I decided that it was better to know where not to apply so as not to be in a party with spammers.
Obviously this has nothing to do with your failure to be selected as a Campaign participant, you cannot call it a group because spam is carried out by individuals. I think it's very simple, if you don't want to be part of the spammers, improve the quality of your posts.
Topic: Which campaign has the most spammers? - page 3. (Read 1184 times)
Giving up is not the solution, you need to pin it in your mind that failure is part of life, not all your efforts produce what you expect. There is a process that you must go through to correct all deficiencies that prevent you from being selected as one of the Campaign participants. The Campaign manager has his own criteria for selecting participants, of course he will first review your posting activity.
Stake.
But in my opinion, if you're participating in a same campaign where there are a lot spammers, you're not exactly same like the spammer.
As you can see yahoo62278 wear Stake signature (regardless it's a regular campaign or invitation), I doubt if people will say he's a spammer and left him a neutral feedback.
I decided that it was better to know where not to apply so as not to be in a party with spammers.
If it's your personal reason, I can't do anything.But in my opinion, if you're participating in a same campaign where there are a lot spammers, you're not exactly same like the spammer.
As you can see yahoo62278 wear Stake signature (regardless it's a regular campaign or invitation), I doubt if people will say he's a spammer and left him a neutral feedback.
Stake without any doubt. WO is not any kind of campaign and you know that. No reason to add it to the pool. Even WO has a rule that reporting posts in the WO thread won't work. But if you talk about which campaign participants generate spam in the forum, undoubtedly it's the stake signature campaign.
They hire participants without requiring any earned merits, without checking the post quality, and even without checking the feedback on their profile. The only thing they care about is posts in the gambling section. Their participants even write 20+ posts in 24 hours.
They hire participants without requiring any earned merits, without checking the post quality, and even without checking the feedback on their profile. The only thing they care about is posts in the gambling section. Their participants even write 20+ posts in 24 hours.
I tried to apply to one campaign, but my attempts were unsuccessful.
I'm sorry to be blunt, but judging by your post history and your reputation, I wouldn't hire you either. To be clear, I'm not talking about your main account. I don't know who you really are. Maybe you are actually a good, quality member. We might even have a good interaction with each other. But not with this account. This one seems more like a useless shit-stirring throwaway account.
Such topics may increase rivalry among forum members, as the signature campaign with the largest number of spammers means that all its participants are bad and that the campaign manager is lazy.
Merit system was invented to be a solution to the spam problem. Therefore, if you are not accepted into a signature campaign while you follow all the campaign rules, this does not mean that there is a problem with your account. Perhaps there are better members than you, or the campaign manager sees that you are publishing in sections far from the goal of the campaign.
Make sure you read the campaign rules, and if the campaign manager does not prohibit PMing him, you can ask him in private.
Merit system was invented to be a solution to the spam problem. Therefore, if you are not accepted into a signature campaign while you follow all the campaign rules, this does not mean that there is a problem with your account. Perhaps there are better members than you, or the campaign manager sees that you are publishing in sections far from the goal of the campaign.
Make sure you read the campaign rules, and if the campaign manager does not prohibit PMing him, you can ask him in private.
The post smacks of resentment more than a desire to learn about good company. OP, the main thing for you is not to do what you consider spam. I think managers are not blind to seeing such a high-quality poster and certainly invite him to their company.
I'm sure you know of cases where a manager personally invited users. Perhaps we should all think only of ourselves.
Good luck.
I'm sure you know of cases where a manager personally invited users. Perhaps we should all think only of ourselves.
Good luck.
Campaign managers have their assessment of the quality of posts that they will count or not count. If the quality of the post does not meet the standards of the campaign manager, it will not be counted. some managers exclude some boards that don't count. as well as the quality of participants' posts.
several other members have shown how many managers select new participants. maybe you can get better if you start to adapt. although each manager has their methods and standards.
Maybe the tags on your account can also be taken into consideration by the campaign manager when they want to see how you really are.
several other members have shown how many managers select new participants. maybe you can get better if you start to adapt. although each manager has their methods and standards.
Maybe the tags on your account can also be taken into consideration by the campaign manager when they want to see how you really are.
Although, you're a full member of the forum but you haven't been active in this forum for a long time and that's the main reason why no manager accepts you into a campaign that they manage. If you really want to be in a campaign then first be active on this forum and make posts on daily basis, I know somedays you might not be able to make posts but those days can be avoided, try to make posts at least 5-6 days in a week.
I don't think that it makes sense to ask a question that which champaign has most spammers blah blah blah, you don't really need to know that, while some members you might consider as spammers might be some good members who might be making good posts for that campaign. It's not the way to go, if you really want to get accepted then improve your posting habits and be a good member of the forum.
I don't think that it makes sense to ask a question that which champaign has most spammers blah blah blah, you don't really need to know that, while some members you might consider as spammers might be some good members who might be making good posts for that campaign. It's not the way to go, if you really want to get accepted then improve your posting habits and be a good member of the forum.
Why does it matter honestly? What other posters do or don't do has nothing to do with you. If you get accepted, you worry about you and you'll be fine. In order to be accepted you do have to be an active user of the forum. Managers aren't going to accept anyone who isn't posting at least a few times a week for the last 3-4 months and also who haven't earned any merits.
You have earned 18 merits since October of last year and have 20 posts since October of last year. Most managers will pass right over you for now.
You have earned 18 merits since October of last year and have 20 posts since October of last year. Most managers will pass right over you for now.
Find from there
Active users, top posters and most active topics in the past 1h, 24h and 7d
https://loyce.club/active/7d.html
I don't judge they spam or not but most of posters in the list is from Stake campaign.
Active users, top posters and most active topics in the past 1h, 24h and 7d
https://loyce.club/active/7d.html
I don't judge they spam or not but most of posters in the list is from Stake campaign.
I find it hard to honestly believe that the OP doesn't know which campaigns have the most spammers. It's clear to me that it's someone's alt account, and seeing the things he knows about reputation it doesn't quite make sense that he doesn't know what he's asking.
Another thing I find surprising is that he has started posting in the gambling section when he had never done it before, to the point that I wonder if the account has changed hands, but without more data we can not know for sure.
Another thing I find surprising is that he has started posting in the gambling section when he had never done it before, to the point that I wonder if the account has changed hands, but without more data we can not know for sure.
I tried to apply to one campaign, but my attempts were unsuccessful.
The two neutral feedbacks you have on your profile show that you don't have much respect for other members, and you have some very bad manners. I don't know if that has any influence on the managers, but it certainly doesn't help.
you missed two cheap campaigns that are probably the closest to the title of most spammers at the moment.
I tried to apply to one campaign, but my attempts were unsuccessful.
Your attempt was unsuccessful, probably due to your weak activity on the forum. From glancing at your activity, it seems you only started posting more regularly in the past few days. The managers tend to choose members who show long-term, meaningful involvement in the community discussions. With just a short burst at the end, they dont have enough history to judge whether you will be a quality addition.
He just started actively posting again because previously he got a red tag from royse777, after the red tag was changed to neutral he started posting again (of course for the campaign)
I decided that it was better to know where not to apply so as not to be in a party with spammers.
You can register to this campaign, I see not many spammers join this campaign, even though this campaign is very good
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoincleanupcom-charity-signatureavatarsocial-media-campaign-members-5415550 by NotATether
I tried to apply to one campaign, but my attempts were unsuccessful.
Your attempt was unsuccessful, probably due to your weak activity on the forum. From glancing at your activity, it seems you only started posting more regularly in the past few days. The managers tend to choose members who show long-term, meaningful involvement in the community discussions. With just a short burst at the end, they dont have enough history to judge whether you will be a quality addition.
I decided that it was better to know where not to apply so as not to be in a party with spammers.
This has nothing to do with your first statement. And I dont think such a generalization is fair. Spamming is individual. If you dont want to be part with the spammers, just dont spam!
The title of the thread fully describes the essence of the issue.
I tried to apply to one campaign, but my attempts were unsuccessful. I decided that it was better to know where not to apply so as not to be in a party with spammers.
I tried to apply to one campaign, but my attempts were unsuccessful. I decided that it was better to know where not to apply so as not to be in a party with spammers.
Jump to: