What speed are your getting CPU mining TENEBRIX? - page 5.

Lolcust

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 11

Hillariously voracious

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Lolcust on October 05, 2011, 03:22:24 PM

Quote from: tacotime on October 05, 2011, 03:20:10 PM

I just got like 10 proofs of work (including one for 10 trillion TBX) trying to port this directly to another linux box... beeeee careful when you make the binaries lolcust.

Um, you mean you just copypasted the binaries built on one linux block to another lin and it misbehaved ? Or is something more sinister afoot ?

Also, AFAIK the max coinage a chain can deal with is around 130 billions....

Hmmm... yous got me curious about max coin.... wonder what happens when that gets reached. Alright lolcust, here might be a fun testnet test for you, start up a testnet with just a smidge less than the max pre-mined and let us know what happens :-D

I think I will, when I sort out a few things with updating TBX and GG with a bunch of Good Things and fixes, and some other things.

I think clients will just crash

Quote from: ?? on ??

Also, is the limiting factor something like max integer size? If so the problem should be resolved as computers move from 32 to 64 then to 128 bit word sizes etc.

Yes, exactly, though I'm being told that the problem could be solved even before we move to 128 bit processors, just currently there exists no urgent need for a blockchain with 200+ billion coins in it.

It's not like anyone is starting DollarCoins, with guaranteed USD equivalence ~__^

bulanula

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: Lolcust on October 05, 2011, 03:22:24 PM

Quote from: tacotime on October 05, 2011, 03:20:10 PM

I just got like 10 proofs of work (including one for 10 trillion TBX) trying to port this directly to another linux box... beeeee careful when you make the binaries lolcust.

Um, you mean you just copypasted the binaries built on one linux block to another lin and it misbehaved ? Or is something more sinister afoot ?

Also, AFAIK the max coinage a chain can deal with is around 130 billions....

OK thank you !

At least I can mine this now but SC2 is not available but he keeps saying soon for like weeks etc. Who knows etc.

Lolcust

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 11

Hillariously voracious

Quote from: tacotime on October 05, 2011, 03:20:10 PM

I just got like 10 proofs of work (including one for 10 trillion TBX) trying to port this directly to another linux box... beeeee careful when you make the binaries lolcust.

Um, you mean you just copypasted the binaries built on one linux box to another lin and it misbehaved ? Or is something more sinister afoot ?

Also, AFAIK the max coinage a chain can deal with is around 130 billions....

tacotime

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1005

I just got like 10 proofs of work (including one for 10 trillion TBX) trying to port this directly to another linux box... beeeee careful when you make the binaries lolcust.

Lolcust

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 11

Hillariously voracious

Quote from: bulanula on October 05, 2011, 03:14:02 PM

Quote from: Lolcust on October 05, 2011, 03:08:15 PM

Quote from: bulanula on October 05, 2011, 03:04:30 PM

Quote from: tacotime on October 05, 2011, 02:53:57 PM

So, I remade with gcc-4.6.1 and there is no actual performance increase... not sure what is going on exactly.

edit: never mind, had to recompile with CFLAGS="-march=amdfam10 -O3" ./configure
and then with gcc-4.6.1

Now I'm at 3.40kh/s!! thanks!!

Man you guys are just murdering my stupid 2600K crappy Intel silicon. I want some of the love please !

Poster a few posts back : how did you get 1.66 khash/s per thread on the 2600K !? I only get around 1.15 khash/s per thread on my crappy chip.

Bulanula, are you on win or on Linux ? I'm about to pull an experimental Tenebrix Minerd optimization by ArtForz that is tailored to 64 bit linuxes (completely untested on win)
Can squeeze out up to 30% more.

Dude this is what I am waiting for LOL. This crappy 2600K is wayyy too slow for this high difficulty. I'm on Windows now but I also do Linux etc.

Well, I will do a branch from main Tenebrix-minerd tomorrow (the optimization is too experimental to throw it into the main, IMHO). I'll PM you when it's done.

General advice is to build it on Lin64 since that's where Art was getting good results, it's currently verily experimental so take care.

bulanula

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: Lolcust on October 05, 2011, 03:08:15 PM

Quote from: bulanula on October 05, 2011, 03:04:30 PM

Quote from: tacotime on October 05, 2011, 02:53:57 PM

So, I remade with gcc-4.6.1 and there is no actual performance increase... not sure what is going on exactly.

edit: never mind, had to recompile with CFLAGS="-march=amdfam10 -O3" ./configure
and then with gcc-4.6.1

Now I'm at 3.40kh/s!! thanks!!

Man you guys are just murdering my stupid 2600K crappy Intel silicon. I want some of the love please !

Poster a few posts back : how did you get 1.66 khash/s per thread on the 2600K !? I only get around 1.15 khash/s per thread on my crappy chip.

Bulanula, are you on win or on Linux ? I'm about to pull an experimental Tenebrix Minerd optimization by ArtForz that is tailored to 64 bit linuxes (completely untested on win)
Can squeeze out up to 30% more.

Dude this is what I am waiting for LOL. This crappy 2600K is wayyy too slow for this high difficulty. I'm on Windows now but I also do Linux etc.

Lolcust

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 11

Hillariously voracious

Quote from: bulanula on October 05, 2011, 03:04:30 PM

Quote from: tacotime on October 05, 2011, 02:53:57 PM

So, I remade with gcc-4.6.1 and there is no actual performance increase... not sure what is going on exactly.

edit: never mind, had to recompile with CFLAGS="-march=amdfam10 -O3" ./configure
and then with gcc-4.6.1

Now I'm at 3.40kh/s!! thanks!!

Man you guys are just murdering my stupid 2600K crappy Intel silicon. I want some of the love please !

Poster a few posts back : how did you get 1.66 khash/s per thread on the 2600K !? I only get around 1.15 khash/s per thread on my crappy chip.

Bulanula, are you on win or on Linux ? I'm about to pull an experimental Tenebrix Minerd optimization by ArtForz that is tailored to 64 bit linuxes (completely untested on win)
Can squeeze out up to 30% more.

bulanula

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: tacotime on October 05, 2011, 02:53:57 PM

So, I remade with gcc-4.6.1 and there is no actual performance increase... not sure what is going on exactly.

edit: never mind, had to recompile with CFLAGS="-march=amdfam10 -O3" ./configure
and then with gcc-4.6.1

Now I'm at 3.40kh/s!! thanks!!

Man you guys are just murdering my stupid 2600K crappy Intel silicon. I want some of the love please !

Poster a few posts back : how did you get 1.66 khash/s per thread on the 2600K !? I only get around 1.15 khash/s per thread on my crappy chip.

tacotime

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1005

So, I remade with gcc-4.6.1 and there is no actual performance increase... not sure what is going on exactly.

edit: never mind, had to recompile with CFLAGS="-march=amdfam10 -O3" ./configure
and then with gcc-4.6.1

Now I'm at 3.40kh/s!! thanks!!

tacotime

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1005

Quote from: ArtForz on October 05, 2011, 01:57:50 PM

model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1100T Processor
cpu MHz : 3600.000

gcc -v
gcc version 4.6.1 (Debian 4.6.1-13)

uname -a
Linux buildhost 3.0.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Sep 20 07:03:13 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Code:

./configure
make
./minerd --userpass artforz.1:1 --url http://pool.simplecoin.us:8337/ --threads 5
[2011-10-05 20:48:59] Long-polling activated for http://pool.simplecoin.us:8337/LP
[2011-10-05 20:49:03] 5 miner threads started, using SHA256 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2011-10-05 20:49:22] thread 0: 63077 hashes, 2.67 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:49:23] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
[2011-10-05 20:49:24] thread 1: 65535 hashes, 2.67 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:49:25] thread 2: 65535 hashes, 2.67 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:49:26] thread 3: 65535 hashes, 2.66 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:49:27] thread 4: 65535 hashes, 2.67 khash/sec

Code:

CFLAGS="-O3" ./configure
make clean; make
./minerd --userpass artforz.1:1 --url http://pool.simplecoin.us:8337/ --threads 5
[2011-10-05 20:50:11] Long-polling activated for http://pool.simplecoin.us:8337/LP
[2011-10-05 20:50:16] 5 miner threads started, using SHA256 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2011-10-05 20:50:32] thread 0: 65535 hashes, 3.21 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:50:33] thread 1: 65535 hashes, 3.23 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:50:33] thread 2: 65535 hashes, 3.24 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:50:34] thread 3: 65535 hashes, 3.24 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:50:36] thread 4: 65535 hashes, 3.22 khash/sec

Code:

CFLAGS="-march=amdfam10 -O3" ./configure
make clean; make
./minerd --userpass artforz.1:1 --url http://pool.simplecoin.us:8337/ --threads 5
[2011-10-05 20:51:22] Long-polling activated for http://pool.simplecoin.us:8337/LP
[2011-10-05 20:51:26] 5 miner threads started, using SHA256 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2011-10-05 20:51:42] thread 0: 65535 hashes, 3.27 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:51:42] thread 1: 65535 hashes, 3.27 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:51:43] thread 2: 65535 hashes, 3.27 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:51:44] thread 3: 65535 hashes, 3.28 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:51:45] thread 4: 65535 hashes, 3.29 khash/sec

Hey, got a problem, just got a proof of result true but I didn't get the block in tenebrix, what's going on???

my configuration file is this:

Code:

{
	"_comment1" : "Any long-format command line argument ",
	"_comment2" : "may be used in this JSON configuration file",

	"url" : "http://127.0.0.1:8697",
	"user" : "1",
	"pass" : "1",

	"algo" : "scrypt",
	"threads" : "6",

	"quiet" : "off"
}

Where is my block? Sad

edit: Nevermind, linux is just slow, I got it!

also:

Code:

gcc -v
gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) 
uname -a
Linux user 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

bulanula

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Damn it !!! How can I optimize my crap 2600K !?

You folks with AMD Phenom II at 3.6 GHz getting 16 khash/s on only 5 cores
Me with Intel 2600K at 4.2 GHz getting 9 khash/s on all 8 threads

Fuck Intel !

ArtForz

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 257

Quote from: tacotime on October 05, 2011, 10:32:12 AM

I will compile tenebrix on linux and try that right now, thanks

edit: There is a bug possibly

Quote

./configure: line 4888: syntax error near unexpected token `,'
./configure: line 4888: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.10.1, ,'

That's a problem inherited from cpuminer, some distros *cough*redhat*cough* don't package libcurl.m4 in curl-dev which causes exactly this :/
You can easily get around it by commenting these lines out though, since pretty much everyone with linux is running curl already
[/quote]

Quote from: tacotime on October 05, 2011, 10:32:12 AM

That's about a +0.85 KH/s boost per core, so now I'm getting 16kh/s on my 1055T

model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1100T Processor
cpu MHz : 3600.000

gcc -v
gcc version 4.6.1 (Debian 4.6.1-13)

uname -a
Linux buildhost 3.0.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Sep 20 07:03:13 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Code:

./configure
make
./minerd --userpass artforz.1:1 --url http://pool.simplecoin.us:8337/ --threads 5
[2011-10-05 20:48:59] Long-polling activated for http://pool.simplecoin.us:8337/LP
[2011-10-05 20:49:03] 5 miner threads started, using SHA256 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2011-10-05 20:49:22] thread 0: 63077 hashes, 2.67 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:49:23] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
[2011-10-05 20:49:24] thread 1: 65535 hashes, 2.67 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:49:25] thread 2: 65535 hashes, 2.67 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:49:26] thread 3: 65535 hashes, 2.66 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:49:27] thread 4: 65535 hashes, 2.67 khash/sec

Code:

CFLAGS="-O3" ./configure
make clean; make
./minerd --userpass artforz.1:1 --url http://pool.simplecoin.us:8337/ --threads 5
[2011-10-05 20:50:11] Long-polling activated for http://pool.simplecoin.us:8337/LP
[2011-10-05 20:50:16] 5 miner threads started, using SHA256 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2011-10-05 20:50:32] thread 0: 65535 hashes, 3.21 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:50:33] thread 1: 65535 hashes, 3.23 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:50:33] thread 2: 65535 hashes, 3.24 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:50:34] thread 3: 65535 hashes, 3.24 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:50:36] thread 4: 65535 hashes, 3.22 khash/sec

Code:

CFLAGS="-march=amdfam10 -O3" ./configure
make clean; make
./minerd --userpass artforz.1:1 --url http://pool.simplecoin.us:8337/ --threads 5
[2011-10-05 20:51:22] Long-polling activated for http://pool.simplecoin.us:8337/LP
[2011-10-05 20:51:26] 5 miner threads started, using SHA256 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2011-10-05 20:51:42] thread 0: 65535 hashes, 3.27 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:51:42] thread 1: 65535 hashes, 3.27 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:51:43] thread 2: 65535 hashes, 3.27 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:51:44] thread 3: 65535 hashes, 3.28 khash/sec
[2011-10-05 20:51:45] thread 4: 65535 hashes, 3.29 khash/sec

Bobnova

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

I'll give that a shot when I get home today, thanks!

tacotime

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1005

Quote from: ArtForz on October 05, 2011, 10:19:46 AM

Quote from: tacotime on October 04, 2011, 07:17:00 PM

1.80kh/s per core, 1055t and 940be at 3.8ghz
1055ts are the cpu to buy to mine tenebrix, they are 120$ used and do 3.4 to 3.6 ghz on stock volts (11kh/s). When the 8 cores come out in a week, they should demolish the 2600k in price/performance for tenebrix

Also don't be aware cpu overvolting can sometimes double the amount of power used, i wouldn't bother using overvolted processors because you will lose a lot from your power bill.

If you're on amd64 linux, might wanna try my mangled scrypt cpuminer: https://github.com/ArtForz/cpuminer
compiled with CFLAGS=-O3
3.28 kh/s/core on a 3.6GHz PhenomII
2.73 kh/s/core on a 3GHz AthlonII
2.40 kh/s/core on a 2.7GHz Sempron 140

I will compile tenebrix on linux and try that right now, thanks

edit: There is a bug possibly

Quote

./configure: line 4888: syntax error near unexpected token `,'
./configure: line 4888: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.10.1, ,'

You can easily get around it by commenting these lines out though, since pretty much everyone with linux is running curl already

That's about a +0.85 KH/s boost per core, so now I'm getting 16kh/s on my 1055T

ArtForz

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 257

Quote from: tacotime on October 04, 2011, 07:17:00 PM

1.80kh/s per core, 1055t and 940be at 3.8ghz
1055ts are the cpu to buy to mine tenebrix, they are 120$ used and do 3.4 to 3.6 ghz on stock volts (11kh/s). When the 8 cores come out in a week, they should demolish the 2600k in price/performance for tenebrix

Also don't be aware cpu overvolting can sometimes double the amount of power used, i wouldn't bother using overvolted processors because you will lose a lot from your power bill.

If you're on amd64 linux, might wanna try my mangled scrypt cpuminer: https://github.com/ArtForz/cpuminer
compiled with CFLAGS=-O3
3.28 kh/s/core on a 3.6GHz PhenomII
2.73 kh/s/core on a 3GHz AthlonII
2.40 kh/s/core on a 2.7GHz Sempron 140

Bobnova

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Six threads running at 1.66kh/s here. 2600k. Other two threads driving GG production.

tacotime

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1005

1.80kh/s per core, 1055t and 940be at 3.8ghz
1055ts are the cpu to buy to mine tenebrix, they are 120$ used and do 3.4 to 3.6 ghz on stock volts (11kh/s). When the 8 cores come out in a week, they should demolish the 2600k in price/performance for tenebrix

Also don't be aware cpu overvolting can sometimes double the amount of power used, i wouldn't bother using overvolted processors because you will lose a lot from your power bill.

bulanula

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: grod on October 03, 2011, 01:19:04 AM

2x i7 920 at 2.8 ghz - 2.1 x 4 = 16.8 khash/sec. Averaging about 10 blocks every 24 hours so far. Not bad -- that's about the same as 2x5830s mining bitcoin. I'll probably shut down once the 30 or so bitcoins at .0014 are claimed though, definitely not worth doing at .0001.

So you are the one unloading TBX as soon as they are mined all day long keeping the price down ?

Good idea but remember the protecshun fund of 7.7 million won't be able to cash out if we also cash out

grod

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

2x i7 920 at 2.8 ghz - 2.1 x 4 = 16.8 khash/sec. Averaging about 10 blocks every 24 hours so far. Not bad -- that's about the same as 2x5830s mining bitcoin. I'll probably shut down once the 30 or so bitcoins at .0014 are claimed though, definitely not worth doing at .0001.

Winnopeg

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

What I've got access to:

AMD Phenom II X4 955 OC'd to 4GHz, Windows 7 64bit: 1.95 khash/s, three threads (one core left for cgminer) = 5.85 khash/s
Intel Core 2 Duo (T5750) at 2.0GHz, Windows Vista 64bit: 0.43 khash/s, two threads = 0.86 khash/s
Intel Atom N270 at 1.6GHz, Ubuntu 11.04 with minderd.exe running through WINE: 0.41 khash/s, one thread = 0.41 khash/s

With the proper minerd for linux the Atom only seems to get 0.18 khash/s. Not sure if it's a calculation error or what, but the Atom does seem to be able to do 1/2 the work the C2D does.

Topic: What speed are your getting CPU mining TENEBRIX? - page 5. (Read 13645 times)