Topic: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - page 516. (Read 1811613 times)
These candlewicks lately...
You probably would've laughed even more if someone told you that some dude managed to double-spend BTC 211.
I believe that was exploit played against OKPay's confirmation policy, not a doublespend on the blockchain.
You're wrong.
Did you actually read the damn post?
Quote
All time UTC+08:00:
08:08 – Well before I knew what later have happened, I deposited $10000-worth Bitcoins to BTC-e over OKPAY's Bitcoin payment, I paid OKPAY address 12z2n8YCJw1BEsJhhQPLCTuLqwH341nKnE 211.9093 BTC and 0.0005 BTC as transaction fee.
09:30 – The transaction was included in version 0.8's fork, block 225446
10:08 – Deposit completed, $9800 credited to my BTC-e account
12:53 – After some study, I recognized, the transaction, though included in version 0.8's fork, was never confirmed by the pre-0.8 fork, so I decided to make two double spend transactions on two of the vins of the OKPAY transaction, and broadcasted them with the raw transaction API, 0.001 BTC transaction fee included in each transaction.
13:01 – The double spend transaction was included in pre-0.8 fork block 225446
Looks like BDB strikes back.08:08 – Well before I knew what later have happened, I deposited $10000-worth Bitcoins to BTC-e over OKPAY's Bitcoin payment, I paid OKPAY address 12z2n8YCJw1BEsJhhQPLCTuLqwH341nKnE 211.9093 BTC and 0.0005 BTC as transaction fee.
09:30 – The transaction was included in version 0.8's fork, block 225446
10:08 – Deposit completed, $9800 credited to my BTC-e account
12:53 – After some study, I recognized, the transaction, though included in version 0.8's fork, was never confirmed by the pre-0.8 fork, so I decided to make two double spend transactions on two of the vins of the OKPAY transaction, and broadcasted them with the raw transaction API, 0.001 BTC transaction fee included in each transaction.
13:01 – The double spend transaction was included in pre-0.8 fork block 225446
O shit... time for mtgox to lag out
You probably would've laughed even more if someone told you that some dude managed to double-spend BTC 211.
I believe that was exploit played against OKPay's confirmation policy, not a doublespend on the blockchain.
You're wrong.
Did you actually read the damn post?
Quote
All time UTC+08:00:
08:08 – Well before I knew what later have happened, I deposited $10000-worth Bitcoins to BTC-e over OKPAY's Bitcoin payment, I paid OKPAY address 12z2n8YCJw1BEsJhhQPLCTuLqwH341nKnE 211.9093 BTC and 0.0005 BTC as transaction fee.
09:30 – The transaction was included in version 0.8's fork, block 225446
10:08 – Deposit completed, $9800 credited to my BTC-e account
12:53 – After some study, I recognized, the transaction, though included in version 0.8's fork, was never confirmed by the pre-0.8 fork, so I decided to make two double spend transactions on two of the vins of the OKPAY transaction, and broadcasted them with the raw transaction API, 0.001 BTC transaction fee included in each transaction.
13:01 – The double spend transaction was included in pre-0.8 fork block 225446
08:08 – Well before I knew what later have happened, I deposited $10000-worth Bitcoins to BTC-e over OKPAY's Bitcoin payment, I paid OKPAY address 12z2n8YCJw1BEsJhhQPLCTuLqwH341nKnE 211.9093 BTC and 0.0005 BTC as transaction fee.
09:30 – The transaction was included in version 0.8's fork, block 225446
10:08 – Deposit completed, $9800 credited to my BTC-e account
12:53 – After some study, I recognized, the transaction, though included in version 0.8's fork, was never confirmed by the pre-0.8 fork, so I decided to make two double spend transactions on two of the vins of the OKPAY transaction, and broadcasted them with the raw transaction API, 0.001 BTC transaction fee included in each transaction.
13:01 – The double spend transaction was included in pre-0.8 fork block 225446
Looks like BDB strikes back.
Are you suggesting Bitcoin will be defeated by an older version of the code? Oh wait...!
Or Litecoin is the new Dragonborn.....every price dip is an arrow to the knee You probably would've laughed even more if someone told you that some dude managed to double-spend BTC 211.
I believe that was exploit played against OKPay's confirmation policy, not a doublespend on the blockchain.
You're wrong.
Did you actually read the damn post?
