Make as many bets as you'd like, just not the same bet_type,bet,wager,date. Even hedging your bets with opposite positions is allowed.
I am not sure if I understand this, because there could be rules that say that you cannot bet more than one of the categories, but if you are going to hedge, you might bet within the same category. Sometimes I get confused about a potential dilutive effect of hedging, but it might not necessarily be a problem, but still you might want to have some limits such as 2 bets per category per user per day.. or some variation of that.
And if someone loses his whole bank of fictional WO merits (maybe the WO merits should be called something else - like bet merits or WO bet merits? - WO BMs, for short.. hahahahahaha.. if you know what BM might mean?), then maybe there could be a way to earn them back.. but you would not want them to be too easily available.. so maybe it could be something quite conservative, like the activity points.. 1 per day as long as your balance is lower than 100 or something like that... which would mean that the most you could earn back would be 100.. but then that might cause participants not to fear going to zero since they could just earn them back 1 WO merit at a time per day.. .. I don't know.. I am not that attached to the earn back idea.
EDIT: JayJuanGee, your bet snuck in before the new format applied.
No problem.. Here, I just added the date to my already "wise" projection of UP.
WOGame,JayJuanGee,updown,up,100.2024-05-13
ETFs made bitcoin "boring" for now?
Is bitcoin now a 30-50% per year asset rather than 100-150%?
It's hardly a complaint, but I wonder if it really "changed".
I certainly do not feel that FOMO is out there, despite all the bullish fundamentals.
Oh gawd, Biodom.. .
Why do you have a tendency towards prematurity?
I don't see how investment vehicles that cause more avenues to get into bitcoin is going to cause BTC prices to go up less per year, especially when they are settled in BTC.. Now if they were settled in dollars, that would be another matter. Yeah retail buyers have to use dollars to buy and sell BTC, but the ETFs have to back up those buys with actual BTC.. they cannot fake it..
Now if somehow the ETFs are faking the BTC that are backing up the shares that they are selling, then that might be a different story, but we do not have evidence of their faking the BTC perhaps beyond the delayed time in which they might have to make sure that they have the quantity of BTC that the shares reflect.. so sure there could be days involved with the making sure that they have the cornz that they claim to have, but it is not fractional reserve system, as far as I understand the situation to be.
Regarding your overall concern. Did you realize that BTC prices do not just go straight up at all times?
Did you realize that if we use the March 13 ($73,794) top, then BTC prices went up nearly 5x since November 2022? and also nearly than 3x since October 2023?.. .
yeah, yeah, yeah, they corrected back down 23.5% to $56,500.. but even right now as I type this post, we are not at $56,500, we are at $61,111 which is around 8% higher than $56,500 and sure it is still around 17% lower than $73,794, but who cares? You should already recognize and appreciate that these kinds of corrections are not unusual in bitcoinlandia, and surely we mayw well even consider BTC price actions to be quite ongoingly good since we have been having a lot of ongoing attacks on bitcoin self-custody and related hostilities, so the BTC price continues to do quite well in spite of these kinds of ongoing hostilities - which might cause some of us to hope that some of the attacks might cause some Streisand effects (but that might be too wishful in my own thinking?).