Now, back to Bitcoin.
Can you not see where it's goin'?
There's still time to join!
This is what I've been wanting to here!
I will start buying from now on, I did buy some bitcoin but I don't have enough capital but as little as I can buy I will keep buying as you said there is still time.
Well, if you are thinking about buying bitcoin for 4-10 years or longer, then even if you don't have a lot of capital, you are still going to be ahead of a lot of the scared cats and/or the folks who are failing/refusing to take actions. So there likely are going to continue to be people who are just coming into bitcoin through the years, and to the extent that you are able, then you should be glad to have had spent time stacking sats prior to the around 99% of the world's population who have failed/refused to stack sats.. and they will likely have to get started later, perhaps after you have already been engaged in such stacking for several years prior to them.
So, yeah, in the end, each of us our responsible for our own levels of stacking and/or failure/refusal to stack in some cases.
Betting results:
greyhats won 729, now has 1829| JayJuanGee won 133, now has 1233| DirtyKeyboard won 100, now has 1200
Bet Examples:
WOGame,User Name,updown,up,1000
WOGame,username,evenodd,odd,300
WOGame,UserName,exact,69420,500
I am not sure if the thread might become too cluttered, since there is not a new thread for this. Are you going to publish a table of the betters once a day?
WOGame,JayJuanGee,updown,up,100
No one is talking clutter yet, but I'm listening.
It could be an on topic thread in the Speculations board? If there was to be a table, it could be in a #code box to limit the size.
Only one (bet_type, bet) combination per user per day, BTW
I suppose will see how it plays out, since one of the issues could be that if you talk about the various rules, then we might need a spot to reference back to (which usually would be OP). So in this case, would there be one post that has all of the rules, so maybe like CB's explanation there could be a link to the rules, each time that you post the results that is contained in the post.. and so even if you add or subtract rules, then there would be a way to refer back to them.
I am again wondering how your script is going to differentiate earlier dates, so if I am citing myself, then does that mean that I am placing the same bet.. and maybe it would be good that we would have to put the date in there....
You said that we started with 1,000 WO merits, and if I won 133 then why would I have 1,233? rather than 1,133? There seems to be something wrong with the maths.
Below is my new bet (wish me luck... 50/50-ish.. and maybe with a slight tinge of possible favoritism in my own theory.. in the ballpark of 55/45).. and I feel like I should be placing the date inside of my bet to distinguish this bet from my prior one, since you are not going to stop folks from citing themselves or citing the bets of others... but what do I know?
WOGame,JayJuanGee,updown,up,100
By the way, I was kind of wondering about being able to bet on all three bet types at once. but you settled that unanswered matter.