in short, prove yourself/the project first and people will invest if it is good (for what it's worth).
a lot of people in bitcointalk learned their lessons
Hey! Yes, that's how crowd funded campaigns work.
I hope I am being clear and open about all this to attract confidence of the investors. I'll be presenting more ideas and explanations in the days to come.
release wallet v.2 , set individual warp price at 5000 sats , and set a a minimum buy-in of 0.1 btc + reserve a bit of the warp for yourself for future bounties etc, so 2000 warp per 0.1 btc
for example ethereum sold 1000 ether for 1 btc & raising the threshold of the minimum buyin over time, worked well for them, although it did take some time for the price to rise above $1 (price of bitcoin at the time was roughly $1000)
just some food for thought
in my opinion, you're thoughts are not compatible to the thoughts of the dev.
he don't wants an elite-coin.
Yeah, quite right. For distribution to be fair it can't be limited to such minimum buy-in.
I like the small distribution approach. I think the WarpGO_features document is interesting. I guess the unknown qualifications of the dev is a bit of an issue... but many coin are that way at least initially. For now I keep an eye open and wish all the best.
Hey! Thanks for the best wishes. I'm not a developer as in someone that writes software. Of course the concept and most of the work has been done by myself. For the implementation of v2, an experience developer was hired (he's awaiting if the project is a go or not). For other things, like web wallet and API work, there's another coder that works with me.
