Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 5731. (Read 26619966 times)

Finally, a post that makes sense between all those covert NFT advertisements 

Please sir, can BTC go back to $60K?


Not tonight, mate.

Low quality homemade meme warning

Pump it like you mean it. 

Coinbase manipulating prices??? Seriously who should we trust now??


https://cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8369-21

---

Observing $59.2k again...

Some positive news too...

“JUST IN: Goldman Sachs to begin offering Bitcoin to its clients”
https://twitter.com/spectatorindex/status/1377239169085317129?s=21

He's probably make a great series of 42 minute shows for TV. I don't think the movie format is always appropriate for his ideas.

As soon as I heard websites were involved, that was red flags for me (and there were already more than a few). I'm still not fully conversant with them but the more I know, the more I don't want to know.

nah

Geez, so many twitter accounts join the #Bitcoin BTC movement (with the red laser eyes, of course)!


https://twitter.com/WhalePanda/status/1377289376347095045

hahaha i think now is the time infofront should make it mandatory to include tldr in every post longer then two lines and some users should not be allowed to post on WO without tldr.

I don't want to name any one but JayJuanGee  nullius  cAPSLOCK how are you guys?

Amazon probably meant 31st March in the USA. Which it wasn't yet.

Timezones won't be fixed but you can specify the timezone and GMT/UTC tends to be the standard if you don't have reason to use another.

NFT blablabla. I can't read it anymore. NFT my ###


go bitcoin, go!

I watched "Dark", but kind of get lost in the beginning of the last season (3)? Maybe I should finish it just for a sake of making ends meet.
I felt so sorry for one character there (Ullrich) that it was difficult to watch.

Well maybe, just maybe, the entire future of created arts will be blockchain-ified. Who knows.

I have collaborated with singers and musicians on music projects which are released on the likes of Spotify.

I just don't see a compelling case from the things I've read over the last week why I would go down this route at the moment rather than the avenues I have used in the past.
But sure, things can change.

To me it just seems like many people are using Bitcoin as a reason why every idea on a blockchain should work and be valued at a high price on its own.
It just sounds a bit wishful thinking perhaps. The amount of altcoins is ridiculous now. This can never work if you think about the number of them. Compare to the limited number of companies on stock exchanges.

At a certain time having your own blockchain might be as common as owning a video recording device.
In the past you could convince Doc Brown how amazing a movie studio that you can hold in your hand is.
These days no one gives a shit and there is more content created than can ever be consumed.

Also, Techie musician Imogen Heap looked at integrating music with blockchain for sales and events with Mycelia. I don't think it was a success at all. Frankly, it sounded like a complicated mess that eventually just became a music tour for a while.

Use this Netflix original website https://dark.netflix.io/en this is spoiler free and will help you to relate the characters and their relations.

I am watching it. My opinion? Nice music, with that simple glissando string motif that's chilling enough in itself. A slow burner with much less tension than descriptions/posters suggest. The slow burner, low tension thing is good - but it's a bit too complicated for my taste. Keeping track of things acrually requires drawing trees, a bit like 100 años de soledad, but luckily here there are more than two-three given names (thanks for that!). The good thing is it should definitely end with Season 3: no aimless wandering or shark jumping in sight.

Physical enforcement as in "This physical work, authentic or not, present in this gallery/museum, can't be uncovered for all to see/moved from here etc., whithout a signature from the owner of this specific NFT". Who wants to "use" the object (watch, say) must get strong crypto auth before being legally able to.

Yes metadata is part of the work and is necessary to enforce ownership. It is not part of the creation itself, in the sense that the work can be used/enjoyed even if all metadata are removed. This is the rift I was referring to - between art as an esthetic experience that has value and art as a token whose ownership/accessory data are not necessary to enjoy a specific piece of art. Unless there is physical (legal?) enforcement, that is.

I am not being dismissive.

I fundamentally do not see a compelling use case for NFTs.

I am OK with being ignorant about NFTs, and fail to see the draw towards them.

Does not interest me in the slightest.

Memento, Inception, The Prestige, Interstellar and Batman are master pieces from Christopher Nolan. These are some movies we will debate on for hours.
I saw the trailer of Tenet seems amazing looks like mixture of Inception and The Matrix..

Btw do we have any Dark fans here on WO?

Whatever, dude or dudette, I am not selling you any or asking you to buy, but the overall dismissive attitude here is, frankly, bewildering to the n-th degree.
Reminds me of the attitude regarding bitcoin by the public at large several years ago.
Bitcoin developers/maintainers are making their own NFTs (on bitcoin side chain), yo.
EDIT: Correction. Although BMN (Blockstrem's mining thingie) is essentially an NFT, they choose to call it a Luxembourg investment contract (I guess because there are no NFT laws yet).