In a 8 deck shoe of Baccarat the house edge on a banker bet is 1.06%. Therefore, if you bet $1.00 for 10,000 games, the game balance should be around -1.06%*$10000 = -$100.60
Depending on what deposit and bonus offer you receive, the final balance will be different from casino to casino.
So lets suppose a casino offered you a 200% bonus with a 12x rollover. You will have to look in the fine print but for example BITOOMBA Casino says Baccarat hands equal only .25% of the rollover so we will have to multiply the 12x rollover by 4 to satisfy such bonus. If you deposit $100, just by playing Baccarat alone and only wagering $1.00 per spin you would have to play banker 14400 times to meet such rollover. Lets plug the numbers into the calculation and this is what you should end up around -1.06%*$14400 = -$152.64.
Initial Deposit + $200 Bonus - $152.64 = +47.36
If this is the case the player has a real edge and is unsuitable for a casino to offer long term especially with bitcoins which anyone could actually create 100 accounts and take such bonus offers. One thing is certain, Most RNG casino software is designed to take advantage of players and without the really dumb providers exposing themselves (casino web scripts for example and also the same software Bit777 shilled for) it sadly goes undetected.
Tell me, did you work with cws and inspected their software? Did you certify their software to say it is unfair? I don't see in your profile that you work for a gaming certification authority.
So far both of you are just kids hiding behind your monitor and saying so much crap because you lack having a real life. Did you know that any software and games can be certified by a gaming authority?
But that is the job of the casino owner, not the developer's job, to certify a software.
The way cws sells their stuff gives a lot of flexibility to the buyer, allowing him to certify his games, modify them, etc. So what happens after they sell the software has nothing to do with cws. If the casino owner wants a certification, then he should go get it and put a stop to all the bad whispers.
The only thing I agree with you is that every online casino should have some sort of certification from a 3rd party. All those provably fair solutions that you guys praise to the skies 24/7, don't really say that the algorithms are not rigged to give a certain order for the cards or that the odds cannot be influenced. All that provably fair stuff happens on the casino's server, so unless someone verified the games and stated that nothing like that ever happens, provably fair doesn't exist. See this:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1frm4x/So for now stop talking so much trash about certification, provably fair and fairness, because the number of certified bitcoin casinos is less than 5% of the total bitcoin casinos and if you want to give names, then casinowebscripts is definitely not the first one to start with.
I worked with cws in the past, back in 2010 when I had a licensed casino in Philippines. They were very kind to me, so I don't like your tone here.
As for aksplace ... don't believe a word this guy says. If you however want to believe all the stories that this guy makes up, then take a few minutes and read this:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoincasinopro-corrupted-and-unethical-behavior-more-evidence-310568On-Topic: "Casino Nick", there are many provably fair casinos, but provably fair doesn't mean 100% fair. For me, fair means 100%. What is not 100% fair, is not fair at all. Just read the reddit post I gave. This basically reduces your selection amount to just a few names or maybe to 0.