I've grown quite fond of settling small everyday stuff (like when someone picked something up for me (or the other way around)) in bitcoin. Bitcoin already works for me in that regard and it's really useful. I don't see why this use case alone wouldn't be able to make bitcoin big at all, it just takes time. Just today I had 2 "bitcoin newbies" (they actually had fully synced bitcoin clients on their laptops with 0 transactions) buy bitcoins from me. So the userbase is growing and these dudes didn't even seem to me like they needed the stuff for silkroad. Neither were they hardcore libertarians or anti-establishment in any way, they just genuinely thought bitcoin was a cool idea and maybe they should get some.
Slowly moving towards critical mass without any hot-shot corporation pulling a humongeous biggie seems to be a viable path to me. Protecting ourselves well along the way against the various attacks and problems that will undoubtedly occur we should be fine in the end.
I'm still silently hoping for some kind of a big kaboom, but it's not necessary in my mind.
Falkvinges assumption of it taking 10 years from inception to widespread use might turn out to be correct.
Why do you insist on having to interface with that shoddy payment system credit cards resemble? The people behind that are our competition.
Why do you insist on having to interface with that shoddy debt-based fiat currency? The people behind that are our competition.
I don't wanna be a tool for the Dollar!
Bitcoin is real money, not the Dollar.
I'm not talking about "defying and ignoring the real economy", I'm talking about that economy using real money.
Do you design and build model trains too? If you think bitcoin is some "neat" idea to be used by casual hobbyists for selling three and a half coins to some bitcoin bohemian you met online and then met in person, then you have little appreciation of the ambition of Satoshi Nakamoto's bitcoin project. What
possible value did bitcoin provide you in "settling small everyday stuff" that couldn't have been accomplished with dollar cash? What percent of the world do you think has vaguely any interest whatsoever in participating in the economy in this "bitcoin enthusiast" fashion?
"Our competition"? Bitcoin is not competition to the fiat-based credit card point of sale systems. There are maybe a half a dozen token transactions daily that actually deal in bitcoins, in person, and most of these occur at some bitcoin enthusiast meet-up. All bitcoin transactions occur online. The simple fact is that the cost of learning about bitcoin, dealing with fluctuations, installing an android app, and
grappling with the fact that no customers know what the hell they are , far outweighs the pittance saved in credit card company fees. If you believe bitcoin can be spread this way, then I encourage you to also go convince your family to uproot to new hampshire to participate in that far-fetched libertarian venture, and then to go canvass for obscure 3rd party candidates! This view is best expressed in what is perhaps the most commonly expressed and yet false sentiment I've ever heard: "Every little bit counts".
It's all well and good to be a bitcoin cheerleader, but let's be serious here. The world is far too big and bitcoin far too complex for mere word of mouth to drive its adoption. Indeed, the only reason the network is the most powerful distributed network on earth is because there's a huge profit incentive. People need something valuable to respond to, and making tiny token transactions on smartphone for a beer is a value to bitcoin enthusiasts,
not to the masses . The bitcoin community needs to stop worrying about these irrelevant interests, and start focusing on engaging with the world economy as a
currency of currencies, and THEN as a currency proper.