There will be alternatives but it will not happen that fast. It will be very costly too. There will be a lot of discussions to environmentalists and various stakeholders. There's geopolitical issues too that need resolutions like Algerian gas going Europe but most likely needs to pass thru Morocco.
The fact that Germany will be spending billions of dollars to fast-track their LNG terminals means it needs to be utilized for many years to come to cover its cost. I wonder what will be the future of Russia once Europe becomes free from its gas. More wars? Maybe more Russian aggression in order to salvage favorable economic deals? And NATO can freely move against Russia too.
1. China. This is the most energy-deficient country in the world, China made its impressive economic breakthrough on cheap coal, the reserves of which are now severely depleted. China needs a lot of energy, much more than Germany, and Russia has a surplus. In January 2022, an agreement was reached on the construction of the Power of Siberia 2 gas pipeline for 50 billion cubic meters per year (like Nord Stream 2). Also, LNG terminals have been actively built in the Far East for several years, with a focus on the Southeast Asian market. The Power of Siberia gas pipeline with a capacity of 38 billion cubic meters per year has been in operation since 2019.
2. Domestic market. For many years, Gazprom has been export-oriented, often to the detriment of domestic consumers. Russia is a huge country with a harsh climate and there is still great potential for gasification of private households. Recently, one of the branches of Nord Stream 2 was reoriented from Europe to gasification of the North-West of Russia (Karelia, etc).
Do not worry about Russia, it is much easier to deal with excess energy than with energy shortages. Europe's withdrawal from Russian gas would be a disaster for Russia in 2014, but not in 2022 - Russia has done a lot to diversify during this time. But what Europe has been doing all this time is not entirely clear to me.
1. The power of Siberia. In reality, the project can perform in comedy shows
I won't tell you what the statements were and what the reality is, right?
Before the problems of 2021-2022, until Russia started having problems with gas supplies (and as you know, Russia has nowhere to store gas that is not redeemed), it began to look for ways to dispose of it. Otherwise, just either burn or conserve the deposits. This is where Siberia's potency came in handy. Why impotence - well, let's tell us what is the content of the declared 50 billion cubic meters, for which the contract was supposedly signed, but I won't say anything for now
So, since Siberian impotence was essentially idle (no, no, some kind of gas was pumped through it, not 100% simple, but also far from the volumes under the "100% signed contract"), there was nowhere to put gas, a way out was quickly found - "fraternal China helped." I agreed to buy a certain amount of gas at the price of the market minus 30%
That's all the deflated power of Siberia. Now, of course, the loading will go - it’s necessary to sell gas at a dumping price, which the EU refuses! But the payback period of the project flies to infinity
2. Of course, to the detriment of the domestic market, this has always been the case. I remember that in Krasnodar, my aunt lived almost in the very center of the city. Red Street. In 1982-1990, I personally remember how they suffered with bottled gas. Either it is not there, then it barely burns (diluted wildly). And I know that before she moved to a new apartment (about 2000+), there were problems with gas ... This is practice. And it's not deep...
Well, if almost half of the populated territories do not know what normal gasification is! Do you really want to say that now they will drop everything and pull pipelines through depressive, degrading regions?! I'm ready to be patient and watch this new "Santa Barbara", but I'm afraid that this will be the longest and really endless series