Pages:
Author

Topic: Who will win WW3? - page 4. (Read 66680 times)

member
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
November 13, 2017, 11:47:52 PM
According to Niall Ferguson in his work: The World War. A future 3rd world war is no longer profitable and profitable. Before, nations were fighting for territorial and economic conquests. However, before, the economic system was based on territorial and national precepts. Everything was very physical and direct. The commercial was summarized in close territorial transactions. Today, we have a totally independent financial system, interconnected, monitored cybernetically. All nations are dependent on this system, and it is in their interests to maintain their preservation. For today, those who seek to function far from this logic will suffer a harsh punishment of the productive and financial system. In short, a war today will only bring damage to both parties, both winners and losers, all lost.
full member
Activity: 560
Merit: 105
November 13, 2017, 11:37:19 PM
I think WW3 will be won by some little islands in the middle of the Pacifi Ocean which will be spared from the nuclear holocoust. And perhaps by the penguins living in the south of Patagonia.
The whole earth will not be able to survive when the next world war happens, I am sure that a lot of Africans countries are not going to join sides but it will not be helpful when nuclear weaponry is used because the fallout will be global.
WW3 will not happen , if that happen the whole world will be in chaos. Many people will die because of nuclear reactions , die in bombings , many innocents people will suffer including the young ones. Nuclear warfare will be the main caused of WW3.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
November 13, 2017, 11:12:01 PM
I think WW3 will be won by some little islands in the middle of the Pacifi Ocean which will be spared from the nuclear holocoust. And perhaps by the penguins living in the south of Patagonia.
The whole earth will not be able to survive when the next world war happens, I am sure that a lot of Africans countries are not going to join sides but it will not be helpful when nuclear weaponry is used because the fallout will be global.

Most of the African nations are being ruled by dictators (Sudan, Zimbabwe.etc). And these dictators will side with whomever offering the biggest paycheck. Although they are not technologically advanced, the African nations (such as Nigeria) possess a lot of manpower, which can be used as cannon fodder during the world war 3.
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 259
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
November 13, 2017, 08:05:38 PM
I think WW3 will be won by some little islands in the middle of the Pacifi Ocean which will be spared from the nuclear holocoust. And perhaps by the penguins living in the south of Patagonia.
The whole earth will not be able to survive when the next world war happens, I am sure that a lot of Africans countries are not going to join sides but it will not be helpful when nuclear weaponry is used because the fallout will be global.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 15
November 13, 2017, 07:50:43 PM
full member
Activity: 387
Merit: 106
November 13, 2017, 03:52:34 PM
I think WW3 will be won by some little islands in the middle of the Pacifi Ocean which will be spared from the nuclear holocoust. And perhaps by the penguins living in the south of Patagonia.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
November 13, 2017, 03:55:49 AM
No one can win that war  but many innocent will die. We are the inbocent who will die if that ww111 will burst. Let's pray for peace and love.
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
November 13, 2017, 03:35:17 AM
I think no faction will win World War III if it happens.  Almost 80% human population may die in it.  Actually, some countries not involved in World War III may emerge as new Superpowers.
full member
Activity: 390
Merit: 157
November 13, 2017, 01:54:08 AM
For me is , no one will win , nobody win. War is like a gamble , no winner , as a human though we're like brothers and sisters . What are we fighting for , to rule the world? , have powers and so all. Pride , ego and powers , they make boundaries to our world , My mom said to me that ourself is our own enemy. So please make peace and love not war.

And back to the topic , nobody will win , were just wasting our resources , by building weaponry , ammo or bullets , we're just wasting our time , we're just gonna kill ourselves , mostly the innocence.

