Topic: What Actually Drives People/Gov to Adopt New and Bold Decisions - page 2. (Read 655 times)

I wish this were true, but it can only be true in some countries. There are countries where the leaders do not care if the country or its citizens get better. The whole country can be burning for all they care as far as their accounts will get fat.

Illiteracy and poverty is a very strong tool for politicians. They can country the masses if the masses don't need them so they make sure the masses are never free.
The leaders keep giving them crumbs so they keep coming back for more.
During campaigns, they promised them electricity and better transport systems and better education and security, blah blah blah. Now imagine if all these things are already what these people have and they have good jobs that pay them well, what would these politicians use as bargaining chips to win votes?

There is no single country in the world that can be completely independent which is why there is international trade. allies, helping the underdeveloped country financially and thousands of others which all nothing means they need one other to keep running their government but the influence of one country depends on their financial and military state.

Now, talking about the people what else choice do they have?

If you are against the policy you can vote against it but it is not going to stop them from ruling which is the power/flaw of democracy. And people are even tired of their day-to-day life by chasing money to pay their bills and meet financial requirements so they don't actually have time to think beyond themselves.

In case there are some people go intense then they will be badged as terrorist groups by the government.

I was about giving my answer as change is the reason why we adopt new decisions that sometimes goes against what we already are used to. Change is good because it gives us another ideology of things we thought we knew. Influence is another reason why we choose to accept new ideas because influence form those we adore can change our minds when we didn't have plans to accept the new ideas. Influence can come in different ways like through power or money.

We're humans and we have emotions that can be easily influenced by what the masses what, for example not everyone is okay with some of the new rules that are been passed in their country but because the masses are accepting the changes, they too have to join them.

Well, peace is underrated but we have to accept the truth that this world is being run by greed, money and power. That's it.

We want peace but peace means money for the majority. It's like it's going to need a century again so that we'll be back into the ancient times where some communities and countries have lived in peace and harmony.

But then, can't also remove the fact that wars were there. We people just want all the best for us and that mindset coming from people to government is upgrading and coming to the point of dominating other lands too.

I do agree with you. The thing is both ways have pros and cons. For example, if we decide to stay with what we are comfortable is (which let's be real here, a lot of people do due to the safety we feel from being familiar with it and knowing what's to come) then there is the cons and risk of losing an opportunity that brings a change that could have made things better. However, if we decide to take the risk of change and welcome it, there is the negative side of bad outcomes and danger that could have been avoided if we just stick with what we know.

Hence, in this situation wherein it is difficult to make a decision by choosing, analyzing, and laying out possible outcomes for both gives a better understanding of the options you have.

Nonetheless, I'm sure there are other factors that influence people's decisions on whether or not they wanna stick with what they know or learn something new.

We, including myself, are fond of the familiar. Comparable to ordering the same dish every time you dine out. Why? Because we recognise it and enjoy it

But here's the problem - and I've witnessed this in real estate, businesses, and everywhere else - there is a fear of the unknown. Now, it's not completely baseless; it has some foundation. In organisations and families, a constant equilibrium exists, correct? You are balancing the known with the unknown. But, and this is where I believe we part ways, I believe that the unknown can sometimes be... exciting? A challenge? You choose the term

However, decisions are difficult. People have made countless decisions. But perhaps the time has come for us to view change not as a dark cloud, but as a golden opportunity pounding on our doors

It is not only the government that do hesitate to make or implement new decisions. It is the nature of man to always continue with what he knows how to do whether it is bringing the best result or not. Man by nature hates changes, especially when they don't know the outcome of that change.
This is the reason why even in organisations and families, it takes an extra mind to implement any decisions.  We are willing to rely and continue doing what we know how to do without having issues.

Most likely, people tend to adopt new and bold decisions whenever they want some positive changes in their lives. Maybe they have been living a miserable life because of financial struggles, so by taking risk into new things that could make their lives greatly changed, could be a good decision that they’ll never regret in the end. It could be money and power as that’s the mostly seen highly important to people nowadays, because without it, survival could be put at a high risk.

when there's impending doom of course it will force to make drastic decisions, i could foresee the upcoming climate change might force drastic decision when the impact finally showing more clearly.
right now its just showing slowly.
same thing with money, if a country could increase income drastically they'd even take advantage of their own resources, selling raw material, for the sake of getting more income, its even worst when it comes to third world country, they would take advantage of their natural resources, without thinking the aftermath, what matter for them is right now and filling their own pocket. don't even care even if their country is doomed in the future, as long as they could buy that lambo.

Bitcoin is viewed negatively by any government at first As a result, there was a conflict between the people and the government, and many steps were taken to stop Bitcoin. Later, when the people were able to earn a lot, the government declared Bitcoin legal and accelerated its development By making Bitcoin profits, different countries are considering Bitcoin as the source of various problems, but actually it is not true. To run the country, the government and the people should have a good idea about Bitcoin.The trend of getting rich is making people selfish day by day, resulting in inequality between the rich and the poor
Between the rich and the poor, it is natural that the rich will win because they have more money


There are a lot of things to accept to stay and everyone should think something according to the situation.All government is bad this is wrong because government thinks of whole, but we think of individual that's why we tell ourselves that government is not doing anything for us when actually government is thinking of whole

One should always try to improve oneself because the improvement in oneself will reflect the improvement in the government
Money and power are inextricably linked without each other progress is not possible and unimaginable as money is as important as power through money we gain power.Economic and social factors must be considered before every decision is taken, then success is possible sooner

To meet the challenge, the government always takes innovative and bold steps which are water welfare
Digital technology and values ​​enable new decision-making

Any development can be accelerated by effective decision making between government and people.

Power and money are also still the goals of many people today, so everyone will use various ways to achieve them in their life. But some people would prefer to achieve this in good ways so as not to destroy other people because power is part of human existence in this world, while money is part of human strength in life so that these two things are still the main goal of every human being in this world.

Everyone has ambition and not everyone can hold it because everyone has targets and goals that they must achieve in their life. But if there are people who want to reduce the dominance of their ambitions in life, it is people who are very wise by not setting power goals for their lives even though they are still looking for money to make ends meet.

The ultimate goal is to maintain its existence, either as an individual or a country. Money and power are the tools used to achieve these goals, regarding competition and domination over others are an integral part of achieving goals. Some Individuals and Countries will put peace first, they prioritize their ambition to rule and gain profits.

All these complex problems, can only be overcome by holding back a little ambition to dominate others and put peace first, that's better.

You are pretty much right here. The very reason why influential countries are influential and strong is due to the wealth of that country. The wealthier the country is the higher their status gets, putting other countries that are below them to look up to them and be influenced by them. Politics and power even relate to wealth if you think about it.

World Inequality Report shows an increase in the total wealth of top income earners globally over the last few years. The increase in wealth was more evidence in 2021, of course, as there was more money circulating in the economy. Nonetheless, the trend continued for 2022: https://wir2022.wid.world/executive-summary/

In summary: Global wealth inequality exists and has existed for centuries. It was only over the last century that a robust middle class began to form globally. And in 2020-2021, the middle class regressed, as evident by the increase in total global wealth that billionaires own (up 1.5% from 2% at the start of 2020, which is to say that billionaires owned 3.5% of total global household wealth post COVID-19)

Pharma, e-commerce platforms like Amazon, etc. all escaped the pandemic with middle class wealth.

Everything kind of a boils down to money to be honest. People, countries, big corporations, governments – all chasing the same one thing, money. Money that gives you power and lets you control everything. It's like we're hardwired to compete and dominate, especially when dollar signs are involved. Sure, there's politics, power, and all that jazz, but money's the main tune. If these people hear that there is opportunity in making some quick bucks, they will all run towards there and compete with each other. They will be the first one to take bold decisions. Why do you think most people are trying to adopt crypto currencies? It's because people can make nice profit by investing in crypto or working with crypto. If all crypto currencies were stable coins, I doubt we would be seeing more people interested/using crypto. They would all stick to fiat currency.

I think that these two have pretty much the same reason that drives them to adopt new things which is benefit of the change to them, the only difference I think is that the government needs to make sure that to some degree, the benefit should be cost efficient and that it can line their pockets well if they're the corrupt kind. Now others say it's money and power or something tangible but I think it all boils down to just benefits imo, it's not worth adopting or embracing if we know that it's not going benefit us right?

We live in a world with a growing population and diminishing resources. A lot of governments and powerful people realize that and they are trying to find ways to feed their "voters" and also to provide energy and water.

The people (voters) keep them in power and they pay taxes.... the taxes pay their salaries, so they will do anything to keep the voters happy, so that they can benefit from that. (The powerful people behind them, want to make money from the resources that are provided... and some even pay huge bribes to the government officials to gain access to those resources) 

Sometimes there are indeed many policies from the government that do not benefit the small community, but it all returns to dirty politics carried out by a handful of individuals for personal gain, so that many people are at a disadvantage, I think in poor countries or developing countries it is difficult to overcome, because many governments are corrupt so that laws like this are born.
And even if we work hard, we still depend on government policies regarding wages and also the price of basic commodities which will affect whether or not the people at the bottom are adequacy, that is a problem, I think, that has no solution.

I believe that is what a lot of people forget, most countries are part of an international organization that has the authority to influence and intervene in a country's decisions and policies. Moreover, going against the policies there international organizations have may lead to cutting connections and good partnerships with other countries that are essential in maintaining security and economic power.

I don't have a problem with new laws because they really debated them, but what I want is to prioritize those laws that can help all people. What I mean is that they ease the burden of people, like subsidies or financial aid, because prices right now keep increasing, or they will find a way to stop the increase of prices by putting some subsidies on them, which can greatly help us. Right now, we have nothing to do but work hard and smartly by finding another source of income to cope with this difficult life.