Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9094. (Read 26717410 times)

Most of those lines are gobbledy gook to me, and when I said get out there and trade I was suggesting that you follow your own system, whatever that may be.

My system hardly ever makes any changes based on my anticipations of BTC price direction, which is good for me, because I rarely, if ever have much of any kind of anticipation of BTC's short-term price direction that would take me more than 5% or so off of my usual 50/50 disposition.

I considered it a black swan event, Faketoshi claimed that once he gives Kleiman the coins he'll have to dump a big chunk of them just to cover taxes All appears just to be another lie on his way to becoming irrelevant, wanted to hear BSv shills comment on it so i summoned you, great bear/BSv supporter.

But if even you can't put a positive spin on this

Well, you _could_ have just verified the information yourself instead of throwing the ball back to the non-SV crowd.

Apparently the maximum amount he could have possibly "lost" was less than 0.1 BTC (if he wasn't making up everything):

https://twitter.com/rusty_twit/status/1187995784957947904?s=20
https://twitter.com/rusty_twit/status/1189678498337574912
https://bitcoinist.com/4-bitcoin-loss-on-lightning-network-is-fud-says-community/

I still have the same. I tried to read back the pages but not much
May be we need JSRAW 🤪

You're right it's possible for me to get r3kt™️, probably from fakeouts where I was in the right short trade but got tapped out at a loss prior to my hodl position continuing to lose money after I've lost my hedge. When it comes to bull traps I generally try and avoid them, as if I'm already 85-90% long, I don't want to increase my risk. It's worth considering though.

This probably explains my natural trading bias to some degree, maybe my TA requires a disclaimer because of it. But ultimately I apologize for being the pessimistic bull, that by your standard deserves to get rekt™️, but so far hasn't and is otherwise unlikely to happen due to position sizing, risk management and generally avoiding bull traps. The only way I will get truely rekt™️, is if BTC goes below $4K. Then I iz a r3kt™️ moonboy like any other post-2017 moonboy hopes and dreams getting r3kt™️ r3kt™️ r3kt™️.

To let you down even more, I won't be going out there to trade any satoshis, I'm avoiding buying resistance that's a big open space of bull trap, as well as avoiding any foolish bear traps wicking under the 200 Day MA. I'm remaining neutral, believe it or not. Even if I'll retain my bearish bias regardless of lack of confirmation.

Just got a new job to start dollar-cost averaging though, hope that makes you feel better.

My bad, I'm waiting for confirmation, but planning to short the bullish broadening wedge with a tight stop loss if that's ok with you?
If you could confirm within the next 96 minutes before the close it'd be appreciated  
I drew this chart just for you. To show you that we're in a bullish pattern, but I still want to short it  



I'll long again at the 200 Day MA (the support trend-line) I promise 

Kindly please do your own due diligence. To make it a little easier, allow me to give you a headstart, I'm on at least 3 different "List of Escrow" threads on bitcointalk. I've helped prevent at least half a dozen scammers from getting any coins (by refunding everything back to participants.) The largest in fiat value I ever held was close to $5m USD.

I categorically deny any connection to them, nor do I support them. Not too many other escrows in this Wall Observer thread, so maybe thats why I'm the only one offering it. More so to discourage them actually, as you can tell.

On the 12-month chart, Bitcoin has been trending high against several chart-toppers with a current index of 45 compared to 17 for Ariana Grande and 15 for both Post Malone and Taylor Swift.

I dunno the movie mic sorry.

It doesn't automatically go up. It probably will based on historically increasing demand and the relationship between price and stock-to-flow ratio.

There is only a guarantee that new supply will dry up as Bitcoin moves towards zero inflation via the halvings. There can never be any guarantee about demand though. We're all just speculating about that.

If you want bitcoin, earn some money, instead of begging and backing crap deals

"4 year cycle" is just a synonym for claiming that it's impossible for there to be a mining bubble and the artificial scarcity event known as the halving will always make the price go up and make miners profitable, and no miners will ever have to shut off.  If you claim the price will automatically go up every halving, then that would automatically make Bitcoin a Ponzi scam.  So which one is it, kids?  Is Bitcoin a Ponzi scam or not?