Humanitee, where are you? I need you to hold me in your mammal flippers, stroke my hair, and tell me everything will be alright.
And maybe warm me up a plate of pizza rolls.
Topic: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - page 517. (Read 1811613 times)
Hilarious how the we-don't-know-why-dip last week is significantly stronger than the O-M-G-Bitcoin-is-broken-dip today 
Only reason I can think of: we were short-term overbought then, while I believe we were just gathering energy to make a big jump upwards when the fork news hit.
Thus there was a lot of fiat waiting for cheaper coins.
Hilarious how the we-don't-know-why-dip last week is significantly stronger than the O-M-G-Bitcoin-is-broken-dip today
I am continually amazed by this.
Great job holders, you sexy bastards.
Better hold again on news of this double spend
. 
Hilarious how the we-don't-know-why-dip last week is significantly stronger than the O-M-G-Bitcoin-is-broken-dip today
We pay a small fee, or just kill off s.dice until we can get a better fix.
A small fee will more or less kill off 90% of s.dice transactions anyway.
A small fee will more or less kill off 90% of s.dice transactions anyway.
If you kill S.DICE, you will kill bitcoin. S.DICE has attracted many new and wealthy users to bitcoin. We don't have much else in bitcoin economy (just miners and hoarders speculators).
Bull. Various company/stock "share" scams are not the bitcoin economy. That's just what the pirate investor and pass-through operators wanted people to believe. GLBSE is now gone and was barely a blip. I would be extremely careful with S.DICE and other "shares". IMO, shares are worth about as much as the paper you could print them on.
Hoarding, speculating, and operating services are the main activities which add value to the bitcoin economy. But every attempt so far to do deposits-for-interest has resulted in either lost or stolen coins.
I'm not talking about any shares
I'm talking about gambling industry that is a important part of bitcoin economy. Lots of people are playing Satoshi Dice and gambling industry as a whole is interested in bitcoin thanks to S.DICE. If some people want to kill Satoshi Dice because bitcoin is unable to cope with high transaction volumes than bitcoin has no future as a currency; it's technically inapt. 
We pay a small fee, or just kill off s.dice until we can get a better fix.
A small fee will more or less kill off 90% of s.dice transactions anyway.
A small fee will more or less kill off 90% of s.dice transactions anyway.
If you kill S.DICE, you will kill bitcoin. S.DICE has attracted many new and wealthy users to bitcoin. We don't have much else in bitcoin economy (just miners and hoarders speculators).
Bull. Various company/stock "share" scams are not the bitcoin economy. That's just what the pirate investor and pass-through operators wanted people to believe. GLBSE is now gone and was barely a blip. I would be extremely careful with S.DICE and other "shares". IMO, shares are worth about as much as the paper you could print them on.
Hoarding, speculating, and operating services are the main activities which add value to the bitcoin economy. But every attempt so far to do deposits-for-interest has resulted in either lost or stolen coins.
We pay a small fee, or just kill off s.dice until we can get a better fix.
A small fee will more or less kill off 90% of s.dice transactions anyway.
A small fee will more or less kill off 90% of s.dice transactions anyway.
If you kill S.DICE, you will kill bitcoin. S.DICE has attracted many new and wealthy users to bitcoin. We don't have much else in bitcoin economy (just miners and hoarders speculators).
Lol! Max Keiser is hilarious! Watch his video interview http://maxkeiser.com/ "Bitcoin Millionare vs Paper Millionare".... skip forward to 7:47 "The clouds are opening up for Satoshi... cyber christ.... christ is back and he has got bitcoin" LMFAO!
Absolutely hilarious! I clipped that segment yesterday and put it in this thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/max-keiser-bitcoin-millionaire-heralds-satoshis-bitcoin-as-cyber-christ-151820
Original Clip (19 seconds):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?edit=vd&v=xnnOtdOcOFk
Lol! Max Keiser is hilarious! Watch his video interview http://maxkeiser.com/ "Bitcoin Millionare vs Paper Millionare".... skip forward to 7:47 "The clouds are opening up for Satoshi... cyber christ.... christ is back and he has got bitcoin" LMFAO!
LOL, thanks for that, the guys great
10min 40 is also great
i love the guy lmao
Lol! Max Keiser is hilarious! Watch his video interview http://maxkeiser.com/ "Bitcoin Millionare vs Paper Millionare".... skip forward to 7:47 "The clouds are opening up for Satoshi... cyber christ.... christ is back and he has got bitcoin" LMFAO!
There has been far less FUD than I anticipated. Bitcoin faced a serious bug and faced it successfully. It was handled as professionally as efficiently as it could've been handled under the circumstances. The net effect for me is that I have increased trust in Bitcoin now. Bugs are always a possibility in any software project, even if it is serious and well tested software.
Not sure how the average Bitcoiner will react but I'm starting to think the effect of this won't be so massively negative as I thought at first. I was panicking for a while like many others, but the situation is much clearer now.
Not sure how the average Bitcoiner will react but I'm starting to think the effect of this won't be so massively negative as I thought at first. I was panicking for a while like many others, but the situation is much clearer now.
I agree. It was handled exceptionally well. Just look at banks when they have software problems: http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/it-business/3372424/rbs-woes-continue-as-fresh-it-glitches-hit-natwest/http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/it-business/3372424/rbs-woes-continue-as-fresh-it-glitches-hit-natwest/
TL;DR: Banks are down for months from software problems, Bitcoin was resolved in hours.
I thought about the exact same thing, when the "software update" went wrong, RBS were screwed for more than a couple of weeks
I mean by this that the price will go up and actually bring buy volume with it instead of having the price bounce around an entire $1 range.
Not real enough buy volume to you ?
btw, we already beat the daily record volume today
Sorry, what I meant was that the buy orders would start at $47 and not really gain any depth until $46 somewhere while the sells were at $48 or so. This caused huge price swings anytime more than 5 BTC at a time were moved.
I mean by this that the price will go up and actually bring buy volume with it instead of having the price bounce around an entire $1 range.
Not real enough buy volume to you ?
btw, we already beat the daily record volume today
There has been far less FUD than I anticipated. Bitcoin faced a serious bug and faced it successfully. It was handled as professionally as efficiently as it could've been handled under the circumstances. The net effect for me is that I have increased trust in Bitcoin now. Bugs are always a possibility in any software project, even if it is serious and well tested software.
Not sure how the average Bitcoiner will react but I'm starting to think the effect of this won't be so massively negative as I thought at first. I was panicking for a while like many others, but the situation is much clearer now.
Not sure how the average Bitcoiner will react but I'm starting to think the effect of this won't be so massively negative as I thought at first. I was panicking for a while like many others, but the situation is much clearer now.
I agree. It was handled exceptionally well. Just look at banks when they have software problems: http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/it-business/3372424/rbs-woes-continue-as-fresh-it-glitches-hit-natwest/http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/it-business/3372424/rbs-woes-continue-as-fresh-it-glitches-hit-natwest/
TL;DR: Banks are down for months from software problems, Bitcoin was resolved in hours.
There has been far less FUD than I anticipated. Bitcoin faced a serious bug and faced it successfully. It was handled as professionally as efficiently as it could've been handled under the circumstances. The net effect for me is that I have increased trust in Bitcoin now. Bugs are always a possibility in any software project, even if it is serious and well tested software.
Not sure how the average Bitcoiner will react but I'm starting to think the effect of this won't be so massively negative as I thought at first. I was panicking for a while like many others, but the situation is much clearer now.
Not sure how the average Bitcoiner will react but I'm starting to think the effect of this won't be so massively negative as I thought at first. I was panicking for a while like many others, but the situation is much clearer now.
+1 Hear hear and cheers!
Also, another benefit may turn out to be "real" increases in price. I mean by this that the price will go up and actually bring buy volume with it instead of having the price bounce around an entire $1 range. The sort-of reset the incident caused yesterday may improve this an, thus, increase demand.
There has been far less FUD than I anticipated. Bitcoin faced a serious bug and faced it successfully. It was handled as professionally as efficiently as it could've been handled under the circumstances. The net effect for me is that I have increased trust in Bitcoin now. Bugs are always a possibility in any software project, even if it is serious and well tested software.
Not sure how the average Bitcoiner will react but I'm starting to think the effect of this won't be so massively negative as I thought at first. I was panicking for a while like many others, but the situation is much clearer now.
Not sure how the average Bitcoiner will react but I'm starting to think the effect of this won't be so massively negative as I thought at first. I was panicking for a while like many others, but the situation is much clearer now.
I agree... next time you panic, though, do it inwardly
There has been far less FUD than I anticipated. Bitcoin faced a serious bug and faced it successfully. It was handled as professionally as efficiently as it could've been handled under the circumstances. The net effect for me is that I have increased trust in Bitcoin now. Bugs are always a possibility in any software project, even if it is serious and well tested software.
Not sure how the average Bitcoiner will react but I'm starting to think the effect of this won't be so massively negative as I thought at first. I was panicking for a while like many others, but the situation is much clearer now.
Not sure how the average Bitcoiner will react but I'm starting to think the effect of this won't be so massively negative as I thought at first. I was panicking for a while like many others, but the situation is much clearer now.
We pay a small fee, or just kill off s.dice until we can get a better fix.
A small fee will more or less kill off 90% of s.dice transactions anyway.
A small fee will more or less kill off 90% of s.dice transactions anyway.
s.dice pays fees from what I've heard.
Jump to: