Pages:
Author

Topic: which project you are more likely to invest in - page 2. (Read 488 times)

member
Activity: 744
Merit: 10
Syntrum.com
projects that did not do ICO were successful, maybe because the team members had many good partners to collaborate on so the project was successful and I tried to find projects that were almost identical and found souls, some projects that had real products were a good step to have the altcoin we want to hold for the long term
jr. member
Activity: 176
Merit: 1
At number one the project is very interesting because the marketing position to the maximum but accompanied by ambitious, ambitious this is what will end up not good

Therefore I will choose number two because the project runs slowly but surely, slowly by evaluating every time, looking at market opportunities. That way the project will be achieved.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
Actually the two choices are quite interesting to me, but it seems the second choice is the best choice to be a reference for me to investment in the future, because usually the influence of a product is enough to give a very positive effect for investors, so the slightest development of the product the will certainly affect the movement of token or altcoin prices in the market later
jr. member
Activity: 224
Merit: 2
I prefer number two. because I prefer to slowly progress but with definite results. not to pursue something ambitious but merely talk without proof. and I always follow the same program as number two. indeed the process of running the program took longer but the result they achieved was certainly not just a false promise.
hero member
Activity: 3024
Merit: 651
I will pick number 2 but not your example.

One example is PundiX and GCOX (ACM).
PundiX already have a unit but they are still lacking in numbers. It is still a working progress but have been producing a lot of changes for 2 years I think.
It is slow just like how you identified number 2 option.
GCOX though is high risk. Although most investors are popular faces there is still a risk that it may go sideways or maybe for a long time before it will be fruitful.
member
Activity: 840
Merit: 17
PG-PAY Gold Backed Token
I personally don't invest in any of the new projects. Trust is the main issue here. Project teams are exploiting the small investors to big investors by one or other way. Better safe than sorry is my opinion. Golden days are gone. Projects like Aeron, Credits, came up and gave good profits to investors.
full member
Activity: 798
Merit: 104
Just wondering in which project you are more likely to invest in.

1. project with very ambitious plans and very strong marketing.  however, with the great risk that he will never release any product and all this is empty promises.

2. a project that was slowly developing from its own funds, released a working product and just started selling it and after 1,5year on the market released tokens to raise funds for creating more products and make strong marketing. For example this one: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-arbitool-professional-arbitrage-scanner-we-will-show-you-where-buy-low-4327261


Investing in a good project with a real product and developer inside like ethereum, eos and bnb, but right now I put some money in some existing project that come from IEO like matic and one because I believe this project have a bright future.
sr. member
Activity: 811
Merit: 250
Good project, are you part of the project team ...? and what benefits are given to us if you participate in the project ..?
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 104
I prefer to invest in existing coins which already have a low price from it ATH (all time high). But there is also a lot of good coins from new projects like bitwings, miracle tele, mb8 coin and so on.
copper member
Activity: 336
Merit: 3
Cryptoknowmics - World's First Decentralized Media
The combination of both of them would be great, but we need to stay realistic Cheesy. In my opinion a good project should have a strong marketing plan and a working product, before the launch of their token sale to show investors that the project has value and not just a whitepaper.
sr. member
Activity: 1680
Merit: 259
In my opinion, the two are not good, the first is too ambitious, the second takes too long to handle, the project must be mature and the team is ready in everything because many people invest there and many expect the project to run normally.
hero member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 772
Projects that slowly develop from their own funds and have a high commitment in the success of the plans that have been prepared. I think the project will be safer for investment, as you mentioned in point number 2.
member
Activity: 854
Merit: 10
To be honest, I chose the second option, because this would have a good impact on all investor. of course this will be very beneficial through a strong foundation of a project.
full member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 147
Looking at the market of new project currently I prefer to choose short term investment. I don't think the new peoject will success for long term and will give you a high profit, yeah I cay say it is high risk.

I just pick up an IEO who launched by binance exchange and wait it, so I'll sell all of them when has traded on the exchange exactly when I got profit. Long term investment is very suitable when we choose bitcoin as the place. There are many fundamental factor who can make you comfortable when you store your money on it.
full member
Activity: 644
Merit: 103
Invest in gambling platform is my favourite, i was invest on some gambling websites, now i invest on Decentralized gambling platform, the return is not so high but its okey for long run, because house always win for long run
member
Activity: 266
Merit: 18
Another exchange? Smiley most of them have big problems with trading volume. I don’t think there is space for next one


But if the new exchange is to create a difference in quality and good customer support, it will quickly dominate the crypto market. Don't worry about your life after other exchanges, focus on technology and quality of customer service and you'll succeed.
hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 816
🐺Spinarium.com🐺 - iGaming casino
I don't like with the number one because the project has very ambitious plans, but I am okay with the very strong marketing.

I prefer the number two because it seems, the project runs steadily step by step and consistent with what they do to reach their goals. But to invest in that project, we need more than that because to select the right project will not as simple like that. The situations have changed and not the same as the last year, so we need to be very careful to decide.
full member
Activity: 434
Merit: 100
Every project comes with their risks. As for me I will prefer to invest in a project with real use case and also with tons of partnerships with major players in both crypto and outside crypto fields.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1207
There is a project called OAX. At first they were planning to create first DEX exchange. At the time they had bounty, I was cheering for them from my heart. But this year they are not following their roadmap, it turned to be that they are "not creating dex exchange", not there have lots of competitors (wasted time, now they wont be first on the market).
full member
Activity: 980
Merit: 109
Of course, I will invest in the project at number 2. The presence of a working product, interest in the product of the target audience - these are very important facts for successful development.
Pages:
Jump to: