Pages:
Author

Topic: WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform. - page 31. (Read 2389188 times)

hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 541
Hi;

I have seen few days ago waves price was around 240K in DEX. If it is not an error, I am surprised to see a long-winded bull run in the near future.

Kind regards
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 541
You should never keep your Bitcoins on any wallet/platform without the access to your private keys, I know with your Waves seed you could have

All the coins and tokens deposited on lite client of Waves but having the private key directly is the best way to go specially with Bitcoin, you could

Hold as many ETH on it as you wish because it'll never reach near what Bitcoin price is now ever. Waves is undervalued now as hell, any of you

Remember when ETH was $6? could you really imagine it's price going as high as $300-390? if you could then you should be a millionaire right now

Good for you, those who believed it, bought as many as they could afford to, Waves is in somewhat parallel situation, it has just been launched and

There will be more updates from a dedicated team, they have spent serious time and money on this and it is unlikely for them to stop developing this

Great project further. I bought around 230-250 Waves at $2 and now I regret not buying a few thousands when I had the chance.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000

Is it possible to create btc wallet using the seed from waves lite but a btc wallet e.g. bitcoin hd wallet? Same question for ether .

No the WAVES wallet can only store WAVES or WAVES tokens.   The BTC or ETHER in the wallet is a token that represents those coins - the actual BTC/ETHER is held in a gateway.  Honestly if you are that clueless you should spend a day or two reading about how these things work.
hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 738
Mixing reinvented for your privacy | chipmixer.com
Any way to dump all those worthless coins without paying 0.003 waves fee??  Selling fee is higher than the coin value? 
find some address you can dump your worthless coins and try use 0.00000001 fee
I've seen asset transfer & simple send with fee as low as 1 wavetoshi (should we call this? Grin)
but maybe waves dev can give more explanations on tx fee official rules/consensus
full member
Activity: 714
Merit: 105
http://prntscr.com/g6gzk2

moon days incomıng. get ready for ıt.
Not now , please let me buy more.😉
full member
Activity: 714
Merit: 105
Do you recieve bcc using only waves wallet? I ask because i cant see any support for bcc inside waves lite.
Or Is it possibe to get btc private key for btcw inside waves wallet?
Is it possible to create btc wallet using the seed from waves lite but a btc wallet e.g. bitcoin hd wallet? Same question for ether .
full member
Activity: 714
Merit: 105
Do you recieve bcc using only waves wallet? I ask because i cant see any support for bcc inside waves lite.
Or Is it possibe to get btc private key for btcw inside waves wallet?
hero member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 645
http://prntscr.com/g6gzk2

moon days incomıng. get ready for ıt.
full member
Activity: 141
Merit: 100
Hi waves,
I have a question,
What did happen to btc holders of waves platform,  when hardfork ?
How did they commit bcc?

I received an equel amount of BCC (BCH).
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
Yes, the crypto community seems to be in agreement. But less we forget, our community is still really small. Not that size implies wisdom.

Yes, that is what I was saying. If I'm completely honest, I'm having a hard time even imagining all the possibilities of token platforms like ethereum and waves. But surely, we are in the early 90's discussing the possibilities of the internet, giving examples of sending mail in minutes instead of weeks, not realizing what beast the internet will become in 25 years.

That is why I think there should be a lot of thought put in on a scale in 20-30 years time. Just look at bitcoin. It wasn't really built for this scale. And this scale is small in comparison to the number of users it's going to have in 5 years time.

Yes true.  I suppose in some respects this comes down to the interests of the individual vs the community as a whole and also the dichotomy between short term and long term interests.  The bitcoin scaling debate is a good illustration of this.  This is one of the reasons why I find economics and particularly the psychology behind it fascinating!  Hopefully we will find a solution rather than ending up with future stalemates.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 541
Every time developers of any project implement and add something to the platform or just the wallet, I see price going up very fast, maybe with

The speed of lightning, honestly if I believe in a project and their developers, I buy a few bags and hold them no matter what, not to sell later when

The price increases, but to have a saying in the future of that project. currently Waves is not yet near complete, and I'm sure when it will be completed

Price will skyrocket up to $50 or even more? if a few minor fixes and a small update for the lite client could push the price from $3 up to $5.9 then

Imagine what happens when we have access to the full features of Waves platform? I can predict a price rise from $5 to $20 in the first 24 hours.
full member
Activity: 714
Merit: 105
Hi waves,
I have a question,
What did happen to btc holders of waves platform,  when hardfork ?
How did they commit bcc?
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 552
"Added several useful features to $WAVES Lite Client. Also fixed a pack of bugs. And added 25 verified assets. Enjoy"

https://twitter.com/xenohuntero/status/895311917560025089

https://twitter.com/xenohuntero/status/895311939496288256

B paмкax ICO-Hypethon c лeкциeй выcтyпит ocнoвaтeль Bitcoin Foundation Джoн Maтoниc

https://twitter.com/afisha/status/895278577540845568

I dont want more junk assets that cost more money in fees to sell them than to keep them filling up my wallet.

I think soon you can hide them in the Lite Client.
For now, ignore unwanted tokens.
How to hide them?  I can find any references in any menu..
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 504
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
Could someone help me to find Wave attachment to transfer ZRcoin to my Waves client?
Where should I look for it?
member
Activity: 132
Merit: 10

Well, you imply as if there is consensus on this, but there isn't. Most of the economic community is torn between this being either a good thing or a bad thing. I understand that Satoshi Nakamoto's whitepaper proposed we go back to a limit system, and I don't disagree. When it's regarding money. But I don't see Waves as a currency, at least not in the long run. Not in the same way that Bitcoins, Monero, etc. are considered.
What makes the limited supply a good thing regarding a token platform like Waves?

Well I think there is quite a strong consensus on it in the cryptocurrency community. 

I think it makes sense from a valuation perspective but I think I understand what you are saying i.e. that if there is restricted supply then at some future point WAVES may become so expensive that it is difficult to do the things that are the purpose of the token? 

I think that is already becoming an issue with ETH.  Not sure there is a perfect solution.

It is kind of paradox.  You need something to have value in the markets to get the attention it needs to reach critical mass and be used. Restricted supply helps to do that but as you imply it may create inertia in the future.

One way is to constantly adjust fees (e.g. for transactions or token creation etc) but people are generally not good at dealing with decimals.

Interesting discussion.  Thank you:)
Yes, the crypto community seems to be in agreement. But less we forget, our community is still really small. Not that size implies wisdom.

Yes, that is what I was saying. If I'm completely honest, I'm having a hard time even imagining all the possibilities of token platforms like ethereum and waves. But surely, we are in the early 90's discussing the possibilities of the internet, giving examples of sending mail in minutes instead of weeks, not realizing what beast the internet will become in 25 years.

That is why I think there should be a lot of thought put in on a scale in 20-30 years time. Just look at bitcoin. It wasn't really built for this scale. And this scale is small in comparison to the number of users it's going to have in 5 years time.
sr. member
Activity: 994
Merit: 277
"Added several useful features to $WAVES Lite Client. Also fixed a pack of bugs. And added 25 verified assets. Enjoy"

https://twitter.com/xenohuntero/status/895311917560025089

https://twitter.com/xenohuntero/status/895311939496288256

B paмкax ICO-Hypethon c лeкциeй выcтyпит ocнoвaтeль Bitcoin Foundation Джoн Maтoниc

https://twitter.com/afisha/status/895278577540845568

I dont want more junk assets that cost more money in fees to sell them than to keep them filling up my wallet.

I think soon you can hide them in the Lite Client.
For now, ignore unwanted tokens.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 552
"Added several useful features to $WAVES Lite Client. Also fixed a pack of bugs. And added 25 verified assets. Enjoy"

https://twitter.com/xenohuntero/status/895311917560025089

https://twitter.com/xenohuntero/status/895311939496288256

B paмкax ICO-Hypethon c лeкциeй выcтyпит ocнoвaтeль Bitcoin Foundation Джoн Maтoниc

https://twitter.com/afisha/status/895278577540845568

I dont want more junk assets that cost more money in fees to sell them than to keep them filling up my wallet.
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1000
"Added several useful features to $WAVES Lite Client. Also fixed a pack of bugs. And added 25 verified assets. Enjoy"

https://twitter.com/xenohuntero/status/895311917560025089

https://twitter.com/xenohuntero/status/895311939496288256

B paмкax ICO-Hypethon c лeкциeй выcтyпит ocнoвaтeль Bitcoin Foundation Джoн Maтoниc

https://twitter.com/afisha/status/895278577540845568
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100

Well, you imply as if there is consensus on this, but there isn't. Most of the economic community is torn between this being either a good thing or a bad thing. I understand that Satoshi Nakamoto's whitepaper proposed we go back to a limit system, and I don't disagree. When it's regarding money. But I don't see Waves as a currency, at least not in the long run. Not in the same way that Bitcoins, Monero, etc. are considered.
What makes the limited supply a good thing regarding a token platform like Waves?

Well I think there is quite a strong consensus on it in the cryptocurrency community. 

I think it makes sense from a valuation perspective but I think I understand what you are saying i.e. that if there is restricted supply then at some future point WAVES may become so expensive that it is difficult to do the things that are the purpose of the token? 

I think that is already becoming an issue with ETH.  Not sure there is a perfect solution.

It is kind of paradox.  You need something to have value in the markets to get the attention it needs to reach critical mass and be used. Restricted supply helps to do that but as you imply it may create inertia in the future.

One way is to constantly adjust fees (e.g. for transactions or token creation etc) but people are generally not good at dealing with decimals.

Interesting discussion.  Thank you:)

decimals are ok, people get used to everything. You won't say "bitcoin" in 10 years (if bitcoin is ok then). You will say "satoshi" because 1 bitcoin will be too high for everyday expenditures. Same with other currencies
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000

Well, you imply as if there is consensus on this, but there isn't. Most of the economic community is torn between this being either a good thing or a bad thing. I understand that Satoshi Nakamoto's whitepaper proposed we go back to a limit system, and I don't disagree. When it's regarding money. But I don't see Waves as a currency, at least not in the long run. Not in the same way that Bitcoins, Monero, etc. are considered.
What makes the limited supply a good thing regarding a token platform like Waves?

Well I think there is quite a strong consensus on it in the cryptocurrency community. 

I think it makes sense from a valuation perspective but I think I understand what you are saying i.e. that if there is restricted supply then at some future point WAVES may become so expensive that it is difficult to do the things that are the purpose of the token? 

I think that is already becoming an issue with ETH.  Not sure there is a perfect solution.

It is kind of paradox.  You need something to have value in the markets to get the attention it needs to reach critical mass and be used. Restricted supply helps to do that but as you imply it may create inertia in the future.

One way is to constantly adjust fees (e.g. for transactions or token creation etc) but people are generally not good at dealing with decimals.

Interesting discussion.  Thank you:)
Pages:
Jump to: