Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9457. (Read 26708387 times)

one point three percent
every shitcoin bagholder
is this alt season?

Unknowingly, or...?
Posted a visual #haiku!
Goose with a surprise

Here is a look at the weekly chart from a couple of different perspectives. No ta..ive had a few too many cold snacks and am looking at the screen outta one eye at the moment..
Seahawks win a nail biter in the home opener against the Bengals 21-20   Life is good.  Carry on.
#dyor
W



W

#stronghands'19

Got bad news.  Silver will probably double top at $800 an ounce.

Word.  Go out there and make Beecash Satoshis Original Crispy Vision^TM happen.  Don’t sit around here complaining to us about what might have been

If we are looking more short-term BTC price dynamics, part of the question currently, in my ponderings, is whether there is going to be a weekly candle closing reaction?

Sometimes it comes before the weekly candle closing and sometimes afterwards.

BTC price dynamics seem pretty flat right now, and the weekly candle closes in about 30 minutes, at the time of my typing.

JJG, you may be a bit too wordy, but I'm glad that you spare the time to call out the destructive bullshit that jbreher spews in order to manipulate others. I am also thankful for Hairy's contributions as well. 

Who cares?  Water under the bridge.

Segwit was passed by overwhelming consensus, yet diptwats like you want to continue to argue about (then) supposed other options.. so fucking what?  That's not what happened.

Probably a decent number of the readers of this thread have already recognized that you have a significantly large amount of misleading and misinformation in your posts that tend to also get caught in the weeds of some kind of irrelevance that leans more towards intentional than not.

Regarding your stupid-ass technical arguments, they frequently are stupid-ass because they either are misleading or they are put too much weight on improbable events, which is another form of misleading.

Since it seems quite unlikely that you are going to get banned, and every once in a blue moon, you do provide some helpful information, the best that many of us can do is to merely point out some of your misleading uses of technicalities and other nonsense that you post, that might come off as innocuous on its face. You are not the first to have been engaging in such, and likely not the last, even though you have established a bit of your own signature style in this thread in such seemingly intentional misleading and deceiving regards..

There are also some smart peeps who participate in this thread (and probably readers too), who have not seemed to have recognized the intentional misleadingness of a decent number of your posts, so they engage in behavior to give you the benefit of the doubt, even though many of the times, you don't really deserve such benefit of the doubt.  

Remember Jstolfi?  He was considered to be polite too, similar to your perceived persona, but Stolfi also wreaked a decent amount of havoc through his ongoing distortionary campaigning that lasted through much  of the 2014/2015 bear market, and Stolfi had similar but different patterns from your own.. and the time was different then, too in 2014/15, of course, so the attack vectors upon bitcoin were different then, too.

It is a debate for trolls, shills, bitcoin naysayers, no coiners, and even sometimes for fence sitters.

That's part of the reason why some of our colleagues here like to cite for our edumacation purposes, the dumbasses like shelby from time to time or to refer to the purported problematic nature of the "segwit omni-changeset."    Whatever the fuck that means? hahahahhaha

Maybe we are getting caught up on semantics, but  to me, your assertion that I can do a little bit more seems to establish that you believe that my words are not enough in these here parts.



For me, personally, it does not really seem to be an appropriate topic of this thread.  I tend to be fairly selective in my sharing of some of my personal details, and yeah, maybe a few personal details might slip in, here and there but my level of do-gooder-ism, to the extent that it exists, is not one that I tend to think about bringing up or that I tend to believe necessary to bring up.   



When getting into bitcoin, there can be various reasons to do lump sum and to do DCA.  The reasons vary from each persons situation, but like I mentioned DCA can work quite well for people who are considering long term price potentials and do not want to get caught up in either the day to day or attempting to time dips with any kind of precision.  Of course, lump sum can be quite well in bitcoin, too, but frequently, newer investors might  not even have lump sums that are available.

I have frequently suggested that if someone gets a hold of a lump sum of let's say $6k, then the person divide it into three.  1/3 invest right away, 1/3 dollar cost average over a reasonable period of time, maybe even 6 months, and 1/3 buy on dips.  Of course, my recommendation might change a little bit, depending on what the market it doing and cashflow of the person and other goals that the person might have.


I already stated that I believe that it will tend to be erroneous to structure DCA for cashing out, but whatever, people say all kinds of thing, and some of the things are dumb including, in my opinion to DCA on the way out, unless there are specific circumstances justifying such a way about it.



I agree that DCA on the way out might work in some circumstances.  At least considering the matter might be better than NOT weighing various ways to do it, but surely DCA on the way out has a lot of different factors, like I mentioned in my earlier post as compared to getting in, so in that case, it is not as much of a no brainer as for on the way out as it tends to be for on the way in.


If you are saying that bitcoin is treated as capital gains, then surely that can be a factor to consider, as well in terms of tax implications, of course.


Yep.  Agreed.


There are various ways to structure, and sometimes people do it more frequently because they want hands on, but then other times, they might spread it out because they are trying to minimize fees.



I think that what I had attempted to say was that DCA in makes more sense than DCA out, for the reasons that I had stated in my earlier post.



I agree that sometimes tailoring increments might be better than a lump sump, but at least during the cashing out process, that lump sum option might be there, and when buying in, the lump sum option might either NOT be there and/or might end up being the less practical approach for getting and maintaining skin in the BTC game.

There Will be plenty of f*** ups doing that......

via Imgflip Meme Generator

Observe HODLnest
Never drunk the ALT kool’aid
The rest will follow

Goodnight brothers of this amazing thread!

https://usethebitcoin.com/jed-mccaleb-receives-100-million-xrp-from-ripple/

LOL, XRP The Bagholder standard. Jed will be dumping all of these on shitcoiners heads.

Primary intention of the lander is to research about the underground water presence of moon at any form but that might be failed due to the landing failure.

long lens on the daily. still trading sideways with a slack wind.  #dyor
D



------

its that time again..new polling options?  price guesstimates for the 22nd or...something temporally closer? the 15th?  maybe our resident pollster will work some magic and surprise us.

It’s a faerie lander, not for use in critical applications.

I can think of few things worse than being stuck on the Freewinds with Roger Ver and a bunch of beecashers.  

one day alt season,
gentlemen prefer bitcoin
shaken, not stirred