knows.

I have collaborated with singers and musicians on music projects which are released on the likes of Spotify.

I just don't see a compelling case from the things I've read over the last week why I would go down this route at the moment rather than the avenues I have used in the past.
But sure, things can change.

To me it just seems like many people are using Bitcoin as a reason why every idea on a blockchain should work and be valued at a high price on its own.
It just sounds a bit wishful thinking perhaps. The amount of altcoins is ridiculous now. This can never work if you think about the number of them. Compare to the limited number of companies on stock exchanges.

At a certain time having your own blockchain might be as common as owning a video recording device.
In the past you could convince Doc Brown how amazing a movie studio that you can hold in your hand is.
These days no one gives a shit and there is more content created than can ever be consumed.

Also, Techie musician Imogen Heap looked at integrating music with blockchain for sales and events with Mycelia. I don't think it was a success at all. Frankly, it sounded like a complicated mess that eventually just became a music tour for a while.

Use this Netflix original website https://dark.netflix.io/en this is spoiler free and will help you to relate the characters and their relations.