when fund target are not met there will always be a problem, do not blame all projects that refused to pay bounty rewards, as a bounty hunter its always part of the risks too, my advice is never give up
Yes, giving up on hunting is indeed not a good choice, although hunting always has the risk of not being paid, but it is still better to do than not at all, only it needs research before hunting so that it is not wasted time we will use. 
Topic: We are only rich on spreadsheets - page 20. (Read 15302 times)
if the developer is not mature with publication, then there is no need to rush into campaigning.
there must be an allocation of funds for the repurchase process. Investors and hunters do not always care about prices, the market will not rebel violently if a larger allocation is held by the developer with various plans. Regarding spreadsheets and what happens in the campaign, it is still the responsibility of the developer, there needs to be an update in the campaign allocation plan that makes more sense so that it doesn't look like a dream seller.
there must be an allocation of funds for the repurchase process. Investors and hunters do not always care about prices, the market will not rebel violently if a larger allocation is held by the developer with various plans. Regarding spreadsheets and what happens in the campaign, it is still the responsibility of the developer, there needs to be an update in the campaign allocation plan that makes more sense so that it doesn't look like a dream seller.
Hate to say but is true. This is reality, when you think you will be rich after bounty end and then you receive reward. You got so much tokens and you have been calculate you will get so much money if you can sell on ICO price but the actual is the price token when listed on the market is totally low from ICO price. So you only received little amount of money beside you think you will got a lot of money... 
So true. I think everyone has experienced the same thing, where they think that they will get a lot of money by seeing the results they get on a spreadsheet and everyone must have counted how much they can get but when the tokens have been distributed and listed in exchange , we see there the price is very low and we feel what we do is just useless because the price is so far below.Almost all bounty hunters agree with this statement. since 2018 until now the number of tokens listed in the spreadsheet is like a shadow. but not necessarily able to enjoy according to what we have gotten. It is sad, even the bounty signature results have not been able to be sold because of market issues that have not been registered. Lol
that's why we don't focus too much on prices when joining a project if you don't want to be hurt
some project owners know that bounty hunters wont get the value they display as the bounty pool . they only use it to attract more participants to advertise thier projects. for those projects whose token would have given bounty hunters a reasonable amount they bring some irrelevant rules at the end just to deprive them.
Yes, that's what bounties these days make us. They show us big big rewards on their spreadsheets but the real values of those rewards they offer us are sometimes not even up to $5 on the market. I feel bounty hunters are only being used as baits by project owners to catch their investors virtually for free. What do you think guys ?
This is a tricky thing for Bounty Hunter. Most good project payments kill. Those who actually own the project need to look into it. So that Bounty Hunter can get their troubles in the least direct way. 
That's because new tokens only have high prices at the beginning of entering the market and when tokens bounty hunters are distributed, the prices of tokens on the market have gone down because investors have sold their tokens
Yes, that's what bounties these days make us. They show us big big rewards on their spreadsheets but the real values of those rewards they offer us are sometimes not even up to $5 on the market. I feel bounty hunters are only being used as baits by project owners to catch their investors virtually for free. What do you think guys ?
this is not news) but most likely bounty hunters are attracted as an auxiliary tool, not very important. and the reward is appropriate. But it happens (it used to be) that a coin after entering the market made very good pluses and then the hunter received good money. I had it with a few coins 
It is more about the projects themselves. The price of tokens which drops very much after listing, if any. Many projects simply collect some money and close.
Yes, it often happens at this time, many projects after collecting money and then closing because the team is unable to develop the project in accordance with the directions in the roadmap, that's what makes the project to close suddenly.
It is more about the projects themselves. The price of tokens which drops very much after listing, if any. Many projects simply collect some money and close.
Yes, that's what bounties these days make us. They show us big big rewards on their spreadsheets but the real values of those rewards they offer us are sometimes not even up to $5 on the market. I feel bounty hunters are only being used as baits by project owners to catch their investors virtually for free. What do you think guys ?
You are correct,i wish bounty hunters are been paid with fiat or stable digital currencies to avoid or erased all this disappointments, the only bounty project that cut my eye this days are stable coins like usdq because they are stable,no price dump or token becoming rather uselessWell some bounty campaigns are especially the good ones are paying btc to pay their hunters before nowadays since paying the manager and refilling the funds expensive so, the projects nowdays are paying with their own coin since there is no actual money has been spent only their tokens without value, and only they is the manager who will manage the bounty so, it's win to them and sadly a loss to us
when fund target are not met there will always be a problem, do not blame all projects that refused to pay bounty rewards, as a bounty hunter its always part of the risks too, my advice is never give up
Yes, that's what bounties these days make us. They show us big big rewards on their spreadsheets but the real values of those rewards they offer us are sometimes not even up to $5 on the market. I feel bounty hunters are only being used as baits by project owners to catch their investors virtually for free. What do you think guys ?
We are rich by bounty reward allocation. Whan spreadsheet is updated, bounty allocation is low. The reason is low amount of token sold out then listed exchange and rest of token release before bounty reward distribution. Then all blame on bounty hunters.Yes, that's what bounties these days make us. They show us big big rewards on their spreadsheets but the real values of those rewards they offer us are sometimes not even up to $5 on the market. I feel bounty hunters are only being used as baits by project owners to catch their investors virtually for free. What do you think guys ?
..It's actually funny that ones wealth is only seen on spreadsheets. This is majorly because bounty reward is in the projects tokens. The project in most cases outline a huge amount of tokens whose value seems lucrative, but on completion of the bounty, you find out that the reward is not tradable or trading at a ridiculous low rate as compared to the ICO price.
Your words make sense. Bounty projects have long been of little use to bounty hunters. Therefore, you should really look at things and not trust projects that offer a huge reward to each participant of the bounty.
One thing I've learnt over the years is to cut my expectations. A token is worth as much as it is in the market, not some proposed worth by the issuance of the tokens.
Yes, that's what bounties these days make us. They show us big big rewards on their spreadsheets but the real values of those rewards they offer us are sometimes not even up to $5 on the market. I feel bounty hunters are only being used as baits by project owners to catch their investors virtually for free. What do you think guys ?
I am feeling the same way which is also based on my own experience. There are lots of bounties that I have been through that have the same thing like what you have said. But not all bounties are like into that scenario. Maybe most of them but not all because there are still bounty projects that are true into what their project description was all about. I agree that bounty hunters are being used as a bait by the project owners to advertise their project to caught the attention of the crowd so that their project will get into popularity to make their project work successfully but in the end, all of the promises of rewards as a token of appreciation for the help and a job well done of bringing lots of investors to make their project to be successful just turns out to be all of a promise because right after that, the value of reward as stated in the project is in lower value in the market compared to what it was stated at the beginning to be given for the bounty hunters as a reward.
I feel you when you say that. I have done so many bounty campaigns but it is really sad that some really don't pay or some will just show how much we earn on the spreadsheets. Some give rewards but the rewards has no value at all. But still, keep the coin for future changes. We don't know if that coin will increase its value. Just keep moving.
The critic situation is the same almost in all kinds of bounty campaigns, they don't want to pay the bounty hunters. The deceived bounty hunters go to join all social media campaigns and do all tasks but there is no payment by the team with various excuses, unfortunately. 
I feel you when you say that. I have done so many bounty campaigns but it is really sad that some really don't pay or some will just show how much we earn on the spreadsheets. Some give rewards but the rewards has no value at all. But still, keep the coin for future changes. We don't know if that coin will increase its value. Just keep moving.
I seriously don't get your point because being rich on spreadsheets but not getting the rewards simply means that you weren't paid the reward written on the spreadsheet but I know that's not what you mean since you said that the actual value in exchanges is less than $5, if the value is low, then you are not rich in spreadsheets either, the only place it applies is when you have big tokens in spreadsheets that are worth much and the rewards were withheld by the team and not distributed to you.
Yes, that's what bounties these days make us. They show us big big rewards on their spreadsheets but the real values of those rewards they offer us are sometimes not even up to $5 on the market. I feel bounty hunters are only being used as baits by project owners to catch their investors virtually for free. What do you think guys ?
We are rich by bounty reward allocation. Whan spreadsheet is updated, bounty allocation is low. The reason is low amount of token sold out then listed exchange and rest of token release before bounty reward distribution. Then all blame on bounty hunters. Jump to: