Topic: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? - page 107. (Read 142898 times)

Thank you. I think every forum member should be accused of being Satoshi Nakamoto at least once in their lives. Thanks for being my first, Sato- ....er Hertzmeister.

  I apologize I didn't immediately recognize you, Sir Nakamoto! Good masquerade!

Don't you roll your eyes at me, young man!

 

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09964.html

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.558986

Satoshi is legion XD

but seriously, he's probably a member of the bitcoin foundation.

He also spoke in parables. You should read the Bitcoin whitepaper sometime.

don't think so. He predicted specialized hardware (ASICs). That means he predicted greed.

Has anyone considered the possibility that proudhon might be Satoshi trolling around just for laughs? 

Satoshi is someone who is sad his invention is now being used by greedy mofo's trying to get rich off the next greedy mofo's instead of real trade

that's why he left in 2010 anyway, read his last comments

https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=163



This is why whoever Satoshi really is can never out himself.

Yeah, just some guy on the internet, ya know?

He's just this guy, you know?

So is this Satoshi a person? Or a group? Or has this been determined yet.

I have come to understand a lot more about BitCoin, and it's reason for being; however, has the 'who is the creator' actually been answered?

I see references to groups, individuals, even the range of the founder of MTGox through Max Keiser. Is this still a mystery? Or has there be a resolution?

If it has not been answered, perhaps a look at the language itself; I am trying to determine if perhaps it's more, possibly.

When I look at Satoshi Nakamoto, and I have seen in an above post that this maybe a jumble of corporate names, but:

Could it be that Satoshi, was meant to be: Shatoshi?  In which case (Sha) (to) (shi) would translate to: "I am with the database"; and Nakamoto 'could' be seen to translate as, when the characters are seperated to individual kana: (na)=do (ka)=you (mo)=as well (to)=and.

In which case "SHA"toshi Nakamoto could be interpreted to say: "I am with the database (Network/system/source.. etc)" "and you should be to; or -And you should be aswell"; which would entirely support the philosophy of use and useage and community and trust.

This little unit now declared/known as the "satoshi" or the "shatoshi" would then as well be part of the "I am with the database", no? As a Unit?

Just a thought? Any others?

There's a guess that the former owner of MtGox could be him ...

http://www.bitquestion.com/question/1/satoshi-nakamoto

Read the top answer. sounds credible to me (mtgox in japan, satoshi's japan fascination, ex-owner of gox also created donkey client which is a p2p thing) - many good reasons behind the guess

I did.

also this is just to mention that I managed to step up my "ignore score" to 19...30 people!

I must be onto sth.!

anyone notice that Keiser looks a bit japanese?

surely not Hank fucking Paulson

Actually, I hear that it might be Robert Paulson.

If not Max... then it has to be, Roger Waters !

LONG LIVE Mr. Nakamoto, Mr. Waters, Mr. Keiser.

pEACe