Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 8743.

bitserve

legendary

Activity: 1862

Merit: 1530

Self made HODLER ✓

Quote from: P_Shep on December 20, 2019, 07:46:44 PM

Quote from: bitserve on December 20, 2019, 04:51:36 PM

Please everyone here support my motion to put up a poll to end that nonsense already: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53399096

It's been too long already and we need to turn the page and go on to serious business.

Options:

1- Earth is flat
2- Earth is NON-flat
3- Notbatman is retarded, but earth is indeed flat
4- All of the above.
5- $9K (Vegeta time)
6- weee weeeeeeeeeeeee

Imagine, if you will, the world was a cube.
If you walked towards the corners, it would feel like you're continually walking up an ever steepening hill.

Though that does require you to accept gravity as being a singularity...

ehh

uhmmmm

6- weee weeeeeeeeeeeee ?

P_Shep

legendary

Activity: 1795

Merit: 1208

This is not OK.

Quote from: bitserve on December 20, 2019, 04:51:36 PM

Please everyone here support my motion to put up a poll to end that nonsense already: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53399096

It's been too long already and we need to turn the page and go on to serious business.

Options:

1- Earth is flat
2- Earth is NON-flat
3- Notbatman is retarded, but earth is indeed flat
4- All of the above.
5- $9K (Vegeta time)
6- weee weeeeeeeeeeeee

Imagine, if you will, the world was a cube.
If you walked towards the corners, it would feel like you're continually walking up an ever steepening hill.

Though that does require you to accept gravity as being a singularity...

dragonvslinux

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 2213

I feel like I'm getting deja vu now. It could just be due to alcohol, but what if $6,430 was the low? I remember when $3,130 didn't look like the low either. It also looked like we'd probably go lower, due to the technicals. Now $6,430 doesn't look like the bottom as well. Maybe we don't get obviously defined bottom, yet again.

I've said it multiple times, I think we're going lower, to the $5k area, but that also this could actually be the bottom.

P_Shep

legendary

Activity: 1795

Merit: 1208

This is not OK.

bitserve

legendary

Activity: 1862

Merit: 1530

Self made HODLER ✓

Quote from: d_eddie on December 20, 2019, 07:06:56 PM

I'm sorry guys. What was I thinking?
Embarrassed

You clearly were NOT thinking Undecided

d_eddie

legendary

Activity: 2520

Merit: 3038

I'm sorry guys. What was I thinking?
Embarrassed

JayJuanGee

legendary

Activity: 3948

Merit: 11416

Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

d_eddie

legendary

Activity: 2520

Merit: 3038

bitserve

legendary

Activity: 1862

Merit: 1530

Self made HODLER ✓

Quote from: makrospex on December 20, 2019, 05:26:04 PM

Quote from: bitserve on December 20, 2019, 05:12:43 PM

Quote from: makrospex on December 20, 2019, 05:02:03 PM

Quote from: bitserve on December 20, 2019, 04:51:36 PM

Please everyone here support my motion to put up a poll to end that nonsense already: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53399096

It's been too long already and we need to turn the page and go on to serious business.

Options:

1- Earth is flat
2- Earth is NON-flat
3- Notbatman is retarded, but earth is flat
4- All of the above.
5- $9K (Vegeta time)
6- weee weeeeeeeeeeeee

I did, kinda...

Quote from: makrospex on December 20, 2019, 04:59:47 PM

I can prove the existence of a flat earth:

Et tu, makrospex?

If you read a lil further:

Quote

It is hanging on my living room's wall, above the public viewing display.

Otherwise, certainly option 2.
If i could do multiple choice, it's 2,5,6 Grin

Please vote accordingly then: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53399555

JayJuanGee

legendary

Activity: 3948

Merit: 11416

Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

Quote from: d_eddie on December 20, 2019, 02:16:00 PM

xhomerx10, you're a gentleman and I wasn't targeting you in particular with my small rant - rather, I was thinking of some other very nasty guy who apparently has the nerve to suggest I get a pair of glasses. We're beyond glasses here: at such minuscule sizes I'm hitting subpixel resolution issues! Angry

People sometimes ask whether other people have a problem or whether they have a problem.

In this case, you are the one with the problem. Sorry to be the only person frank enough to tell the truth and to break the news. Cry

Everyone else ("we" (royal)) doesn't have no problems with this issue. In other words, no one else complained. (except just a few peeps here and there)

Quote from: bitserve on December 20, 2019, 02:25:44 PM

You are right, they are all assholes for doing that as if we haven't better things to do than having to quote a post just to read it

It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.

Testing:
It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.It would be funny/strange/maybe more efficient in the whole scheme of things to have a BIG wall of text, and hardly even take up the size of an ordinary post.

hv_

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale

Quote from: Wekkel on December 20, 2019, 06:14:17 PM

The Mandalorian: Great Series. Recommended.

The Mandala network, great model for Bitcoin in graph theory

https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.7259

Grin

BayAreaCoins

legendary

Activity: 4018

Merit: 1250

Owner at AltQuick.com

I'd imagine Bitcoin prices are going to dip with people shopping and needing fiat for the Holidays.

Bitcoin seems like something you spend, not something you give. For most folks anyways.

Wekkel

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1538

yes

The Mandalorian: Great Series. Recommended.

makrospex

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 317

nothing to see here

Quote from: bitserve on December 20, 2019, 05:12:43 PM

Quote from: makrospex on December 20, 2019, 05:02:03 PM

Quote from: bitserve on December 20, 2019, 04:51:36 PM

Please everyone here support my motion to put up a poll to end that nonsense already: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53399096

It's been too long already and we need to turn the page and go on to serious business.

Options:

1- Earth is flat
2- Earth is NON-flat
3- Notbatman is retarded, but earth is flat
4- All of the above.
5- $9K (Vegeta time)
6- weee weeeeeeeeeeeee

I did, kinda...

Quote from: makrospex on December 20, 2019, 04:59:47 PM

I can prove the existence of a flat earth:

Et tu, makrospex?

If you read a lil further:

Quote

It is hanging on my living room's wall, above the public viewing display.

Otherwise, certainly option 2.
If i could do multiple choice, it's 2,5,6 Grin

El duderino_

legendary

Activity: 2744

Merit: 13618

BTC + Crossfit, living life.

Quote from: Paashaas on December 20, 2019, 02:56:51 PM

Quote from: Searing on December 20, 2019, 01:30:22 PM

Quote from: Paashaas on December 20, 2019, 12:06:08 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Caught "The Rise of Skywalker" last night with Rick. It was like watching two and a half hours of shit being smeared all over my eyes.

I get more excited watching The Mandalorian E7 tonight at home than The Rise of Skywalker in the cinema.

Truth. The story 'arc' with some tightening up on some stuff to make it a 2-hour movie would, IMHO, have done a lot better than the last 2 star wars movies

just saying. Not sure it was worth the $69 a year price I paid, I can find NOTHING of any real note on the site to watch besides the Mandrian...thus a loss of $$$.

Have the exact same problem with CBS Access and Star TreK: Discovery as well. Sh*t. Well at least with Picard that will be 2 shows I can watch on the CBS Access

site. It is like commercial T.V. is not even trying anymore to make quality products, only if you subscribe can you see anything good now it seems.

Mandalorian season 1 contains 8 episodes to watch, last one will be aired 27 Dec. Season 2 next year, al lot of countries still waiting for Disney+.

It was not needed to sub for 12 months if you only want to follow The Mandalorian, cancel Disney+ sub after episode 8 and resub when season 2 starts. I could've taken the advantage trying Disney+ for 1 week and watch season 1 in one go on a sunday evening for just 1 cent. -lol-

There are so many streaming services these days, each one which there own originals just like the newest Star Trek: Picard on CBS. (release date is January 23) Subscribe when the season starts and unsub when it ends, so you can replace service A to B. This is what i always do.

On the side note, The Mandalorian is already so succesfull that Disney considering the possibility of a Mandalorian movie. It would be something if it gets more populair than the original Star Wars movies.

Still didn’t saw the Mandalorian, just waiting when all episodes are there.... I have one -point and that is I like it when episodes are longer like at least 50+ minutes....

bitserve

legendary

Activity: 1862

Merit: 1530

Self made HODLER ✓

Quote from: makrospex on December 20, 2019, 05:02:03 PM

Quote from: bitserve on December 20, 2019, 04:51:36 PM

Please everyone here support my motion to put up a poll to end that nonsense already: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53399096

It's been too long already and we need to turn the page and go on to serious business.

Options:

1- Earth is flat
2- Earth is NON-flat
3- Notbatman is retarded, but earth is flat
4- All of the above.
5- $9K (Vegeta time)
6- weee weeeeeeeeeeeee

I did, kinda...

Quote from: makrospex on December 20, 2019, 04:59:47 PM

I can prove the existence of a flat earth:

Et tu, makrospex?

lightfoot

legendary

Activity: 3220

Merit: 2334

I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)

Quote from: Cryptotourist on December 20, 2019, 04:19:57 PM

Flat Earth! Grin

People are hopeless. The Earth is *not* flat.

The Earth is hollow.

makrospex

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 317

nothing to see here

Quote from: bitserve on December 20, 2019, 04:51:36 PM

Please everyone here support my motion to put up a poll to end that nonsense already: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53399096

It's been too long already and we need to turn the page and go on to serious business.

Options:

1- Earth is flat
2- Earth is NON-flat
3- Notbatman is retarded, but earth is flat
4- All of the above.
5- $9K (Vegeta time)
6- weee weeeeeeeeeeeee

I did, kinda...

bitserve

legendary

Activity: 1862

Merit: 1530

Self made HODLER ✓

Please everyone here support my motion to put up a poll to end that nonsense already: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53399096

It's been too long already and we need to turn the page and go on to serious business.

Options:

1- Earth is flat
2- Earth is NON-flat
3- Notbatman is retarded, but earth is indeed flat
4- All of the above.
5- $9K (Vegeta time)
6- weee weeeeeeeeeeeee

P_Shep

legendary

Activity: 1795

Merit: 1208

This is not OK.

Roach and notbatman would make beautiful babies.

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 8743. (Read 26656635 times)