I acknowledge that a large input to BSV's market cap is the question of the Satoshiness of CSW. However, given the endemic presence of Craig Derangement Syndrome (e.g., the topic of discussion vs. your imperative to making the potential solution a referendum on CSW), it is rather unclear as to whether CSW's association with SV is price-positive, or price-negative.
Breher you know full well we're not talking about CSW's association with SV, we're talking about Satoshi's association with SV. CSW came as part of the SV package, nobody is denying that. Its not an unknown. Its been factored into the price since Day 1.
Funny that. It's not about new tech trying to solve certain problems. It is about established tech that has already solved the problem of permissionless non-inflationary money. And the ONLY chain that is progressing back to that original design.
Well, I don't know how you "progress" back to an original design, its more like a "regress." But I'd like to also use your own words to respond to this:
Gee, And I thought the topic of discussion was Microsoft's closing down access to github, and potential solutions thereupon.
Where is this goal part of the white paper, that Craig read, probably when he wrote it...
