i give 10 merits if one can name me a working blockchain product. other than bitcoin. other than any ETH based erc20 scams or defi scams. i mean in the real world. it has been 12 years since the bitcoin white paper and more than 5 (how many exactly?) years that the "blockchain-not-bitcoin" narrative gets spun.
it took facebook 4 years to reach 1 billion customers.
it took the "blockchain industry" 4 years to develop zero products and therefore zero customers.
and no, BAT token does not count. no blockchain necessary there.
blockchain my ass.
nice title for a book.
Not contending for the price but the Internet wasn't invented at the 1995 level out of the blue. Bitcoin is only around since 2009. Implementing it in the
Interwebs and gaining wide acceptance is not a small feat. Especially when still being clunky and having to go against major established conventions and institutions.
I tend to look at it differently: the success of our clunky 7 tps Bitcoin proves how much dead wood there is to burn.
Imagine an
unlimited scaling secure decentralised open network for transactions. We have only seen the tip of the iceberg.
Something wrong with bitcoin? I did not realize that.
I think that when you are suggesting bitcoin to be clunky, you need to look at it as a package and to compare it to other systems in order to suggest that it is clunky compared with some other system.. and what is that system that you are comparing it to, exactly Wekkel?
In other words, fuck off with your implications that 7 tps is somehow inadequate given our current status of bitcoin and the various other objectives that it accomplishes in more important realms of empowered capacities for individuals to store and transport value without seeking permission - even if it might take more than 10 minutes to transact... you fuck.
i give 10 merits if one can name me a working blockchain product.
Filecoin.
@OP-Define 'working' first.
A blockchain could be working with not many customers.
Having customers is maybe more important than anything else.
The original question has a wholly dismissive attitude anyway.
You simply want to hear 'none', which is not
exactly the case.
i will check filecoin.
with working i mean a sellable product. that gets sold. that has customers. and yes, the attitude is dismissive because i suspect that blockchain is just a database structure and not a technology all by itself.
the sellable part should NOT be the token.
Yes.. .many (if not all) of the shitcoins work fine and dandy until they actually get some decent amount of traffic.. then we find out that they do not actually work in practice, even though they looked nice and lovely on paper.