Topic: which one is better for you guys ? - page 8. (Read 1234 times)
a shit coin will always be a shit coin or token even if it was launch on big exchange , and vice verser to the low exchange as well but marketing and team in most cases could drive a project high for more customer or investors but folloing the lay dwn rules and road map is another thing that require from the team and if that fail in between then the project ends there .
The project is what matters the most, especially at present in which it is so hard to find decent projects...
of course that a good exchange will bring credibility and hype... and of course the potential of a high number of users participating.... but in the end it is just that... any exchange will do if the project is really good, just the probability of good results is higher on a good exchange...
of course that a good exchange will bring credibility and hype... and of course the potential of a high number of users participating.... but in the end it is just that... any exchange will do if the project is really good, just the probability of good results is higher on a good exchange...
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
An IEO remains to be all about the project and the exchange is just adding more credibility to the project and that opportunity that the project is exposed to a wider audience (the audience captured already by the exchange). No matter how good is the exchange if the project is not then there is nothing the exchange can do except maybe to reject the project in the first place as there is also a strict vetting process that good exchanges are implementing. Yes, it is also possible that a good project can be doing well even in a not-so-good exchange and this is what I would prefer. Still, we have to understand that good projects are always looking at the top exchanges for more chances of success, of course.
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
I think you should compose a much better question such as if youre gonna pick an IEO exchange for somw project is it worth to buy on major one such as Binance or a mid range one such as exmarkets? To be honest the question is kinda confusing. Sometime topic like this is common sense and more of newbie question type.
Yes, you are right, choosing an IEO in exchange like Binance is always the right choice but sometimes it is impossible to get the tokens because there is huge competition in Binance exchange. I will not choose the Exmarket IEO's because after concluding the IEO, sometimes the coins are not listed in EXmarket exchanges.
I would choose an IEO that will have a fair chance of giving us a good return, in this case, I am going to go with the less known exchange.
Who wants to participate on shit exchanges and there's no certainty that users funds are safe and that the IEO will be successful? I better go on big, well known and trusted exchanges like Binance because it's all about short term profit.
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
I prefer to do IEO on the top exchange than the exchange, which is not credible. I am sure the response from the trader will be good for the new token that will be listed on those exchanges. You can have a big chance to see the token will reach its success in that exchange because the top exchange will have huge traders that will have interest with your project.
I don't think that in the exchange which is not credible will have a public who are enthusiastic because all in all, the exchange still not credible and we cannot expecting to reach goals in that exchange. I think you need to ask in the top exchange about how much they use the fee to do IEO in their site so you can calculate how much money you will need to spend.
Make sure you follow the rule on the top exchange because in every exchange will have a different rule.
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
I think you should compose a much better question such as if youre gonna pick an IEO exchange for somw project is it worth to buy on major one such as Binance or a mid range one such as exmarkets? To be honest the question is kinda confusing. Sometime topic like this is common sense and more of newbie question type.
I have never invested in IEO or some kind of IEO listed on a large exchange, but I see many people who get short profits if investing in large IEO (Binance) if I'm not mistaken like the Harmony project they get a good ATH.
The top exchange IEO projects are good. They have a huge potential to get quick profit with it. But we hard to participate top exchange IEOs right now. Because of lotteries. The loattaries need to hodl their exchange coins to participate in IEOs. That's why. I personally don't like to recommend exchanges with low volumes. The exchange is not the only thing to participate in IEOs. If you are going to invest long term, you have to check about future updates, development team, marketing and many more.
I think the IEO project will be more organized than the ICO, how not every investor at least has the peace of money they spend. But I see that IEO has an exchange (responsible) where at least the money spent by each investor can be managed or stored properly. I have a belief in exchanges, especially exchanges that already have credibility in cryptocurrency, they will always prioritize a reputation which will not be hasty when taking a project. As has been done by Bittrex recently.
People currently only care about IEO at large exchanges, so if IEO is implemented at shitexchange then that IEO will fail, just like ICO
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
The Exchange has successful IEO they will choose the project very carefully. So, I think you only need to search on google for a minute and you will find the IEO statistics on the exchanges. With the data, I think it is not difficult to choose to join IEO on any exchange. 
Of course everyone will love IEO in large exchanges because they are sure the public will know which projects are good so enter the big market IEO, but if IEO in small exchanges people will be silent and participate in promoting it.
I personally prefer an IEO running on a large exchange that has a high volume because there are many wealthy traders who are likely to invest in this promising project. In my opinion, the public response does not matter at the first stage while the team raises funds to develop their product or service. Perhaps the community will see the benefits from using purchased coins or tokens in the future. I think that IEO which was run on a credible cryptocurrency exchange looks more respectable.
I did not choose both, because I prefer big exchanges that have high HYPE, or maybe big exchangers and the project is very active and also has high enthusiasm,
I use money, so I am very careful when taking IEO.
I use money, so I am very careful when taking IEO.
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
I would prefer the public response is flat but we have seen that most of the IEOS that were done on top exchanges were of a success. Even the project is sort of unfamiliar, crappy and unpopular as long as it's held on a popular exchange, they get a successful sale. The next choice is what happens today, there were exchanges that are not popular too and the public becomes too optimistic about it because we have not seen the finished product until everything changes after the sale.
An active community does not connote a successful project or that it does not make the project successful. However, it is very much needed. If it is done on a big or healthy exchange, the exchange already has its community. Which means that it will add to the already existing number.
No matter how huge and supportive community is, lunching an IEO of good exchange is very essential.
No matter how huge and supportive community is, lunching an IEO of good exchange is very essential.
Both are pretty crappy and I'd likely avoid investing in either option, though I'd rather invest in an IEO that has any sort of chance of being successful even if it's launching on a crappy exchange that's loaded with issues or has poor/slow support. On the other hand, there's also plenty of bad or unoriginal IEOs that launch on good exchanges that don't ever make it anywhere for various reasons such as just simply having a bad product. I suppose I'd rather invest in the better IEO in the end.
Doing IEO on the top exchange but public response is flat, or IEO on the exchange is not credible or shit exchange but the public is enthusiastic about welcoming it ?
Obviously a project that will succeed will do so because it has what it takes so it can also do well in any exchange whether shit or not. I think the project matters a lot and that is important first before exchange.
For me big exchange has big volume and even if IEO gets a little demand but it still has a lot of chance to be traded with high volume after that.
Jump to: