Topic: What happens to unshared bounty tokens? - page 8. (Read 6466 times)
I believe that unshared bounty tokens usually goes to the bounty managers . It's an easy way to earn additional money and most managers don't miss such an excellent opportunity to earn extra money . Managers are people too and they also need money, nothing personal
Often, such tokens simply burn, but I had occasions when they were distributed among the participants who met all the requirements - and this was my most profitable bounty. I think it is fair.
That's also what I've learned from most campaign, they allocate every spare tokens as a bonus for those who Excel or who did their job well, and most of the time they just do nothing but to keep those spare and bring it back to the original coin fundings, there's no exact answer I guess but always depends from the team itself.
unfortunately, every ico/bounty handles it differently. some projects make sure that everything is 100% fair. in other projects, the dev team does not care if you get a few tokens more or less. such teams retain the undisbursed tokens.
I have experienced this, so I checked the telegram group to make sure the admin and bounty manager can do their best. the problem is that there are many bounty managers who have not handed over the total stake gained by the participants and I check the announcement when the distribution is done.
Often, such tokens simply burn, but I had occasions when they were distributed among the participants who met all the requirements - and this was my most profitable bounty. I think it is fair.
Most of the campaigns I joined only makes the final computation after the team closed the window for completion of all tasks required to receive bounty. Only then they will distribute tokens according to total stakes of legit participants.
In some campaigns, undistributed tokens goes back to the reserve pool.
In some campaigns, undistributed tokens goes back to the reserve pool.
I often question that and honestly I am very curious about the answer but I think there is actually no right answer because everything can change at any time, so I decided to wait and if it doesn't change anything then I will try to forget it
Have you ever asked yourself this question?
What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?
In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.
This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?
The team will keep the tokens by their own if someone can't pass KYC or something even after completing the post require8for getting rewards but when someone don't meet the requirements they can be disqualified from stake calculation. What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?
In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.
This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?
Have you ever asked yourself this question?
What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?
In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.
This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?
What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?
In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.
This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?
In my own understanding, for what is happening to unshared bounty token, it goes to the BM in my own opinion.
It is on the jurisdiction of the BM on how are He going to do it. Because the only token that will be burn is the unsold token, not the bounty allocated in the campaign.
As to my own opinion
I think what happened to all unshared token is that, it will be burned or even shared among the teams for a better use of it or probably locked for some certain reason(s).
I think what happened to all unshared token is that, it will be burned or even shared among the teams for a better use of it or probably locked for some certain reason(s).
That is well said by the author. This is why every bounty manager should try as much as possible to remove the cheaters in the cause of the campaign, so that those who actually did the work in the right way, will get their tokens.
Then if the campaign ends and there are still some detected, it will be best for the stakes allocated to the cheaters be removed from the overall total stakes and then go ahead to allocate the tokens.
Then if the campaign ends and there are still some detected, it will be best for the stakes allocated to the cheaters be removed from the overall total stakes and then go ahead to allocate the tokens.
I have every experienced it for several times. At this time, we have no choice to make it better. I have participated in some bounties and some of them were scam or even failed. Then, I didn't get the tokens or coins. This is one of the risks that we can face. Therefore, we must have better and more careful strategy in choosing the right bounty.
They will burn unsold and not distributed tokens. So they will reduce the total circulating tokens and that means higher possible price for 1 token.
Have you ever asked yourself this question?
What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?
In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.
This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?
What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?
In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.
This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?
If there is a specific bounty campaign budget, some projects divide it to participants. Others, burn the remaining unclaimed tokens to increase the value of the coin in the market. Somehow I agree with you but again, this solely depends on the team running the project.
Have you ever asked yourself this question?
What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?
In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.
This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?
It is done intentionally to give out little tokens to bounty participants, they know what they are doing, a good bounty manager would have removed and disqualified undeserving participants before sharing stakes if otherwise then the manager and the team did it to reduce token to be given. What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?
In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.
This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?
I think most of the unshared token will be burned but sometime I think it will be give to the bounty manager who manage the bounty campaign. I mostly encounter this kind of situation where there are many tokens left but there are time that the project team will take it and then they will locked it.
Have you ever asked yourself this question?
What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?
In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.
This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?
I think it happen in two different things! if the distribution is done with the team ofcourse the unallocated tokens will stay to them and if the distribution was done from any Bounty marketing company im sure it will stay to them thats why sometimes some unspent or balance token was used again for another round of Bounty. thats only my analogy about the situation. What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?
In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.
This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?
Had an experience, that after all what you mentioned, tokens were recalculated in accordance with new stakes.
But it was exceptional case.
Officially tokens must be burned. Unofficially they are spitted between bounty managers and devs (IMHO)
But it was exceptional case.
Officially tokens must be burned. Unofficially they are spitted between bounty managers and devs (IMHO)
I think each team from each project has a different reason, but the reason that often arises when tokens are not shared is due to bad market conditions, and they wait for the right time to share them and enter a stock exchange.
I think it's all just their excuse not to share gifts and wait for all that to be good, if the tokens they have are of good quality on the market, they need not be afraid to share them with bounty hunters, because I think if there are no hunters, project awards they will never succeed. From my experience, undistributed tokens from bounty campaigns were either considered as unsold tokens and burned or they were returned to reserves.
Those tokens should be redistributed to the legit bounty hunters.
Those tokens should be redistributed to the legit bounty hunters.
Correct, mostly if ICO have allocated tokens for bounties and not distributed for some reason, they are usually burned by the projects.
As far as cheating though, those bounty hunters are just wasting their time. They're going to regret because I'm sure that it's difficult to swallow that at the end of all the hard work you've done, you will not received your tokens. Moral lesson, don't cheat and follow the rules.
Jump to: