Pages:
Author

Topic: Which one has a Ethereum-like potential? - page 2. (Read 1526 times)

hero member
Activity: 2912
Merit: 526
Reward: 10M Shen (Approx. 5000 BNB) Bounty
August 04, 2022, 03:45:06 PM
Hello,
Which one of the following coins has a Ethereum-like potential:
1- Terra
2- Avalanche
3- Polygon
4- Moonriver
Thank you.
Easy Polygon for me
Polygon is an easy way to go if you want to trade either short or long term. Especially when more Polygon are widely used on new projects as their tokens and the chance of Polygon will going better is significantly higher if that's possible. It's just a matter of time Polygon will not be overshadowed with the other "Ethereum-like" coins.

All of the projects you have on your list are better than Ethereum but ETH is now more reliable than all new smart contract projects,
That's why OP said "Ethereum-like" ?? we are not talking about ETH here.
member
Activity: 279
Merit: 10
I don't think any of these coins have the potential to rival ethereum. ethereum is one of the kings of this market. And I think these coins you have mentioned need more time to become like ethereum or they will never be. It's not easy to rival ethereum. For example: LUNA
hero member
Activity: 2828
Merit: 611
Polygon is better because transaction fees are cheap, and now Polygon is also building an NFT network so that market players can be creative with their passion for making NFT
surfing this whole post? i can only see Matic being pushed by majority but also most of them are Bounty hunters , there are few prominent account mentioning Polygon as their bet for altcoin as Ethereum potential coin.

Maybe let us stop there and let Ethereum be On its own and those mentioned coin have theirs also?
I am not saying that polygon is bad or anything, but most of the online people you see that promote it would eventually one way or another have a connection to it. The weird part about crypto is that if you ask people what they think would go up, they will tell you either who they work for, or what they are holding.

There are rarely anyone who never made a dime out of a project, plus do not even hold any of it, and still end up supporting or shilling it. The main idea is that, why would they? which is reasonable, I can understand why someone would shill something they wouldn't own, just go buy some if it looks like it is a good thing. But that doesn't mean that you shouldn't do that for things that you are about to buy or wish to buy.
full member
Activity: 548
Merit: 168
Play Bitcoin PVP Prediction Game
I think Luna is more better than Avax and very High potential like Terra Luna because they have their own Stable coin UST which is backed by Luna and most of Etherium Whales also holding UST which show that the future of Luna is bright. They are also constantly buying BTC in every Dip and I think thelis project can go big in Future.
now it also backed by Bitcoin that in few days ago continuesly done by their CEO. Luna has great potential to grwoth more than current condition , although alot fud coming regarding their stablecoin.no one will thinking only in less 2 years its price growth to more 100$ when i know it still around 0,5$.


Ethereum is still a pioneer in terms of smart contract platforms, and it will be very difficult to replace Ethereum,
look at Binance, even though Binance also makes a smart contract platform which they named Binance smart chain,
it is still very difficult to beat Ethereum, GAS Fee is cheaper,
but ecosystem Ethereum is much more because Ethereum has been around for a long time compared to BSC.
but Binance still has a big chance, why not choose for it?
maybe hathor could be the next ethereum competitors, with several main features especially on security and feeless transaction. if nano contract fully released and adopted , i am believe its ecosystem will growth alot .if compare with other smart contract plaform, maybe hathor be safest platform because its mined just like bitcoin.
full member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 100
C O M B O
Ethereum is still a pioneer in terms of smart contract platforms, and it will be very difficult to replace Ethereum,
look at Binance, even though Binance also makes a smart contract platform which they named Binance smart chain,
it is still very difficult to beat Ethereum, GAS Fee is cheaper,
but ecosystem Ethereum is much more because Ethereum has been around for a long time compared to BSC.
but Binance still has a big chance, why not choose for it?
sr. member
Activity: 811
Merit: 250
it's true that ETH is still undefeated and not even one of the selected coins can beat ETH any time soon.
However, if we look at the ones that have the most potential to be like Ethereum in the future, I think Luna and Polygon have a very big opportunity to be able to compete with ETH in the future because developments that are being carried out now continue to run on a positive trend and are able to slowly attract the crypto market.
Luna and Polygon are still very far away from having to compete with the others in order to get close to ETH because now ETH is still the strongest altcoin that no other altcoin has yet been able to compete with, especially if it is a new altcoin that still needs further development.
full member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 182
“FRX: Ferocious Alpha”
Polygon is better because transaction fees are cheap, and now Polygon is also building an NFT network so that market players can be creative with their passion for making NFT
surfing this whole post? i can only see Matic being pushed by majority but also most of them are Bounty hunters , there are few prominent account mentioning Polygon as their bet for altcoin as Ethereum potential coin.

Maybe let us stop there and let Ethereum be On its own and those mentioned coin have theirs also?

