Pages:
Author

Topic: WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested - page 49. (Read 115086 times)

hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
Ok guys OP has probably scammed me.

I sent my BTC for this round when the time hit 0 on the website. https://blockchain.info/tx/cc83657b55bfa8f5764b8e629f7e7c667769c7b0b4ab2c78729e15e0f9784978

Now I know it shows 3 seconds early on the blockchain but here's what I have to say.

1) In the previous round the first transaction was 2 seconds early on the blockchain and was still counted for and paid. This proves that the website and blockchain time are not perfectly in sync. So it is in fact possible that my transaction was sent when the site timer hit 0 and hence it should have been counted like in the previous round.

2) His script is NOT running perfectly and this is 100% clear from above posts. Again proves there might be a difference between site time and blockchain time.

3) Most importantly if my transaction was early why was it not counted in the previous round? It can either be in the previous round or this round. It cannot just disappear because a new round begins immediately after the previous round ends.

4) Since it was not counted in any round, OP just kept it. Basically scammed me 1 BTC.

5) Now he has stopped replying to my emails stating these facts.

6) Now I'm not asking for the 130% payment but I think it deserve a refund since the 1 BTC has just been kept by the OP.

If you guys feel I am right and the problem was with his site, please email, tweet and PM him to refund me the BTC he has tried scamming. Also please post here in support.


OPs twitter: https://twitter.com/RealWeeklyPonzi
OPs email: [email protected]
OPs PM: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=pm;sa=send;u=409927

The only valid point you have is the deposit should have been included in the prior game.    How do you know it wasn't?   Most games have some leftover and the OP has been keeping that.  

As for the site timer, it is off because your computer is off.  Set the time on your computer.  
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
Ok guys OP has probably scammed me.

I sent my BTC for this round when the time hit 0 on the website. https://blockchain.info/tx/cc83657b55bfa8f5764b8e629f7e7c667769c7b0b4ab2c78729e15e0f9784978

Now I know it shows 3 seconds early on the blockchain but here's what I have to say.

1) In the previous round the first transaction was 2 seconds early on the blockchain and was still counted for and paid. This proves that the website and blockchain time are not perfectly in sync. So it is in fact possible that my transaction was sent when the site timer hit 0 and hence it should have been counted like in the previous round.

2) His script is NOT running perfectly and this is 100% clear from above posts. Again proves there might be a difference between site time and blockchain time.

3) Most importantly if my transaction was early why was it not counted in the previous round? It can either be in the previous round or this round. It cannot just disappear because a new round begins immediately after the previous round ends.

4) Since it was not counted in any round, OP just kept it. Basically scammed me 1 BTC.

5) Now he has stopped replying to my emails stating these facts.

6) Now I'm not asking for the 130% payment but I think it deserve a refund since the 1 BTC has just been kept by the OP.

If you guys feel I am right and the problem was with his site, please email, tweet and PM him to refund me the BTC he has tried scamming. Also please post here in support.


OPs twitter: https://twitter.com/RealWeeklyPonzi
OPs email: [email protected]
OPs PM: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=pm;sa=send;u=409927
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
although i sent in at 00:00:02, i might not be paid? this is getting insane  Sad
https://blockchain.info/es/tx/8272904e0c35c15247a6ea6e5ef9a215a23c4f150ce515384f5df0b1dc1d47b6


Yeah I think this ponzi is dead.

This is just insane.

You missed out because you did not deposit btc within the first 1 second.



This guy, next in line is 00:00:00, probably won't be paid.
https://blockchain.info/tx/b8c60fce425ccbfc4ebd88212ad01ef132f56c5b07b4a9dbca8323e3042cbc01
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
although i sent in at 00:00:02, i might not be paid? this is getting insane  Sad
https://blockchain.info/es/tx/8272904e0c35c15247a6ea6e5ef9a215a23c4f150ce515384f5df0b1dc1d47b6


Yeah I think this ponzi is dead.

This is just insane.

You missed out because you did not deposit btc within the first 1 second.

hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
OP did you test your new script yet confirming it can detect to the milisecond when there's heavy flow of deposits ?

It is extremely doubtful that the script couldn't keep up with such a small amount of transactions.  Probably what happens is the IPN is looking at the transactions in order it sees, but it is a massive race state around the globe until the transactions are planted into the blockchain.  There are probably multiple versions of lists until a version is accepted by the node that blockchain uses.   Maybe they exist differently for a very long time.  

Additionally around GMT 00:00:00 I did a series of transactions.   There is a wide variation of when they are listed in the blockchain.   The lowest times I saw was 2 seconds, the longest was 6 seconds with most times either 3 to 4 seconds.  

Today the play out time period was less than 3 seconds, which is less than the variation seen in just sending transactions and when they end up on the blockchain.   At this point one would be better to just play a dice game since the overhead is lower and the results are mostly random.   ~1% for a dice game vs 6.5% for the Ponzi, based on the deposits.    

In his twitter, he mentioned he is going to use the blockchain timestamp, so that should fix the issue. but today everything was a mess.

It doesn't fix the issue, it just removes another layer of confusion.   It is still somewhat random.   One can control when they start the transaction, but how much time it takes for the transaction to appear on the blockchain can't be controlled.   So you still could be the best at timing and lose because the node the handled the transaction was slow sending the transaction to other nodes.  

The only thing you can do to help it is to run your own bitcoin node.   Even that will only reduce the variability.   You are still depended on what the other nodes connected to your node are doing and what kind of network connections exist.  

The payout window tomorrow will probably be less than two seconds.    Trying to hit that window will take a good start and luck.  It is pretty risky for small 30% return where you can lose everything.   If the payout window was 4 or 5 seconds wide, you would just be betting on your own timing.  The problem is you can't control how long the transaction will take to get to listed.    
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
OP did you test your new script yet confirming it can detect to the milisecond when there's heavy flow of deposits ?

It is extremely doubtful that the script couldn't keep up with such a small amount of transactions.  Probably what happens is the IPN is looking at the transactions in order it sees, but it is a massive race state around the globe until the transactions are planted into the blockchain.  There are probably multiple versions of lists until a version is accepted by the node that blockchain uses.   Maybe they exist differently for a very long time.  

Additionally around GMT 00:00:00 I did a series of transactions.   There is a wide variation of when they are listed in the blockchain.   The lowest times I saw was 2 seconds, the longest was 6 seconds with most times either 3 to 4 seconds.  

Today the play out time period was less than 3 seconds, which is less than the variation seen in just sending transactions and when they end up on the blockchain.   At this point one would be better to just play a dice game since the overhead is lower and the results are mostly random.   ~1% for a dice game vs 6.5% for the Ponzi, based on the deposits.    

In his twitter, he mentioned he is going to use the blockchain timestamp, so that should fix the issue. but today everything was a mess.

im not gonna make any deposits tomorrow. gonna monitor first.

i think that's a good idea.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
OP did you test your new script yet confirming it can detect to the milisecond when there's heavy flow of deposits ?

It is extremely doubtful that the script couldn't keep up with such a small amount of transactions.  Probably what happens is the IPN is looking at the transactions in order it sees, but it is a massive race state around the globe until the transactions are planted into the blockchain.  There are probably multiple versions of lists until a version is accepted by the node that blockchain uses.   Maybe they exist differently for a very long time.  

Additionally around GMT 00:00:00 I did a series of transactions.   There is a wide variation of when they are listed in the blockchain.   The lowest times I saw was 2 seconds, the longest was 6 seconds with most times either 3 to 4 seconds.  

Today the play out time period was less than 3 seconds, which is less than the variation seen in just sending transactions and when they end up on the blockchain.   At this point one would be better to just play a dice game since the overhead is lower and the results are mostly random.   ~1% for a dice game vs 6.5% for the Ponzi, based on the deposits.    

In his twitter, he mentioned he is going to use the blockchain timestamp, so that should fix the issue. but today everything was a mess.

im not gonna make any deposits tomorrow. gonna monitor first.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
OP did you test your new script yet confirming it can detect to the milisecond when there's heavy flow of deposits ?

It is extremely doubtful that the script couldn't keep up with such a small amount of transactions.  Probably what happens is the IPN is looking at the transactions in order it sees, but it is a massive race state around the globe until the transactions are planted into the blockchain.  There are probably multiple versions of lists until a version is accepted by the node that blockchain uses.   Maybe they exist differently for a very long time.  

Additionally around GMT 00:00:00 I did a series of transactions.   There is a wide variation of when they are listed in the blockchain.   The lowest times I saw was 2 seconds, the longest was 6 seconds with most times either 3 to 4 seconds.  

Today the play out time period was less than 3 seconds, which is less than the variation seen in just sending transactions and when they end up on the blockchain.   At this point one would be better to just play a dice game since the overhead is lower and the results are mostly random.   ~1% for a dice game vs 6.5% for the Ponzi, based on the deposits.    

In his twitter, he mentioned he is going to use the blockchain timestamp, so that should fix the issue. but today everything was a mess.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
OP is not replying to my emails. If you are reading this please reply!
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
fk this bullsh1t i will never play this ponzi again u better gamble on blackjack or roulette or play this nonsense

If you wanna play some blackjack http://paycoinjack.pw/
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
OP did you test your new script yet confirming it can detect to the milisecond when there's heavy flow of deposits ?

It is extremely doubtful that the script couldn't keep up with such a small amount of transactions.  Probably what happens is the IPN is looking at the transactions in order it sees, but it is a massive race state around the globe until the transactions are planted into the blockchain.  There are probably multiple versions of lists until a version is accepted by the node that blockchain uses.   Maybe they exist differently for a very long time.  

Additionally around GMT 00:00:00 I did a series of transactions.   There is a wide variation of when they are listed in the blockchain.   The lowest times I saw was 2 seconds, the longest was 6 seconds with most times either 3 to 4 seconds.  

Today the play out time period was less than 3 seconds, which is less than the variation seen in just sending transactions and when they end up on the blockchain.   At this point one would be better to just play a dice game since the overhead is lower and the results are mostly random.   ~1% for a dice game vs 6.5% for the Ponzi, based on the deposits.    
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000
https://www.bitworks.io
fk this bullsh1t i will never play this ponzi again u better gamble on blackjack or roulette or play this nonsense

Based on how you you've been playing (from your talk on the thread) I am fairly sure you are in the black in a big way overall even if you have had some rough patches.. Sure 30% lose but that is the name of the game...
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
fk this bullsh1t i will never play this ponzi again u better gamble on blackjack or roulette or play this nonsense
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000
https://www.bitworks.io
OP did you test your new script yet confirming it can detect to the milisecond when there's heavy flow of deposits ?

This is exactly what I want to know, thanks!

Ummmm, the protocol itself doesn't provide that kind of precision, at least the OP now has the timestamps agreeing with blockchain.info.

In short the best that can be done is within a second, anything more assumptions need to be made about received time however that is dependent upon the source of the TX and how it is broadcast to the network.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
Ok OP emailed me saying that he fixed the script for the next rounds. See below

"... the good news is I just managed to read the time from Blockchain
in the API. So basically, starting from tomorrow's round payments will be
paid according EXACTLY to the blockchain time. You can let the thread know
that I have changed the code to read the time from blockchain.info
EXACTLY.

These issues will never occur again.
"

when is the payouts going out?
and can OP post on this thread yet?

payouts were long done

i think op is still banned . You can check updates on his twitter : https://twitter.com/RealWeeklyPonzi/
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1002
Ok OP emailed me saying that he fixed the script for the next rounds. See below

"... the good news is I just managed to read the time from Blockchain
in the API. So basically, starting from tomorrow's round payments will be
paid according EXACTLY to the blockchain time. You can let the thread know
that I have changed the code to read the time from blockchain.info
EXACTLY.

These issues will never occur again.
"

when is the payouts going out?
and can OP post on this thread yet?

update: I lost 2 btc in this ponzi.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
i called this yesterday, with weekly u can get more chance but instead you guys keep choosing and vote for 24 hours, see this is what i meant

3 seconds was the last to be paid, what about tommorow?people are getting smarter and faster by the day Cheesy

I have been there with you. The people wanting it to get shorter will soon see the volume keep dropping and seeing how you will have to be in the first second heck that might not even do it.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
i called this yesterday, with weekly u can get more chance but instead you guys keep choosing and vote for 24 hours, see this is what i meant

3 seconds was the last to be paid, what about tommorow?people are getting smarter and faster by the day Cheesy

I vote for hourly ponzi then , mite as well since its only a 3 second game .
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
i called this yesterday, with weekly u can get more chance but instead you guys keep choosing and vote for 24 hours, see this is what i meant

3 seconds was the last to be paid, what about tommorow?people are getting smarter and faster by the day Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
I think OP is right about that this game should not last 3 seconds. If people would reinvest, everyone would make more profit, as other people would also be willing to put money if there is a circulation.

problem is people aren't willing to risk it (and by people i mean my self included). so that changes the game . So it mite as well be a hourly ponzi.
Pages:
Jump to: