https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/30/bitcoin-nears-27000-why-it-might-make-sense-to-give-some-to-charity.html
You hear that Average Joe? If you have too much Bitcoin, give it away or diversify now!
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 6422. (Read 26630597 times)
December 30, 2020, 10:00:46 AM
OT: So I guess the MSM's strategy of telling Average Joe to stay away from Bitcoin is not working, so now they're going with "[those that] have a portfolio that’s overweight in cryptocurrency may consider donating it to charity."
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/30/bitcoin-nears-27000-why-it-might-make-sense-to-give-some-to-charity.html
You hear that Average Joe? If you have too much Bitcoin, give it away or diversify now!
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/30/bitcoin-nears-27000-why-it-might-make-sense-to-give-some-to-charity.html
You hear that Average Joe? If you have too much Bitcoin, give it away or diversify now!
December 30, 2020, 09:43:26 AM
Is it time yet to put page count parity behind us, just as gold ounce parity was put to rest years ago?
Old article from gold ounce parity days (3/3/2017):
http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/39154348/i-bought-bitcoins-in-2011---now-theyre-worth-19000
This guy gets it:
Quote
"It's a trade of freedom to have your own money, as opposed to taking your money and putting it in a bank that might crash."
December 30, 2020, 09:31:58 AM
I have heard you admit, on several occasions, that you did not buy enough..
Any man who claims he bought enough is a liar
Those who knows BTC from 2016-2017 and claiming not bought enough with the cash they hold or could have available.... they are not BTC worthy....
I remember many occasions, for example an uncle of me... BTC pumps to 1400-1600-ish and he said if it drops back to 900-ish then I’m gonna buy (thinking he was to late @1400-1600)
Of-course the price did drop to those 900’s maybe bit lower cannot remember exactly ....
But naturally he didn’t bought... those aren’t BTC worthy cause they fail to understand the fundamentals and the UP potential, they also only see $-€ marks and nothing else...
This one is lucky he did bought around 3500-ish ....
In 2013 I told a co-worker to just buy a little BTC at $800 and hodl it forever....he never did.
Also told a former tax accountant that same year that I had invested in BTC, he told me that "Bitcoin is a scam, dump it all immediately and get into traditional investments." I didn't of course, and essentially fired him. If I had followed his advice, I wouldn't be retired and wealthy today. I have since moved away from where he lives, but still have an occasional thought to call him up and give him an ear full. I'm sure that to this day he has never bought any BTC, and he is probably still dispensing bad advice to his clients.
December 30, 2020, 09:31:10 AM
December 30, 2020, 09:27:46 AM
Is it time yet to put page count parity behind us, just as gold ounce parity was put to rest years ago?
Old article from gold ounce parity days (3/3/2017):
http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/39154348/i-bought-bitcoins-in-2011---now-theyre-worth-19000
December 30, 2020, 09:26:46 AM
Rat poison
He was right, Bitcoin IS rat poison, for bankers and the FED. He speaks poorly of it because the concept breaks a monopoly he is fond of.
I have always seen it this way. They understood what it was foundationally very early on, and also did not believe it would succeed. Still don't I imagine.
December 30, 2020, 09:15:28 AM
I think the r0ach might be gone for good. It doesn't make me happy though.
Maybe he was just trolling us with his right-wing bullshit, wasn't really a no-coiner, and was secretly accumulating a massive Bitcoin stash.
Maybe he's retired to a life of Lambos, hookers, and blow.
I always thought he was just trolling. I even suspected he's a cultivated jew. He used to know and understand way too much to be the typical right-wing extremist he appeared to be. However, deep in my heart I suspect lambos, hookers and blow are not where he's at right now.
December 30, 2020, 09:07:04 AM
I think that fourth law that R Daneel came up with all by himself (protect humanity) is a bit too PC for my taste but it works well in the books.
I have to reread those books. Isn't R Daneel the emperors gardener or something on Trantor?
I have to reread those books. Isn't R Daneel the emperors gardener or something on Trantor?
the zeroth law? it did work out in the series.
cant remember if R Daneel was the gardener though, thought he was an adviser of some sort.
time to re read some stuff. got a bit of a backlog right now.
December 30, 2020, 09:00:29 AM
Maybe his mum got the internet cut off
December 30, 2020, 08:54:22 AM
I think the r0ach might be gone for good. It doesn't make me happy though.
Maybe he was just trolling us with his right-wing bullshit, wasn't really a no-coiner, and was secretly accumulating a massive Bitcoin stash.
Maybe he's retired to a life of Lambos, hookers, and blow.
December 30, 2020, 08:54:01 AM
Hm. Has someone checked in on Proudhon? Just want to make sure they're ok.
Btc people what a community still concerning for those who actually doesn’t deserve
December 30, 2020, 08:51:40 AM
Hm. Has someone checked in on Proudhon? Just want to make sure they're ok.
December 30, 2020, 08:51:28 AM
28
December 30, 2020, 08:48:02 AM
That's what I said. Put an "innocent bystander" (e.g., a harmless pregnant woman) on the front and attack from the back. Robot can't react.
I don't get it, why should a robot not defend itself against a pregnant woman?
And the innocent fetus could be counted too, depending on point of view, advancement of pregnancy, and other parameters. Let's not go there now.
That sounds like Roach!
The regular print or the small one?
BTW, I think the r0ach might be gone for good. It doesn't make me happy though.
December 30, 2020, 08:38:07 AM
Good morning Bitcoinland.
Back in the groove again. Another ATH ($28600 Stamp) and a nice little mini-correction to keep things honest... currently $27940USD/$35716CAD (Bitcoinaverage).
Its still not too late to hit $30k this year.
Go Bitcoin go.
Female lives matter.
Back in the groove again. Another ATH ($28600 Stamp) and a nice little mini-correction to keep things honest... currently $27940USD/$35716CAD (Bitcoinaverage).
Its still not too late to hit $30k this year.
Go Bitcoin go.
Women are humans too.
Female lives matter.
December 30, 2020, 08:33:44 AM
That's what I said. Put an "innocent bystander" (e.g., a harmless pregnant woman) on the front and attack from the back. Robot can't react.
I don't get it, why should a robot not defend itself against a pregnant woman?
And the innocent fetus could be counted too, depending on point of view, advancement of pregnancy, and other parameters. Let's not go there now.
That sounds like Roach!
December 30, 2020, 08:19:18 AM
That's what I said. Put an "innocent bystander" (e.g., a harmless pregnant woman) on the front and attack from the back. Robot can't react.
I don't get it, why should a robot not defend itself against a pregnant woman?
And the innocent fetus could be counted too, depending on point of view, advancement of pregnancy, and other parameters. Let's not go there now.
December 30, 2020, 08:15:05 AM
Thanks for this!
I can't get enough of it. I just can't help but stand in awe of this amazing achievement. Just imagine what they'll be able to do in 10, 20 years.
they will be soldiers and cops. one of those enough to control a small town. imagine the battles. imagine the riots. scary as shit.
As a scientist and engineer, I stand rapt in awe of the achievement. I do not judge its uses. It could be used for good or bad things. It's the humans who are at fault if they decide to use it for bad things. And they probably will. As humans do with everything.
December 30, 2020, 08:13:00 AM
That's what I said. Put an "innocent bystander" (e.g., a harmless pregnant woman) on the front and attack from the back. Robot can't react.
I don't get it, why should a robot not defend itself against a pregnant woman?
December 30, 2020, 08:12:39 AM
Directive 4 = Classified
Jump to: