Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9096. (Read 26717372 times)

Hahahahaaha

And having a pretty good sense of your inclinations towards single (or small set) of actors manipulations of the bitcoin space, seems likely that you are pretty damned receptive towards the ideas of the article (but even you are not willing to go that far)....  Go figure.    

We are not willing to go with Escrow, however Contractual Anonymity serves a similar purpose as Escrow except it is on a contract and it guarantees us 35% in advance while protecting both of parties from breaking the deal by a third party.

You can choose the Contractor if you desire to do so.

OT: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/04/study-single-anonymous-market-manipulator-pushed-bitcoin-to-20000.html

Funny that this hit piece was designed to discourage people from buying Bitcoin. But instead (whether true or not) it's actually a positive.

If this happened with supposedly just one manipulator, just imagine what would happen next time with "multiple" deep pocket manipulators? Perhaps hundreds? Lol

#getinb4moon

i think everyone in crypto market knows about tether manipulation on price, no one doubts that, this study only has one more confirmation on the subject
i think a more attractive news than this was the bitmex emails leak which had some attractive information about users
maybe aside from tether, few more institutional users are available on market

Don't we already know that frequently looking at orderbooks, we frequently see reverse indications, so in that regard if sell orders are stacking up on bitstamp, then frequently the price will move in that direction and if the buyers can buy up all of those coins on the order book, it becomes a kind of free sailing once they get through the stacked up coins on the order books.

This is an old play, somac.  It's been seen many, many, many times in bitcoinlandia, so in other words, it seems quite dangerous to presume that BTC's price is going down or failing to go up, merely because sell orders are stacking up on various order books whether on bitstamp or other exchanges and even if you see a pattern of sell orders piling up across many exchanges.

This didn't age well.

hey now

The most fair version of this deal to be possible.

True. How about the crime of insulting our intelligence?

So why offer escrow?

What a load of bullshit.  Stop getting high on your own supply.  Bitcoin is NOT "peer to peer".  Every single Bitcoin transaction involves a RENT SEEKING MIDDLEMAN (transaction validator), plus numerous other counterparties.  Exter's Pyramid is simply a measure of the ability to remove risk and counterparties.  Having BUILT IN counterparties and middlemen means NEED NOT FUCKING APPLY.

You even once claimed decentralization was an "insoluble" problem, which is the same thing as saying Bitcoin has zero fundamentals and is worth absolutely nothing.  Now you're attempting to bullshit people for personal financial gain trying to talk the pump and dump scam upwards.  And don't pull the whole "my super secret personal project I'm working on solves decentralization".  We both already know decentralization is not a solvable problem.  You already came to this conclusion once, do I need to explain why again?

Because "proof of work" ISN'T ACTUALLY WORK.  The task can be parallelized and placed entirely on autopilot.  Hence, it's more akin to generation of interest than 'work', and all interest generation systems are designed to centralize.  For it to actually be proof of work, a human would have to PHYSICALLY be solving captchas himself in a single threaded state that he cannot outsource to other parties on autopilot or parallelize.  Bitcoin used the hoax of claiming it's mining algo functions the same as email PoW when in the real world it doesn't AT ALL.

Do not 'all-in' on cognitive dissonance with digital shitcoin scams, when if an invisible hand of the market exists at all, it's going to cause physical metals to absolutely obliterate digital shitcoin hoaxes in the end.

-r0ach

Kindly please do your own due diligence. ~

I categorically deny any connection to them ~

It's not a crime until it's done ~

In this case, I'm hopefully just preventing it from even happening in the first place. Call their bluff if you will. But they can't do it. So they won't.

They'll never agree to the fair terms, so the whole deal is not going to happen. It's another form of drama specific to this thread. ~

But what does ATH means here. A moment when price will reach over old ATH of 20k and make new all time high, or ATH of the new bitcoin cycle?  I voted 2022 for the second. But I believe that Bitcoin will reach $20k much earlier then that.

i think everyone in crypto market knows about tether manipulation on price, no one doubts that

..Anyone that's traded all-in on margin before (me)..

OT: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/04/study-single-anonymous-market-manipulator-pushed-bitcoin-to-20000.html