Quote
All time UTC+08:00:
08:08 – Well before I knew what later have happened, I deposited $10000-worth Bitcoins to BTC-e over OKPAY's Bitcoin payment, I paid OKPAY address 12z2n8YCJw1BEsJhhQPLCTuLqwH341nKnE 211.9093 BTC and 0.0005 BTC as transaction fee.
09:30 – The transaction was included in version 0.8's fork, block 225446
10:08 – Deposit completed, $9800 credited to my BTC-e account
12:53 – After some study, I recognized, the transaction, though included in version 0.8's fork, was never confirmed by the pre-0.8 fork, so I decided to make two double spend transactions on two of the vins of the OKPAY transaction, and broadcasted them with the raw transaction API, 0.001 BTC transaction fee included in each transaction.
13:01 – The double spend transaction was included in pre-0.8 fork block 225446
08:08 – Well before I knew what later have happened, I deposited $10000-worth Bitcoins to BTC-e over OKPAY's Bitcoin payment, I paid OKPAY address 12z2n8YCJw1BEsJhhQPLCTuLqwH341nKnE 211.9093 BTC and 0.0005 BTC as transaction fee.
09:30 – The transaction was included in version 0.8's fork, block 225446
10:08 – Deposit completed, $9800 credited to my BTC-e account
12:53 – After some study, I recognized, the transaction, though included in version 0.8's fork, was never confirmed by the pre-0.8 fork, so I decided to make two double spend transactions on two of the vins of the OKPAY transaction, and broadcasted them with the raw transaction API, 0.001 BTC transaction fee included in each transaction.
13:01 – The double spend transaction was included in pre-0.8 fork block 225446
I take it you didn't watch the whole movie....
Are you suggesting Bitcoin will be defeated by an older version of the code? Oh wait...!
Those damn bitcoins are like T1000:
You can shoot them in the face:
You can blow their head off:
...but in the end, they will just recover:
I take it you didn't watch the whole movie....
Can't stop laughing.
this is nuts.
Those damn bitcoins are like T1000:
You can shoot them in the face:
You can blow their head off:
...but in the end, they will just recover:
I take it you didn't watch the whole movie....
Can't stop laughing.
Those damn bitcoins are like T1000:
You can shoot them in the face:
You can blow their head off:
...but in the end, they will just recover:
I take it you didn't watch the whole movie....
You probably would've laughed even more if someone told you that some dude managed to double-spend BTC 211.
I believe that was exploit played against OKPay's confirmation policy, not a doublespend on the blockchain.
Those damn bitcoins are like T1000:
You can shoot them in the face:
You can blow their head off:
...but in the end, they will just recover:
Hilarious how the we-don't-know-why-dip last week is significantly stronger than the O-M-G-Bitcoin-is-broken-dip today 
Only reason I can think of: we were short-term overbought then, while I believe we were just gathering energy to make a big jump upwards when the fork news hit.
Thus there was a lot of fiat waiting for cheaper coins.
I am also amazed at the amount of liquidity in the exchange. I clearly remember when the order book showed 1 million, people were celebrating. Now it is close to 6 million.
Shit, if someone had said to me last night we'd be back in 45-46 territory today, I would've laughed.
You probably would've laughed even more if someone told you that some dude managed to double-spend BTC 211.
It's an opportunity to upgrade the software.
Shit, if someone had said to me last night we'd be back in 45-46 territory today, I would've laughed.
You probably would've laughed even more if someone told you that some dude managed to double-spend BTC 211.
Still laughing at that one. He double spent on the only set of circumstances that allow a double spend, and only because the merchant wasn't paying attention, and only until the 0.7 chain caught up... bit of a wild goose chase, this.
Shit, if someone had said to me last night we'd be back in 45-46 territory today, I would've laughed.
You probably would've laughed even more if someone told you that some dude managed to double-spend BTC 211.
Those damn bitcoins are like T1000:
You can shoot them in the face:
You can blow their head off:
...but in the end, they will just recover:
Shit, if someone had said to me last night we'd be back in 45-46 territory today, I would've laughed.
Humanitee, where are you? I need you to hold me in your mammal flippers, stroke my hair, and tell me everything will be alright.
And maybe warm me up a plate of pizza rolls.
And maybe warm me up a plate of pizza rolls.
manitee's boy ahahahaha!
You gonna add a NMC address to your siggy? Heard it's today's fashionable alt-coin.
Humanitee, where are you? I need you to hold me in your mammal flippers, stroke my hair, and tell me everything will be alright.
And maybe warm me up a plate of pizza rolls.
And maybe warm me up a plate of pizza rolls.
manitee's boy ahahahaha!
Jump to: