Topic: WALL Observer : BTC/USD price tracking and discussion (Phoenix Revision). - page 5. (Read 9878 times)

For anyone interested, Theymos has posted a poll regarding what to do with the Wall Obs. situation:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-to-do-with-the-wall-observer-thread-1993570

I'm kinda feeling the same, that we're going to stay in a narrow range for a while. Actually I think between $2400 and $2600. Seems like 'someone' wants to extend things out as long as possible until... August?

I can't imagine why.  /s

Remember to short the QUOTES.

- keep the last sentence of the QUOTE.
- the date in the QUOTE is the marker (link) to retrieve the initial message.

---

Rise of the rules in progress (Enforcement).
Stay in the subject.

I understand that posters frequently are wishing for price "stability", but your range is way too narrow, Hi-tech, and we have way too much ongoing trade volume - so it is not going to be easy to keep the price in such a tight range.. for such a long period of time.   Sure, it could happen, but there is just too much going on... and like it or not, even the trade volume in the various alts is remaining out of control and one way or another are going to have an affect on BTC prices.  I don't know which way, but I just think that the odds of flat is one of the least likely of the possibilities, at the moment.

I speculate that the price will ping pong between $2500 and $2600 for the whole of the next week. After all the volatility we are due some stability.

At some point, I may have to eat my hat, but I think it is too early to call a failure to break above $2600, even though technically you are correct, for the moment...   

The current price range seems to be about $2400 to $2700... Let's see which we are going to break?   Up or down?.. But at the moment we are in the middle of the range..  .

Maybe we are both correct, but just framing the question a little bit differently?  hahahahaha.. otherwise, if we end up breaking down, below $2400. then I might give $2600 to you... 

StockRSI indicate ... a pump in the near future.
And Volume indicate that they don't have any fuel to purge more.

I speculate  that 2600 will be broken tomorrow and then a $50 dollar jump within 24 hours

Ok boys, let's get on with speculation. This happened exactly as I said it would, price failed to bust through 2600 and is now moving lower.

Anyone wanna speculate where the price goes next?

The thing is I liked WO exactly as it was. Does that mean I liked every content? No. That I agreed with all opinions? Of course not!

It's the diversity of opinions and topics (some times only indirectly related to the main subject) that I liked the most.

I will never be in a forum or "discussion" where we all agree on everything. There's no learning possible in that situation and thus pointless for me.

I do agree that most of the time we were NOT talking about walls as the title and rules of the thread would suggest.

I understand that for the participants of WO that were ONLY interested in STRICT Wall Observing, the actual content of the thread was probably a PITA for them as they would prefer a thread with only a couple posts every few days (when walls are spotted nowadays).

Maybe a possible solution would be (as theymos suggested) moving the classic WO with all its previous content to offtopic section so that it can go on exactly as it was and leave this thread for strict Wall Observing? That way people can choose what way to go and time will tell which is the preferred choice... or just simply happily coexist both alternatives.

To be honest those shill new accounts that ppl make... and those people that come to spread rumors and decay & despair are actually fun most of the time!    


*edit: I come here mostly because the collective consciousness that works well when new things or news appears that is too hard to find from my perspective. Because some things you can get from the numerous wiki-ies info websites, but not other information, factual things about specific circumstances! ... And the entertainment ofc... most forums are active because of entertainment! (I'm a simple man... I like memes! ) ... Anyway... there could be more.

And u can short me with #STRF or @STRF ... its easier to type that.

Frequently, I don't agree with you SaveT_R_F, but you making a very good point... loose the goose, and loose the bitcoin  and loose the rules.

I am just pleased me can all share a load of shit once again on the same thread. Thanks meuh.

I agree that we may need some clarification of the intent to enforce some of these "tightening" rules.


And, yeah, regarding alt discussions, I can understand if someone is coming in to merely pump some stupid-ass alt, yet this is getting really confusing in recent times, because there are really decent, even though sometimes ambiguous connections of bitcoin's price movements, and especially ETH... sure, at first that stupid ass shit coin had little relevance to bitcoin's price movements, but in recent times it is considerably connected - sometimes moving in correlation, sometimes opposite and sometimes extreme.. which is also connected with some ICO's that can cause a considerable amount of disruption in the space but end up affecting bitcoin price movements and even potentialities (speculation) in price movements.

Regarding length of quotes, I seem to be guilty as charged when it comes to overquoting.. and therefore, I can understand why these quoting of the full post might be irksome, but some times it seems necessary for context. Anyhow, since the link is likely in the quoted portion, then maybe it is just a matter of getting used to.  I just sometimes have a problem that someone makes a comment, and then we do not know the context or from where is the reference, and sometimes it may be better just to have the quote right there in that post in  order that the reader can know the reference.   

This already feels like a dictatorship... did Big Daddy Bitcoin thought you to be like this?? Where is the spirit of freedom and breaking the rules?? Showing the finger to the banksters!  (moderators) ..

Moderator rule (already tested in the 1st page of this subject, my response has been deleted = Legit).
You can "say the word" but don't display graphic or link (use an other thread in the right "alt" section to follow the white rabbit).

We are in a Bitcoin forum.
And ressources are spend for this.


The 1 week.
Need time to purge the mind of all participant from old habit.
Moderator team help, too.

I understand that blatant shilling of alts is forbidden but... Any reference to them is forbidden? Is it allowed when it is related to the price of Bitcoin? ie: *censored* market cap grows over Bitcoin and that causes a crash... or the oppossite, *censored* crash hard and bitcoin moons... can we comment those movements?

Or... When Segwit signaling keeps growing and is clear it will pass, can we reference how *censored* mooned when the same happenned and compare the two graphs, etc...

TL;DR; Any reference to altcoins is estrictly forbidden or does it depends on its context and relevant price influence over Bitcoin?

P.S.: I don't observe any relevant walls at this moment.

   

Tightenering of the rules in progress ...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wall-observer-btcusd-price-tracking-and-discussion-phoenix-revision-1991115

This isn't the reborn WO thread. It is a shallow impostor.


Confirmed.

This feels like home already.