Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9691. (Read 26609669 times)

please don't remind me

If you go to buy a house, but find the house afire, you don’t need to check for termites.

We had a few previous posts about the passing of Tyler Jenks in the past few days, and I recently found out that he was 70 years old. 

It was already mentioned in this thread that Jenks had only been in the bitcoin space for less than 2 years, yet he made some important contributions and impressions, even though criticized a lot lately for the short-term BTC bearishness of his hyperwave theory.. while he was largely proclaiming to be long term bullish about bitcoin, which surely seems to have been genuine (even if the short-term bearishness may have been disagreement worthy).

There are some tweets about him, and a video from earlier today, too.

Tone Vays and Leah Wald YouTube video discussion


Topical twitter posts from:

Old ugly goat   (I believe this was one of the first tweets about the topic)

Tone Vays


Leah Wald

LucidInvestments

Your statement might be more credible if BSV was decentralized

You forgot: American man pedophile!

I think $1 million is silly in 2020. But you are only talking about demand, which is one side of the equation.

Supply is the other side.  And if the market becomes illiquid due to withdrawal of supply, then the price can spike hard on low volume.  This is the essence of a short squeeze.  

If one morning, hodlers and miners wake up and suddenly decide that Bitcoin is worth $1 million, then they won’t sell below that point and the market dries up.  We then get a short squeeze of epic proportion and the long traders and momentum traders keep the thing going (after all they are making screaming fortunes) until we hit $1 million and supply returns.

How do you get a withdrawal of supply?  Halvening helps the supply reduction. But really once you get an insane bull market on, supply dries up because no one wants to sell when the price is doubling every week. 

I thought that McAfee was under some kind of govt. detention?

Hahahahahaha

Sounds great!!!!!!  Hopefully, you did not go too far astray?  Sometimes it is difficult to make sure that you are sufficiently balanced in terms of making sure that you make decent impressions in a job interview, and sometimes it can be a bit unclear regarding the extent to which your actual interview discussion points might affect decision making regarding either hiring you or the terms to offer in the event of a decision to make a hiring offer.

You are easily distracted, no?  Perhaps purposefully? 

If you believe that I am acting defensive, a drama queen or throwing a hissy fit, you have a lot to learn about the world and making attempts at substantive postings.

You are the ONLY one in this particular thread of a conversation who seems to be engaging in exaggerating behaviors that you are unwilling to stand behind in any kind of meaningful way, beyond making mere absolutism pronouncements of your supposed insight, when largely you are showing an ongoing pattern of behavior in which you are wrong a lot, and largely in the exaggerated bearish direction, but you never live up to your ongoing bullshit and exaggerated wrongness, and hopefully not too many people have been deceived by your largely FUD spreading posts (that your ongoing behavior shows that you will not even stand behind, when push comes to shove).

I'm not looking into the direction of electric cars until they are able to offer at least 350-500 mile range (probably in 2020ties or so).

You can’t ban the use of bitcoin, it’s impossible. You can place restrictions & sanctions but there are ways.
Unless they want to ban the internet for everybody which won’t happen.

The idiot BCH and BSV camp have the same problem with incentive. No one is going to buy either of those shitcoins just to use for daily transactions, because of the hassle of acquisition in the first place. Plus they have even less merchant support (almost non existent except for Bitcoin Judas' one Japanese coffee shop). Doesn't matter what theoretical future transaction throughput problem their blockchains purport to solve.

So the joke's on them, lol.

In another thread, I already have had a bit of a rant today about the topic of "self-made" and some seeming discounting of members who had validly and legitimately (in my view) ranked up in this forum under our pre-merit system.

Say whatever you want, I was a fan of Tesla for a while but after seeing people got toasted alive inside those cars I've changed my mind.

I don't want to sit on hundreds of Li-Ion batteries.

Also the car itself is like iphone.

I am pretty sure if Elon can remotely shut down your car. I believe the new Mercedes-Benz and BMW cars are not much different though. The selection of good cars are just becoming harder and harder.

Not anything like Facebook. Outside of selling ads, theymos engages in no site monetization.


Just like Satoshi intended  

You don't think its the least bit ironic that SV was born out of the desire to be Bcashier than Bcash, and now is trying to sell itself on how much non-transaction related data it can fit into its blocks? Wright just exudes shit from every orifice, and you slurp up every brown morsel of it.


I don't need anything else when you insist on taking a fraud's words at face value.

No diptwat.   You are not more qualified merely because you made one bitcoin purchase and in part because you still seem to be trolling and confused.

You don't overcome dumb with merely one action.  There is a process that also takes time to play out and to demonstrate that learning has actually taken place.

Begin yourself a long term dollar cost averaging plan and come back to speak with us here in this thread in a couple of years.. that is if you might learn something during such projected time.  

Alternatively, if you are kind of learning and willing to interact with some level of genuineness rather than troll/shilling tendencies, then we can perhaps bat around some ideas here and there as you are learning about bitcoin and establishing a personalized approach, again assuming that you are willing to learn.

One of the problems with you has been that you are already predisposed to talk bullshit and misleading talking points, so it is going to take a decent amount of time before you are going to be able to absorb some sound and meaningful perspectives about the asset that you have made your first purchase, and that is assuming that you are learnable... hopefully... I have not lost hope with you, yet. .. but I am thinking that you are likely going to continue to challenge my ongoing attempts to give you some benefits of my doubts.


Again... showing your ongoing and willing diptwat status.  

Now, your new BTC discussion point is going to be that your purchase of some bitcoin did not cause you to change your perspective.  Could have figured that one  out, no?...

So, yeah, some of us might start to label you as a professional (in spite of your username), not an amateur, troll.... which is what?  a shill?  Definitions, definitions?


Government agent spotted.  Is that you jbreher?  Or can you vouch for this fellow douche?    


Ironic that you seem to not even know what government is, but then again, your likely purpose is not really to spread accurate, informative or empowering information, but instead circulate bullshit propaganda nonsense - must be a bank shill rather than a government shill, but who knows, some government shills don't really understand what is government, either.  Go figure.

if you curse it enough, many would not want to until it is a too late, at least for appreciation, leaving more for those in the know (or those who have more money).

Quit being intentionally obtuse. This is where this branch of the thread originated:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51977374

Incidentally, quite amusing how you love to fly that Craig Derangement Syndrome flag yet again. It's almost as if you don't have any other tools in your toolbox.

People like John Mcafee will contribute to accelerate the banning process of cryptocurrencies by the govt.

Surely everyone can get into bitcoin, it is just a matter of how much they are able to acquire and at what price and how many of them are going to end up chasing the train, or rocket or whatever combination of vehicles we embark upon in our journey from here to there.