You know, for me the postponement of the ManuFactory release was kind of a test of its community. Like, even after that thousands of people are still following this project, so now I am 100% confident in the success of my investment.
What? op is asking about given 5 currency to be somewhat like Ethereum , but you are talking about nothing specific?
Polygon is better because transaction fees are cheap, and now Polygon is also building an NFT network so that market players can be creative with their passion for making NFT
and also one of the most promising currency the market ever has now.
hero member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 550
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Polygon is better because transaction fees are cheap, and now Polygon is also building an NFT network so that market players can be creative with their passion for making NFT
Yes, and for potential coins it actually has to be seen from all sides as well as Avax and Terra which have also been very good at developing so that the demand for them will also increase in the future, and may also expand to NFT one day.
full member
Activity: 644
Merit: 106
Polygon is better because transaction fees are cheap, and now Polygon is also building an NFT network so that market players can be creative with their passion for making NFT
sr. member
Activity: 1046
Merit: 273
I think out of everything here, Avalanche probably has the most potential.

The Terra ecosystem is very interesting but I don't think that it's going to go anywhere in the long term, there are simply way better alternatives out there that are up and coming.

Polygon is a good short term scaling solution for ETH but at the end of the day the Layer 1 ETH network has to be scaled itself for Ethereum to succeed, so as soon as ETH2.0 rolls around I think that MATIC will take a big hit.
I think Luna is more better than Avax and very High potential like Terra Luna because they have their own Stable coin UST which is backed by Luna and most of Etherium Whales also holding UST which show that the future of Luna is bright. They are also constantly buying BTC in every Dip and I think thelis project can go big in Future.
I am not so sure about it, Luna is definitely something that is getting a lot more interest these days and I like the fact that the popularity keep climbing up even during a bad market period. However, I have to say that it is not going to be something that is sustainable if they keep this up, it is going to be a bit of a trouble for sure.

I just think that we are going to get something that would be a bit more on the risky side if they force their way into some high place. Avax is not like that, it actually does have a community that catapulted them here, unlike Luna which does have a community but at the size they should be at this level.
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 575
it's true that ETH is still undefeated and not even one of the selected coins can beat ETH any time soon.
However, if we look at the ones that have the most potential to be like Ethereum in the future, I think Luna and Polygon have a very big opportunity to be able to compete with ETH in the future because developments that are being carried out now continue to run on a positive trend and are able to slowly attract the crypto market.

Polygon certainly does have an edge over others because it managed to fill a need that people had. Its basically ETH but cheaper version right now where people do use ETH but use it on their network instead. Look at opensea, there are so many projects that use polygon these days. Its all matic here and matic there, the network is getting incredible attention. I do not believe that it could go on forever, I do not see it being amazing 10 years later, I believe ETH will fix this gas fee issue and thats when this will stop being good. This is the only reason why I do not invest into polygon and still keep it in ETH instead.
sr. member
Activity: 811
Merit: 250
I think Luna, Avax, Cosmos are bringing competition and functional development like Ethereum.  Trends and demand responses in crypto change very quickly for the development of strong capital flows from first-advisory trust.  But I think ETH will still deserve to be the king of altcoins for many more years when ETH 2.0 becomes the main strength.
ETH is still unbeatable by other altcoins even though ETH 2.0 is still a long way to go for a lot of people to see because until now there are still a lot of people willing to trade with ETH even though it's also not bad to have to choose Luna, Avax, and Cosmos because they too compete well in the crypto space.
full member
Activity: 812
Merit: 108
Hello,
Which one of the following coins has a Ethereum-like potential:

1- Terra
2- Avalanche
3- Polygon
4- Moonriver


Thank you.
I think Luna, Avax, Cosmos are bringing competition and functional development like Ethereum.  Trends and demand responses in crypto change very quickly for the development of strong capital flows from first-advisory trust.  But I think ETH will still deserve to be the king of altcoins for many more years when ETH 2.0 becomes the main strength.
Choose "Polygon"
I like it too.  But Polygon is a layer 2. I don't think it will surpass the market share of layer 1 wars as a reflection of organic origins.
sr. member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 339
I think Luna is more better than Avax and very High potential like Terra Luna because they have their own Stable coin UST which is backed by Luna and most of Etherium Whales also holding UST which show that the future of Luna is bright. They are also constantly buying BTC in every Dip and I think thelis project can go big in Future.
What you say may be true, but Avax is also not in a bad condition so anyone who has more capital will also not be wrong if they want to buy Avax even though they are still inferior when compared to Luna because Luna already has advantages as you said.
Luna is currently under development which is better than Avax but these two coins are very competitive in volume which can be seen on the CMC list.
but for the future, no one knows what will happen, everything is still possible, and I personally have more or believe in the better Avax coin in the future.
however, if it has the potential to be like Ethereum, I think the two are still very far away, there are still many other coins that have more potential than Luna and Avax.
hero member
Activity: 2478
Merit: 512
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I think Luna is more better than Avax and very High potential like Terra Luna because they have their own Stable coin UST which is backed by Luna and most of Etherium Whales also holding UST which show that the future of Luna is bright. They are also constantly buying BTC in every Dip and I think thelis project can go big in Future.
What you say may be true, but Avax is also not in a bad condition so anyone who has more capital will also not be wrong if they want to buy Avax even though they are still inferior when compared to Luna because Luna already has advantages as you said.
full member
Activity: 826
Merit: 135
Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big
I think out of everything here, Avalanche probably has the most potential.

The Terra ecosystem is very interesting but I don't think that it's going to go anywhere in the long term, there are simply way better alternatives out there that are up and coming.

Polygon is a good short term scaling solution for ETH but at the end of the day the Layer 1 ETH network has to be scaled itself for Ethereum to succeed, so as soon as ETH2.0 rolls around I think that MATIC will take a big hit.
I think Luna is more better than Avax and very High potential like Terra Luna because they have their own Stable coin UST which is backed by Luna and most of Etherium Whales also holding UST which show that the future of Luna is bright. They are also constantly buying BTC in every Dip and I think thelis project can go big in Future.
hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 722
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
Their only problem is that they do not have enough promotion. This is something I really despise because back in the day cryptocurrencies did not do marketing, they just existed and people invested into them, today that has changed.

It means that projects need to do marketing in order to grow bigger, and that means centralization because there needs to be "someone" that pays that marketing which is usually the creators of the project. This is why I feel like this is usually not a great future for crypto. However, that is the reality for the time being, I have to say that without proper marketing that would mean that the price would probably not grow as much as the coins that does proper marketing.

Exactly. So many projects aim to compete against Ethereum, yet they lack enough marketing to make them rise from the ground up. Not only that, but most of the alternative projects you see aren't that focused on decentralization as much as Ethereum. For this and many other reasons, I don't think Ethereum will lose its position in the market anytime soon. We could say that the project closest to Ethereum in terms of decentralization is Cardano (ADA). But it still lacks a solid ecosystem of dApps, tokens, and services around it. Without much developers on the platform, how do you think it will succeed in the long run?

At least, the competition is healthy. As long as projects work together to make crypto/Blockchain land a better place, nothing else matters. Just my opinion Smiley
In short, its really that hard to beat up a project which is the first on something or shall we say being the father and just like ETH which is the main erc20 based project which lots of projects had made use of the platform or its blockchain which had been flooded out the market.

So beating or kicking it into its place as second ranking on the overall market is somethat that is really hard.Pointing out on which one or coins is ETH like then this is really hard
so far we arent seeing any projects which is capable or having that potential to be like ETH in the future.
legendary
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1363
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
Their only problem is that they do not have enough promotion. This is something I really despise because back in the day cryptocurrencies did not do marketing, they just existed and people invested into them, today that has changed.

It means that projects need to do marketing in order to grow bigger, and that means centralization because there needs to be "someone" that pays that marketing which is usually the creators of the project. This is why I feel like this is usually not a great future for crypto. However, that is the reality for the time being, I have to say that without proper marketing that would mean that the price would probably not grow as much as the coins that does proper marketing.

Exactly. So many projects aim to compete against Ethereum, yet they lack enough marketing to make them rise from the ground up. Not only that, but most of the alternative projects you see aren't that focused on decentralization as much as Ethereum. For this and many other reasons, I don't think Ethereum will lose its position in the market anytime soon. We could say that the project closest to Ethereum in terms of decentralization is Cardano (ADA). But it still lacks a solid ecosystem of dApps, tokens, and services around it. Without much developers on the platform, how do you think it will succeed in the long run?

At least, the competition is healthy. As long as projects work together to make crypto/Blockchain land a better place, nothing else matters. Just my opinion Smiley
jr. member
Activity: 73
Merit: 1
Polygon should turn into the best pick after land even this is second layer answer for Ethereum however it has a similar potential. I believe polygons have an incredible chance to have the option to continue in the strides of Ethereum, despite the fact that polygons actually need time and cycles to grow further.
sr. member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 250
Hello,
Which one of the following coins has a Ethereum-like potential:

1- Terra
2- Avalanche
3- Polygon
4- Moonriver


Thank you.

These 4 coins will not be compared with ETH, but all of them are really very potential and worth holding. If I had to choose 1 out of 4 coins I would choose terra, currently terra ranks 8th but I believe it will soon enter the top 5 on CMC. Terra's growth this year reminds me of last year's solana breakout. But with UST, luna will grow even stronger. To mint 1 UST, it is necessary to burn the corresponding amount of LUNA worth 1 dollar this will create a scarcity of Luna in the market.
in terms of price, indeed the four coins cannot be compared with Ethereum, because the price of Ethereum is very expensive, more than $2000,
and these four coins are only at the lower level, but when compared to technology, all four can have potential,
but I prefer choose Polygon, and don't forget Binance Smart Chain has potential too.
Pages:
Jump to: