Topic: which project you are more likely to invest in (Read 488 times)

Yes, when the product starts to be used a lot, and there are lots of positive responses, that's a good sign. Projects with good progress like that increase investor confidence. I would also prefer a real project like that.

The mindful investors have ability to sort out the bad projects among the dozen of the IEOs/ICOs. Mass adoption will not happen overnight, it takes time but when the crowd starts to use the products of these porjects the market value will touch the maximum points again.

The suggested features of the blockchain technology will correct the world economy and the economy will reward the deserved industries one day. The provided information is limited and choosing the good source is essential in order to make a best bet in the crypto world.

Big BANG with low offer INITIAL SUPPLY: 1,000,000
and even better is a 25% burning rate on each pass #deflationarytoken #Big BANG #cryptocurrency
be part of this project that came to bring in profits and many
earnings for all investors, follows all information from the
project below let's grow together #Big BANG #cryptocurrenc

  EXTREME DEFLATION TRANSACTION BURN: 25%

Offical Website: https://bigbangtoken.com
https://t.me/TheBigBangToken
https://twitter.com/TheBigB06405285/status/1164297665389170688

I prefer number two. Projects that are useful, work products, and seem to progress are more promising. It is a commitment that must be shown by the developer as a form of responsibility and seriousness in achieving its goals. By choosing a project like this, we can reduce the risk of getting caught in a scam.

I invest in projects with specific layout plans and roadmap which usually plans to address a particular gap seen in either the financial ecosystem or a specific problem or challenge seen in the world in general.  Projects that present products that address the mass adaptation of cryptocurrencies are the kinda thing i will surely invest in.

@OP, I have seen your project and I know where you are coming from. You truly have a good idea, but I feel you easily do that, without organizing any form of fundraising. Also, with such service you are rendering, there are ways in which you can get more money to keep developing the platform and that you yourself can honourably earn more.

the project with the most ambitious plans I find is NULS. They're supporting their own crowdfunding system as well as being one of the few projects ability to be interoperatable with other chains

I've just recently learned about NULS and feel pretty excited on all of the announcements they've made such as their SCO. T

Yes i am,
Benefits:
-We offer 30% discount for our services if you pay with our token
-We are releasing and we plan release many new features and services where our token will be mandatory
-20% of received tokens from our users(in payment for services) will be burn, each month.
-In about 2-3 weeks we will release new types of arbitrage scanners in our tool(triangular and futures) and access to them will be available only after payment in tokens.
-In about 2 months we want release totally new system of arbitrage platform where you will be able to deposit funds in our wallet for example 1 BTC and you will be able to use this 1 BTC on all supported exchanges, usually if we support 25 exchanges you would need 25 BTC for this. Thanks to this system our users will be able to do much more trades. User will be trading through our platform, with our funds, it is not possible to withdraw them, he can only make selected trade, he can only make a transaction up to the amount of the deposit, his deposit will be a collateral. If he finishes the transaction successfully, earnings will be added to his wallet, if at a loss it will be taken from his deposit. This system will open new opportunities for two kind of people: traders(just described) and investors who will deposit/borrow funds in exchange for share in trades profits and fees that traders pay for borrowing funds.
-Soon after we will release those described thing we want to release our news agregator with AI as a separate service but connected with our arbitool, arbitool will be importing some data from it. This service will require ArbiTool tokens to pay for alerts and notifications.

So yes we are this no2 option we slowly develop our tool from 1,5 year from our own funds without spending money on marketing. No big promises, just hard work and real products that work and you can test them, try them, buy them! and we listed our token on Altilly Exchange.   

I invest in projects with working product because with good product, the demand of the coin keeps coming and this is one of the imperative factors required for the survival of a coin. Also, I'm always on the look out for the expertise level of the team in cryptocurrency and marketing as this will determine how well the coin and project will reach the mass around the globe.

Of course, I will choose the second option. I generally don’t like ambitious projects with a lot of hype around them. Such projects, as a rule, always fail.
However, I am used to evaluating the project myself and this criterion is not the most important. First of all, the usefulness of the project and its prospects are important, what tasks it solves for itself and what conveniences it will bring to people.

number two is good, because if a team use their own funds to developing the project,,
thats really big sign if the team member is really serious with their project

Kinda feels like you are just advertising the thread. Anyways, obviously its going to be the option number two. Why would someone want to invest on a project that is all talk with no progress? That would be plain stupidity. But, yeah, sadly there are people who fall for their marketing crap and ends up investing on those shit project.
The second option is better since you get to see them slowly developing instead of ideally sitting and blabbering. At least you know that a product is being released eventually.

The second option of course. If you take a clear look, projects like that do well once they seek for funds because investors already knows what they are getting involved with. I have seen few of them, and they are still developing their products and services.
But the first option, once Public sale ends, comes with series of excuses and before hand they will die off.

Obviously this is just all about PR marketing and there will be no progress with this kind of project. However, how can you determine that they will never release any product and all they do is to be vocal about their idea?
I removed the example as its obvious the sentiment will go with this description for such kind of project.

I am inclined to invest in this project:https://noia.network/?utm_source=icodrops.You can buy their token here:https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/noia-network/#markets.They have a small capitalization,but a very ambitious idea and team.If You have any questions about the project,You can ask them in the official telegram group:https://t.me/NoiaNetwork.These are the projects I love. Damn they are developing according to the roadmap. That is very rarely seen.But of course better than this project,the signature of which I wear,no.https://auditchain.com

lol, the second option seems a little skeptical of late buddy. recently I've seen that projects that claim they have their own funds start sugarcoated payments (especially if they're the dividend paying types) and then later things worsens. Nevertheless, projects tht steadily grow are better options.

I would definitely agree with this. You know if this project would be a game changer every thing is possible. Isn't it that binance was new I mean theyre a lot of exchanges when they came in but yet theyre the top right now so what they did? They did it differently and delivered results and keep on improving. Unlike the others.

investing in number 1 will have the hype after the project release and there will be a project if the team is real!
investing in number 2 will have the hype at the selling stage of tokens and it will depend on the new exchanges and development in a long run.

Well both are good it depends on the matter that you will have study.

P.S another kind of hype like this thread! way of promotion!

I also choose number two.  It is better to slowly but confidently step up and achieve your goal.  It seems to me that the main quality of the project and not speed.