Good afternoon. I would like to hear your opinion. I've been reading the forum sufficiently long, but I rarely write. I had one question. Why is the forum divided into 2 teams that angry with one another? The first support bitcoin and hate all altcoins. All of this for them is only garbage. Others like altcoins and do not understand what the problem have first.
I have a question for the first camp. Why?
Take for example Zilliqa, Tomocoin, NEO, DragonChain, etc. People who bought them in large quantities became richer. Why do you think this is garbage?
Bitcoin is a legend, but some altcoins are worth paying attention to, aren't they?
I belong to a camp that believes that altcoyins are very useful and deserve to survive, no matter how many of them there were. Indeed, a lot is created by carrying out unnecessary tokens ICO, mostly because they earn on the ICO itself and therefore their teams are not interested in and do not support their generated tokens. Also many ICO projects are just fraudulent. However, even the few useful tokens that are created from the introduction of promising and necessary projects in general deserve such an activity to continue. Unnecessary tokens vseravno later withdraw from the market and do no harm to anyone. The crypto-currency market filters them quite well.
The main problem of ICO projects is possible fraud on the part of their team. Such a problem will exist until state bodies or public organizations control their transparency and protect the rights of investors. Attempts to create a regulatory framework for this have already been undertaken in France, Russia, Japan, Australia. Therefore, the solution of this basic issue in the activities of the ICO should soon move from its place.