Pages:
Author

Topic: WARNING! Bitcoin will soon block small transaction outputs - page 25. (Read 58538 times)

legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Maybe use litecoin, that's one of the reasons it was created.

Minimal fee is 0.1 LTC. It's 35 cents. Too high for micro-transactions.

Does anyone know which alts are currently ideal for micro-transactions?

Bytecoin works good with 0 BTE fee.

Litecoin tried that too. One person needs only start sending billions of satoshi sized transactions for the whole network to seize up.

Currently.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
Maybe use litecoin, that's one of the reasons it was created.

Minimal fee is 0.1 LTC. It's 35 cents. Too high for micro-transactions.

Does anyone know which alts are currently ideal for micro-transactions?

Bytecoin works good with 0 BTE fee.

Litecoin tried that too. One person needs only start sending billions of satoshi sized transactions for the whole network to seize up.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
If the vast majority of the community doesn't like this move can't we just ignore the new patch and refuse to upgrade?

Go ahead. :-) I think you will be disappointed however.

If the majority doesn't upgrade and the majority doesn't want it.  Then the devs need to listen to the majority.  End of Story.

True. Unless of course some hard fork appears- then you're either going to need to get new devs or upgrade in a jiffy.

While technically of course you're right, the majority are the large mining pools and the really big miners who are by and large are quite active in talking about future developments. So it's really voting by hash power, and the people who control the vast amount of hash power aren't the same as the majority of people using bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Maybe use litecoin, that's one of the reasons it was created.

Minimal fee is 0.1 LTC. It's 35 cents. Too high for micro-transactions.

Does anyone know which alts are currently ideal for micro-transactions?

Bytecoin works good with 0 BTE fee.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
If the vast majority of the community doesn't like this move can't we just ignore the new patch and refuse to upgrade?

Go ahead. :-) I think you will be disappointed however.

How so? If the vast majority stick with the 0.8.1 client I think the 0.8.2 client people would be disappointed.
Bitcoin is still Beta level software- there are still quite a few bugs to be worked out.

Um, transaction size is not a bug.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
If the vast majority of the community doesn't like this move can't we just ignore the new patch and refuse to upgrade?

Go ahead. :-) I think you will be disappointed however.

How so? If the vast majority stick with the 0.8.1 client I think the 0.8.2 client people would be disappointed.

Well they are fixing things in the upgrade releases, so I think in general you will want to upgrade. If not now, then eventually. Bitcoin is still Beta level software- there are still quite a few bugs to be worked out.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
I think that the point here is that we don't have any better solutions. I don't care about pico dollars transactions. I'm worried about how it looks like we can't handle a high volume of transactions.

Agreed.  Also who is saying the price is staying where it is?  It could go to 10k then these transactions would be necessary.  So we change functionality again?  Sorry, this is bullshit.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
From what i've read, what people are saying is that 0.8.2. is going to not allow micro transactions worth less than 5430 satoshi's?
Bitcoin was designed to be divisible by 8 decimal places, If we are removing some of those decimals we are undermining the entire structure of bitcoin!

I can fully understand and agree that a transaction of .00000002 should be blocked though
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
I think that the point here is that we don't have any better solutions. I don't care about pico dollars transactions. I'm worried about how it looks like we can't handle a high volume of transactions.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250

Volatility of price is one thing...volatility of functionality is another.

Bingo...

legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
I agree with this we need to fork, bitcoin was once known for the small transactions, and they want to take that away. Gavin has an ego and it needs to be taken under control. This is ridiculous this is a fix because they don't want to spend time trying to fix the bloat of the blockchain thru censorship!
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
I don't want to derail this thread, which is a good debate on whether or not there should be a patch.

So, for those who are firmly in the camp that this is a very bad patch and want to boycott the upgrade, go here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2040300

You need to make a poll...
hero member
Activity: 614
Merit: 500
I don't want to derail this thread, which is a good debate on whether or not there should be a patch.

So, for those who are firmly in the camp that this is a very bad patch and want to boycott the upgrade, go here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2040300
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
You are WRONG!
In theory this is not a protocol change, but in practice it is.

Miners running this fork of the software will not only not process small transactions, but they will not even relay them.  Which means that miners running legitimate clients will not be able to process small transactions because these transactions will never be relayed to them.

Bitcoin is no longer sufficiently divisible to be the global currency.  This really changes the potential maximum valuation.

Anyone blaming Satoshi's Dice is not contributing to the conversation.  The block size is limited to 1 MB, which is not too big.  If you don't want SD transactions in the chain feel free to out-compete them by making transactions with larger fees.
fuck you! you should not decide what my computer send and what it does not send. if i don't want to relay transactions under a certain value, i don't relay them.

fork the client, and stop crying.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
Maybe use litecoin, that's one of the reasons it was created.

Minimal fee is 0.1 LTC. It's 35 cents. Too high for micro-transactions.

Does anyone know which alts are currently ideal for micro-transactions?
legendary
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
This is a big hit on my business model.

Volatility of price is one thing...volatility of functionality is another.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
You can all thank Erik "Tony Hayward" Voorhees for polluting the blockchain so badly that this has come to pass.

Thanks for "stress testing" us to a hard-fork, Erik (again). You're such a champ - at taking people's money. I'd also like to thank all the mouth-breathing fools that thought Satoshi Dice was a good idea. You're also at fault too.

Great job, Erik - you profit-first douchebag.
Nonsense, bitcoin is about profit and free market, if a single person is able to do so much damage then it is bitcoin fault
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 531
In theory this is not a protocol change, but in practice it isn't.

Miners running this fork of the software will not only not process small transactions, but they will not even relay them.  Which means that miners running legitimate clients will not be able to process small transactions because these transactions will never be relayed to them.

Bitcoin is no longer sufficiently divisible to be the global currency.  This really changes the potential maximum valuation.

Anyone blaming Satoshi's Dice is not contributing to the conversation.  The block size is limited to 1 MB, which is not too big.  If you don't want SD transactions in the chain feel free to out-compete them by making transactions with larger fees.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1121
You can all thank Erik "Tony Hayward" Voorhees for polluting the blockchain so badly that this has come to pass.

Thanks for "stress testing" us to a hard-fork, Erik (again). You're such a champ - at taking people's money. I'd also like to thank all the mouth-breathing fools that thought Satoshi Dice was a good idea. You're also at fault too.

Great job, Erik - you profit-first douchebag.
sr. member
Activity: 452
Merit: 252
from democracy to self-rule.
If the vast majority of the community doesn't like this move can't we just ignore the new patch and refuse to upgrade?

So NOT upgrading would work against this? What are the other alternatives? Would changing wallets work?

I seriously want to opt out of this one. Please list the alternatives so people/miners can decide for themselves.
Pages:
Jump to: