Oh God, if we want to invest in IEO we have to wait for a response from the community. Of course it's a strange thing, what's the use of ourselves if we still believe in other people's words. If for example the project fails and you experience a loss, whether the community can be responsible.
Each investor is responsible for his actions himself. but if the project could not fulfill its promises and raise the necessary amount of money or could not realize its model, then the responsibility lies on the project and they must compensate money for investors
Topic: which one is better for you guys ? - page 4. (Read 1208 times)
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
I think that is depend what IEO they offer.
But i prefer choose doing IEO on the top exchange, maybe the response is slow because there is bunch ticket from people. We know not small fee to enter IEO, there is also can riskier on exchanges side.
I always avoid that shit exchanges, i believe they can give you some problem if still on that shit exchange.
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
If IEO is top notch then why public response is flat? One of the biggest reason why any exchange gets enthusiastic community is due to its unshady-trustful operation. I don't think there exist any exchange which has shit service but good support from community except HitBTC.
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
Obviously a project that will succeed will do so because it has what it takes so it can also do well in any exchange whether shit or not. I think the project matters a lot and that is important first before exchange.
Credibility exchange is the most important for any IEO. Just look at the Tecra Coin project, it looked very good and I was very excited for them, but Tecra coin did not raise enough money, because they chose Latoken for their IEO.
I will not choose both, IEO on a reliable exchange does not mean it will succeed and IEO on an unreliable exchange is also very unlikely to succeed.
I just ignored both 2 IEOs and waited for a good IEO on the reliable exchange.
Just your kind information large and reputed exchanges will be never launch shady projects. Specially all of the Binance launchpad projects was big successful and most of the investors unable to participate on IEO. Top exchanges IEO's must be successful because more competition to invest here likes Huobi,Bittrex,OkEx and KuCoin exchanges already launched a lot of reliable projects. Shit exchanges launchpad projects are most of the failed. So that i will go with first option. I just ignored both 2 IEOs and waited for a good IEO on the reliable exchange.
Doing IEO on the top market is better for us and you as big investor than you have joined with IEO list with shit exchange market, never take risk your money with investing with IEO listed on shit exchange market because almost of IEO listed with shit market have lower price, you have joined with IEO give your big chance for profit and stop joining IEO listed whit shit exchange market because its looks not good price after active trading there.
IEO is like ico's wherein it all depends how good the project is not the exchange and etc ,because it's not their fault to be honest , indeed there work is to advertise it only and if theirs an errors the dev should be blamed no other than. . Unfortunately investors assuming good development on it and all relying on some good exchange because of being so popular , reason they suddenly flip to negativity after experiencing a bad situation and sometimes they blame the owner of the exchange. Lol
Popularity is sure part of it, but I don’t think that their response to a coin is typically because of the popularity of the exchange alone, there are so many popular exchanges that we have too but people would still be skeptical about joining their IEO, do you know how popular that Yobit is, Yobit is a very popular exchange that there is virtually no one that does not know that exchange, but anytime they release IEO, people are always very careful in reacting to it.When Binance opens an IEO, people rushes to take it like there is no tomorrow, I think that it is very important to note that the reason why people actually do rush binance IEO is not just based on popularity, but because of their integrity, they believe that Binance values its name so much not to come up with any project that will tarnish their image.
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
IEO is the top market, because in my opinion all transactions and progress are real, all achievement volumes are real. because the top market has a big responsibility to be transparent. different from the shit market. because of a lot of manipulation, fake achievement to attract people to buy IEO. no transaction transparency. and more bots. 
Oh God, if we want to invest in IEO we have to wait for a response from the community. Of course it's a strange thing, what's the use of ourselves if we still believe in other people's words. If for example the project fails and you experience a loss, whether the community can be responsible.
It's better to avoid IEO. it's clear that IEO is just a fundraising scheme and their main intention is to deceive investors. and we must be smarter and not easy to be fooled. we certainly don't want our money to only get junk tokens. so it's better to stop investing in IEO. And I recommend buying your Bitcoin for 3 years 
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
Speaking of IEO, most investors tend to consider the exchange where the crowdfunding will take place. I guess, the project it self comes 2nd priority or it could be either way depending on the investor. But most likely, an IEO has better chance of getting much attentio when it is conducted in a famous exchange with big market volume and users. I think it is rare that an IEO would have a flat public response if it is in a top exchange, not unless investors had made a good review or are aware that a project has no potential.
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
Weird, top public response on top exchange should be very good because most IEO were sold out publicly there. what do you mean flat ?
I believe investing in IEO on popular exchanges will be better than non credible exchange, because you won't have liquidity problem when the coin being traded after the IEO end.
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
I prefer the first choice. IEO was heavily exchanged, but public response was flat. maybe for the beginning, this is a little less good. but when the trade is opened, you will be able to see the difference between large exchanges and small exchanges. Large exchanges can increase trading volume, this is one thing small exchanges cannot do. hype won't help when tokens/coins have started to trade, just look at many projects that were initially popular during IEO, but in the end the price is dumped because it doesn't have trading volume.
Oh God, if we want to invest in IEO we have to wait for a response from the community. Of course it's a strange thing, what's the use of ourselves if we still believe in other people's words. If for example the project fails and you experience a loss, whether the community can be responsible.
Each investor is responsible for his actions himself. but if the project could not fulfill its promises and raise the necessary amount of money or could not realize its model, then the responsibility lies on the project and they must compensate money for investors 
Oh God, if we want to invest in IEO we have to wait for a response from the community. Of course it's a strange thing, what's the use of ourselves if we still believe in other people's words. If for example the project fails and you experience a loss, whether the community can be responsible.
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
Can you describe more about the 'flat' response ? I prefer to joining IEO on top exchanges than on shit exchanges.
You cannot trust your money to some not good exchanges, because we don't want to risk our money too high.
These thoughts are only in writing, real life is very different. Even though shitcoin is sold at Binance, it will not take more than an hour but, sales in scam exchange may be possible depending on the project. However, there is a little possibility in this because good projects usually value investors.
I go for the second. So far cryptocurrency is all about to attract as many as investors and traders. If a crypto project with much potentiality fails to attract investors and traders, it may go to a waste. But a project without much potentiality will have a good future if it is supported by many investors and traders.
Better doing IEO on great exchange with you make IEO on shit exchange, impossible listing with shit exchange your IEO get many respond from investor and public, how come they will trust with bad exchange and your IEO be lower price because lower investor want to invest with shit exchange, you can buy with great exchange your IEO coin.
investor will be very selective while they want to join in IEO.profit rate on exchanges IEO history will be main factors for their decision.only big exchanges such as binance, huobi, gate io or maybe okex that recommended for us if we want to participate in IEO.now days IEO hype decrease alot, and investors get less profits than previous IEO.
Better doing IEO on great exchange with you make IEO on shit exchange, impossible listing with shit exchange your IEO get many respond from investor and public, how come they will trust with bad exchange and your IEO be lower price because lower investor want to invest with shit exchange, you can buy with great exchange your IEO coin.
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
Better to choose the reliable top exchanges because they have many users to join the IEO.
The top exchanges will keep their reputation good by listing only good quality IEOs on their exchange.
Otherwise, they can lose their users because listing bad project.
If you have the chance and money to invest, it's still good to place your money where most are also investing in.
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
It is good to consider all possibilities before choosing which IEO to join. Since not all IEOs can be trusted, it is preferable to choose IEOs hosted by the tier 1 exchanges like Binance, Kucoin, Bitrue etc. These exchanges have high level of credibility and due to their reputation, these exchanges run checks on the projects by collecting proof of doc in order to ascertain the authenticity of the project before hosting their IEO on the platform. Jump to: