IMHO, you fellas should ease up on jbreher.
He is NOT R. Ver or craig W, clearly.
An engineer and/or scientist, no doubt.
I root for the proper btc, but the jury is still open on whether LN would behave when we stress it with 100s of millions if not billions of users.
BTW, personally, i like second layer solutions like LN more, but I am perfectly willing to listen to the opposite opinion.
He is NOT R. Ver or craig W, clearly.
An engineer and/or scientist, no doubt.
I root for the proper btc, but the jury is still open on whether LN would behave when we stress it with 100s of millions if not billions of users.
BTW, personally, i like second layer solutions like LN more, but I am perfectly willing to listen to the opposite opinion.
Jbear and the Bcash crowd would be ok if they sought competitive differentiation. That's what competitors do. They say 'our product is different and better'. They have logos / brands which are instantly visibly distinguishable. They make their product stand on its own merits. Jbear doesn't do that. He pretends that his coin is 'Satoshi's Vision'. He pretends that it much closer to the 'original Bitcoin' than 'Segwit coin'. He says things like:
One of the things that makes BSV good is that it is being incrementally returned to the original Bitcoin protocol.
Jbear is not seeking competitive differentiation. He is seeking to pass his shitcoin off as the original Bitcoin. And I have no tolerance for shills, frauds or charlatans.
I think this could precisely be the competitive differentiation you seek. There is no doubt that BTC has gone through some major and controversial changes. But BSV's insistence on calling their coin Bitcoin is misguided. It's confusing and hurts their own case more than BTC's.
O! be some other name:
What’s in a name? that which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call’d,
You are giving bcash SV and also incidentally bcash abc too much benefit of the doubt through your lame-ass comment that suggests that their only fallacy is to attempt to co-opt the bitcoin name. Their attempt to co-opt the bitcoin name cuts both ways in terms of the extent to which they get both advantages and disadvantages from such misleading usage, and they also engage in other unforgivable and egregious conduct too (too numerous to go into here), including that on an ongoing basis, they are attempting to use whatever they have as a platform and the extent that they are able to engage in ongoing attacks on bitcoin both physical and informational.
TLDR: In other words, bcash SV (and bcash the original) are a bunch of fucktards who deserve no benefit of the doubt, including your fatass attempt at narrowing down the extent and degree of their egregiousness.