Make peace and love not war.
member
Activity: 154
Merit: 10
November 12, 2017, 05:59:06 AM
Tough to say but it would pretty much be the majority of Europe, USA, Canada, Australia, South Korea, India, Saudi Arabia, Turkey Vs Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, plus a few ex soviet nations. Japan, Brazil and other big nations might not join. Overall, the USA and the allies will probably take control of most of North America, South America, Europe, Africa but the Russians and their allies will control the majority of Asia. And if Nuclear Weapons war not used then the war could possible last decades and no clear winner might be seen at this moment but I think the USA and the allies would eventually come out on top due to the NATO alliance.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
August 14, 2017, 04:43:04 AM
I think Nato would crush Russia

Yeah... in your dreams. During the past 6-7 years, Russia has managed to design some of the best defence equipment in the world, while the defense technology in the United States has lagged behind. A few examples include the Armata tank, S-400 air defense systems, Onyx cruise missile, and the Sukhoi PAK FA fighter jet.

I would have to agree with you. Russia has been beefing up and doing it without much noise. Putin is a cheeky bastard who knows what he's doing. Hell he's even rigged the last election to his advantage. Though in case of an all out war, without the us holding back, i think all of us will feel the negative effects wherever we are.

If you look at the technological progress achieved by both the armies during the past 10 years, then it can be seen that it was Russia which made the maximum advance. But during the same time, the defense sector in the US has stagnated.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
August 14, 2017, 03:06:43 AM
If russia and china merges together against NATO they would still be defeated...
Russia and China may be powerful nation, but history tells us that most wars are won by numbers...
NATO has a lot of powerful members that could easily join together and crush both russia and china for once...
Russia and china will only win if they can find more ally powerful nations...
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 529
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
August 05, 2017, 09:25:16 AM
I think Nato would crush Russia

Yeah... in your dreams. During the past 6-7 years, Russia has managed to design some of the best defence equipment in the world, while the defense technology in the United States has lagged behind. A few examples include the Armata tank, S-400 air defense systems, Onyx cruise missile, and the Sukhoi PAK FA fighter jet.

I would have to agree with you. Russia has been beefing up and doing it without much noise. Putin is a cheeky bastard who knows what he's doing. Hell he's even rigged the last election to his advantage. Though in case of an all out war, without the us holding back, i think all of us will feel the negative effects wherever we are.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
August 05, 2017, 03:12:12 AM
I think Nato would crush Russia

Yeah... in your dreams. During the past 6-7 years, Russia has managed to design some of the best defence equipment in the world, while the defense technology in the United States has lagged behind. A few examples include the Armata tank, S-400 air defense systems, Onyx cruise missile, and the Sukhoi PAK FA fighter jet.
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
August 04, 2017, 01:48:31 PM
I think Nato would crush Russia - the USA doesn't have the # of enemies Russia does. I mean surely a lot of people hate America but not that many countries/leaders hate America. They're too entrenched economically for countries to hate on em! And look at the sanctions the USA is putting on Russia. These are crippling their economy while Russia is barely retaliating with sanctions of their own because they know they would only hurt themselves if they did.
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
August 04, 2017, 01:40:29 PM
I think USA still holds the upper hand since we do not have any real land connected enemies whereas Russia has all of Europe and much of Asia connected directly to it. Canada and Mexico aren't fighting the U.S. for many many many more years even with all this silly Mexican border wall talk from Presidente Trumpo.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 500
August 04, 2017, 01:10:11 PM
no one will win
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 255
Live cams shows pimped with cryptocurrency
August 04, 2017, 06:32:14 AM
During the second world war, little Germany, has created problems for many countries. Such a monster as the USSR would not survive the confrontation with Germany if not for the help of England and America. Now the Russians are trying not to think about it.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
August 04, 2017, 06:23:47 AM
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
August 04, 2017, 05:50:57 AM
I think the best solutions for human race is avoiding WW3,but for small conutry best way is to stay neutral such as Spain or Sweden in WW2,but if planet go to war i think the best chance for victory have Russia,China or India,this country have hugh manpower 4,5 bilions,more resurse oil gold and one historical adventage for Russia is her winter  Shocked
Pages:
Jump to: