Author

Topic: Why do Atheists Hate Religion? - page 436. (Read 901367 times)

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
May 16, 2015, 11:14:27 AM

If He doesn't have any super powers, then maybe you could turn to your wife for help.

The word "God" by definition suggests super powers. Perhaps you should turn to your wife for help.

Smiley

EDIT: If you are a woman, seek help from your husband?

I'm a woman and not married. I will turn to my mother as I see God in her as well.

God is the creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority. For me this is the definition but I don't believe he has super powers because I haven't seen them nor do I believe in miracles.

I do believe that this earth also is a form of God, rain is a form of God, and the food I eat also is a form of God. I live on this earth, I get water from the rain, I am alive because of the food I eat. They keep me alive and for me, even my books are a form of God as I gain knowledge from them. God doesn't have a face or shape but he is in my heart.

Call my crazy or anything but I believe in God and not his super powers or magical powers.

No disrespect meant but, I haven't seen anyone who has the ability to create anything that is materially real. People create artistry, but they do not create the materials of the paints or canvas whereon they express their art. Such creation of the material of the universe is a great miracle.

Smiley
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
May 16, 2015, 11:13:20 AM

If He doesn't have any super powers, then maybe you could turn to your wife for help.

The word "God" by definition suggests super powers. Perhaps you should turn to your wife for help.

Smiley

EDIT: If you are a woman, seek help from your husband?

I'm a woman and not married. I will turn to my mother as I see God in her as well.

God is the creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority. For me this is the definition but I don't believe he has super powers because I haven't seen them nor do I believe in miracles.

I do believe that this earth also is a form of God, rain is a form of God, and the food I eat also is a form of God. I live on this earth, I get water from the rain, I am alive because of the food I eat. They keep me alive and for me, even my books are a form of God as I gain knowledge from them. God doesn't have a face or shape but he is in my heart.

Call my crazy or anything but I believe in God and not his super powers or magical powers.

I am not disproving you but bolded part suggests the god in your heart to have superpowers.

I liked this - "God doesn't have a face or shape but he is in my heart."
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
May 16, 2015, 11:07:18 AM

If He doesn't have any super powers, then maybe you could turn to your wife for help.

The word "God" by definition suggests super powers. Perhaps you should turn to your wife for help.

Smiley

EDIT: If you are a woman, seek help from your husband?

I'm a woman and not married. I will turn to my mother as I see God in her as well.

God is the creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority. For me this is the definition but I don't believe he has super powers because I haven't seen them nor do I believe in miracles.

I do believe that this earth also is a form of God, rain is a form of God, and the food I eat also is a form of God. I live on this earth, I get water from the rain, I am alive because of the food I eat. They keep me alive and for me, even my books are a form of God as I gain knowledge from them. God doesn't have a face or shape but he is in my heart.

Call my crazy or anything but I believe in God and not his super powers or magical powers.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
May 16, 2015, 10:56:52 AM
I believe in God and no matter if I am called anything, I will still believe in him. That's my belief and I will stand with it no matter what.

As long as you don't think your god has power over anything else, then I have no issue with you.  I call my god "consciousness" Smiley

It's people that believe their god has power over me that make me upset.

I don't believe that my God has any kind of super power but I consider him as a spirit who helps me when I feel low.  I don't believe in miracles  Smiley

If He doesn't have any super powers, then maybe you could turn to your wife for help.

The word "God" by definition suggests super powers. Perhaps you should turn to your wife for help.

Smiley

EDIT: If you are a woman, seek help from your husband?
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
May 16, 2015, 10:49:36 AM
I believe in God and no matter if I am called anything, I will still believe in him. That's my belief and I will stand with it no matter what.

As long as you don't think your god has power over anything else, then I have no issue with you.  I call my god "consciousness" Smiley

It's people that believe their god has power over me that make me upset.

I don't believe that my God has any kind of super power but I consider him as a spirit who helps me when I feel low.  I don't believe in miracles  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
May 16, 2015, 10:01:47 AM
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
May 16, 2015, 09:25:26 AM
Both atheists and theists attempt to push their beliefs on others at times. You can see how religion in schools in America is often not allowed a voice. Much of the time the religion of government is to let people - children in school - make up their own minds. This isn't what school is for. School is for training children rather than letting them make up their own mind.

Then it isn't a place of learning, it is a place of indoctrination.

A school is to educate children so they may be better able to make sense of the world around them, not to make-shit-up(tm) and tell them they must believe it.

So, on the basis you believe that children should be 'trained' rather than educated, does that also follow as them being raised?

It truly does take religion to make good people do bad things, but it also provides as a nice camouflage for nasty bastards to abuse their children, the vulnerable human beings whom they are entrusted to care for and nurture, but who choose, instead, to beat into submission, in the name of their gawd!

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-25268343
Quote
A child-raising book that advocates whipping with branches and belts has sold hundreds of thousands of copies to evangelical Christians. But the deaths of three children whose parents appear to have been influenced by the authors' teachings have provoked a growing backlash.

The implements can vary. For a child under one year old, a willowy branch or a 1ft (30cm) ruler is recommended. For older children, a larger branch or a belt.

But the objective of the "spanking" described in Michael and Debi Pearl's To Train Up a Child is the same - making children surrender completely to their parents' will.

"Training is the conditioning of the child's mind before the crisis arises; it is preparation for future, instant, unquestioning obedience," reads a passage from the book's first chapter.

The "training" is meant to start early and pre-empt the need for punishment. But if the child is already rebellious, parents are told to "use whatever force is necessary to bring him to bay".

"If you have to sit on him to spank him then do not hesitate. And hold him there until he is surrendered... Defeat him totally."
Hannah (not her real name) grew up in a community of Independent Fundamental Baptists in north-western Florida. Her parents obtained copies of books by the Pearls when she was about nine and her sister seven.

The spanking began shortly afterwards and continued for at least eight years. In the first five years, it usually happened several times daily.
One day, when she was 14 or 15, her father heard a story about Hannah getting into a fight with a boy at church.
"I'm still not sure honestly what I was being accused of, but my dad just completely flipped out because whatever he heard was just atrocious," she says.
He used wooden rulers, or yardsticks, to spank her, snapping about five in the course of the beating - her mother kept a dozen in the house because they broke so often.
"When I couldn't sit down a couple of days later he was like: 'Stop being so melodramatic, what's wrong with you?' Then he had mother look and [my coccyx] was incredibly bruised and swollen."
Hannah, now in her mid-20s, says her father was "horrified" and never spanked her again. But her mother continued, using a plastic blind handle that she thought was less likely to leave marks on her children's skin.

Like other people who have witnessed Michael Pearl's advice being put into practice, Hannah says her parents were seduced by the idea of a simple formula that would make their children compliant.

"The problem is that [Pearl] tells you you have to break your children," she says. "And to get there you have to be completely ruthless."
To Train Up a Child is widely seen as the most extreme of the publications produced by conservative Christians in the US who advocate corporal punishment.

It is produced by the Pearls' organisation, No Greater Joy Ministries, which is attached to the church where Michael Pearl is a pastor in Pleasantville, Tennessee. First published in 1994, the book soon became popular among fundamentalist, non-denominational groups outside mainstream Christian culture.

Within these tight-knit communities, many families educate their children at home, viewing schools as having a harmful social environment and being insufficiently religious. The Pearls started homeschooling their children in the 1970s, when the practice was still novel.
Homeschooling in the US

Elizabeth Esther, a blogger who grew up in a conservative Christian community in California and describes herself as a "recovering fundamentalist", says that in her church the Pearls were "basically held up as the sterling example of how to raise your children before God".
The group said its revenue for the 2012-2013 tax year was $1.5m, 60% of which came from sales. Some products are donated to prisoners and military families, and boxes of books have been sent to US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

To Train Up a Child has sold more than 800,000 copies, according to Michael Pearl. Sales have remained steady in recent years and are only boosted by attacks, he says. "We have several million very happy and cheerful parents and kids who've seen great, wonderful fruit from that book and other things we've written."

Extracts

For the under one year old, a little, ten- to twelve-inch long, willowy branch (striped of any knots that might break the skin) about one-eighth inch diameter is sufficient. Sometimes alternatives have to be sought. A one-foot ruler, or its equivalent in a paddle, is a sufficient alternative. For the larger child, a belt or larger tree branch is effective.
The parents who put off training until the child is old enough to discuss issues or receive explanations find their child a terror long before he understands the meaning of the word. A newborn soon needs training
PARENTS MUST ASSUME THAT PART OF THE CHILD'S MORAL DUTY WHICH IS NOT YET FULLY DEVELOPED. The parents' role is not that of a policeman, but more like that of the Holy Spirit
When the time comes to apply the rod, take a deep breath, relax, and pray, "Lord, make this a valuable learning session. Cleanse my child of ill-temper and rebellion. May I properly represent your cause in this matter."
Make it a point never to use your hand for spanking. The hand swatting is a release of the parent's own frustration. Furthermore, where the child is concerned, the hand is for loving, not martial arts.

Matthew (whose name has also been changed) grew up in a homeschooling family in the mid-West that expected just such positive outcomes from To Train Up a Child.
Spanking with wooden rods and branches started at a very early age for Matthew and his two younger siblings. In the first 10-12 years it happened daily to weekly, he says, before becoming less frequent but more severe.
He says there were no serious injuries. But there have been cases ending in tragedy.

Three child deaths

Hana Williams, 13, hypothermia, malnutrition (2011)
Lydia Schatz, 7, massive tissue damage (2010)
Sean Paddock, 4, suffocated in blankets (2006)
In 2010, Lydia Schatz died after being beaten, three years after arriving in California from Liberia. The following year, another adoptee, 13-year-old Hana Williams, died from hypothermia and malnutrition after being left in the back yard in a small town in Washington state.
The Schatz parents are serving long prison sentences after pleading guilty to charges including second-degree murder, torture, voluntary manslaughter and unlawful corporal punishment.
The Williams parents were sentenced in October to decades in prison for manslaughter.
Investigators said both sets of parents had followed advice from To Train Up a Child, a copy of which was reportedly found in both homes.
Michael Ramsey, a district attorney who prosecuted the Schatzes, said he was planning to mention the book as a contributing factor if the case had come to trial.
Though he did not want to detract from the parents' responsibility in causing Lydia's death, he said the book's ideas were "wholeheartedly embraced by the Schatzes", and "the entire philosophy of the book is intended to lead someone down that slope".
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
May 16, 2015, 08:51:59 AM
I believe in God and no matter if I am called anything, I will still believe in him. That's my belief and I will stand with it no matter what.

As long as you don't think your god has power over anything else, then I have no issue with you.  I call my god "consciousness" Smiley

It's people that believe their god has power over me that make me upset.

Now, why should that upset you? There really is only one reason. You are being controlled by the suggestions that others make about you. And if it isn't their suggestions - because you didn't say "suggestions," you only said belief - does that mean that you believe the things that other people believe control the way you exist? Sounds like a very strange religion to me. Other people better not have beliefs about you because if they do, those beliefs might actually control you somewhat.

Smiley
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
May 16, 2015, 08:26:34 AM
I believe in God and no matter if I am called anything, I will still believe in him. That's my belief and I will stand with it no matter what.

As long as you don't think your god has power over anything else, then I have no issue with you.  I call my god "consciousness" Smiley

It's people that believe their god has power over me that make me upset.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
May 16, 2015, 08:24:54 AM
Quote

He is a perfect example of why atheists don't get along with theists.  We understand everyone has their own belief, while they believe their belief is THE belief.  (understand?  lol)  They attempt to push their beliefs on us, while we believe everyone has the right to their own beliefs.  

@bold: This is don't by both sides usually and I don't agree with both of them. One doesn't believe in God, fine. One believes in God, also fine. There's nothing to insult/abuse the persons who do/do not believe in God and I find many doing that when it comes to any topic that involves religion. I find the topic of religion just useless as what is the excuse to quote a religion for any kind of event/crime? Those people who commit crimes are simply inhuman/bad people who don't have the right to talk about God as they believe in the opposite.

So many protestants started forcing their belief on me and I simply ignored them and then they began criticizing me because I don't believe what they believe in. It's just insanity.

I believe in God and no matter if I am called anything, I will still believe in him. That's my belief and I will stand with it no matter what.

Both atheists and theists attempt to push their beliefs on others at times. You can see how religion in schools in America is often not allowed a voice. Much of the time the religion of government is to let people - children in school - make up their own minds. This isn't what school is for. School is for training children rather than letting them make up their own mind.

In a discussion in an Internet forum, when does it become "They attempt to push their beliefs on us?" Usually this happens when one side or the other can't answer appropriately. The only thing that the side without answers can do is to answer by character assassinations of logical people in the other.

If you happen to hold a belief that you can't back up with examples or logic, and if someone else happens to show you examples and logic that oppose your beliefs, why do you get into character assassinations of the people who have the reason and the logic?

AND I AM NOT SPEAKING TO erikalui HERE.

It seems that some of the atheists in this forum aren't smart enough to formulate answers to show that atheism is not a religion. So, they attempt to abuse the characters of those who can make a logical point.

But isn't that often exactly the thing that people of a religion do when they can't win people over to their religion?

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
May 15, 2015, 07:27:17 AM
Quote

He is a perfect example of why atheists don't get along with theists.  We understand everyone has their own belief, while they believe their belief is THE belief.  (understand?  lol)  They attempt to push their beliefs on us, while we believe everyone has the right to their own beliefs.  

@bold: This is don't by both sides usually and I don't agree with both of them. One doesn't believe in God, fine. One believes in God, also fine. There's nothing to insult/abuse the persons who do/do not believe in God and I find many doing that when it comes to any topic that involves religion. I find the topic of religion just useless as what is the excuse to quote a religion for any kind of event/crime? Those people who commit crimes are simply inhuman/bad people who don't have the right to talk about God as they believe in the opposite.

So many protestants started forcing their belief on me and I simply ignored them and then they began criticizing me because I don't believe what they believe in. It's just insanity.

I believe in God and no matter if I am called anything, I will still believe in him. That's my belief and I will stand with it no matter what.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
May 15, 2015, 06:46:15 AM
Correct. I've recently also put that user to ignore.

I've had him on ignore for over a year and he has no clue. lol  I see him posting away in a futile attempt to brainwash me.

All you can do is feel sorry for him.  His parents never gave him a chance, just like they were probably never given a chance.  Sad
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
May 15, 2015, 01:34:57 AM
Well, no god or gods have ever made their existence known to me. I have heard people claim that they are in regular contact but I only have their word for it. To me it´s only hearsay. In any event if this god or gods really had ever communicated with priests or prelates or any holy men, which claim to be kind of representatives of these deities  - there would presumably have been at least a rough estimate agreed upon as to their number. But there are virtually countless gods according to the believers and all the priestcraft of diverse religions  and tons of versions of the same supposed god even. Which obviously means that there is no god or gods or if they exist they haven´t yet bothered to make their existence known to humans. Amen and qumen.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
May 15, 2015, 01:21:42 AM
gangz - while I haven't been able to read from the user above me for over a year, I know from seeing quotes that he is one of the theists/cult members I warned you about.

Is he claiming his god is the true god? delusion
Is he claiming everyone else in the world is wrong? delusion
Is he claiming he knows better than science? delusion
Is he making statements told to him by his parent's which he can't back up?  brainwashing

He is a perfect example of why atheists don't get along with theists.  We understand everyone has their own belief, while they believe their belief is THE belief.  (understand?  lol)  They attempt to push their beliefs on us, while we believe everyone has the right to their own beliefs.  conflict/hate

Just ignore people like him (like I do) and the conflict/hate will go away.  Smiley
Correct. I've recently also put that user to ignore. Anyone who can't properly lead a discussion and use arguments should be ignored. Why should I waste my time trying to prove something to a deluded person?
He will either go into a defensive stance and defend theists while saying that "god" is love, everything and whatnot. delusion  ;or he will put atheists and theists in the same bag.
This is actually quite simple to understand. They believe that their belief is 'the truth', while it isn't based on anything aside from fairy tales written in some random book.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
May 14, 2015, 10:22:01 PM
gangz - while I haven't been able to read from the user above me for over a year, I know from seeing quotes that he is one of the theists/cult members I warned you about.

Is he claiming his god is the true god? delusion
Is he claiming everyone else in the world is wrong? delusion
Is he claiming he knows better than science? delusion
Is he making statements told to him by his parent's which he can't back up?  brainwashing

He is a perfect example of why atheists don't get along with theists.  We understand everyone has their own belief, while they believe their belief is THE belief.  (understand?  lol)  They attempt to push their beliefs on us, while we believe everyone has the right to their own beliefs.  conflict/hate

Just ignore people like him (like I do) and the conflict/hate will go away.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
May 14, 2015, 10:05:07 PM
Seems like there's extremists on both sides, Atheists that will argue with priests and priests who will argue back. They're both fucking crazy  Grin

Atheists use facts.  Theists use beliefs.  Only one is crazy, and you are either one or the other!  Smiley
Where do you find atheists? Where do you find theists? In the same places - on the job, driving cars and trucks etc., at school, in the libraries, in the shopping centers, at the movie theaters. There are even a few atheists in churches on Sunday for one reason or another.

The point? Atheists and theists use the same things. The only difference is their focus.


Quote
Every person had their own "god" inside their own mind. (Yes, you could claim there are over seven billion gods in the world.)  Atheists call it our consciousness. However, most theists are vain and believe their god can influence things outside of their own mind.  That's where the conflict comes in - with atheists and with each other.  Theists can't even decide on what heaven would be like, because each one has people they do and don't want there.  So obviously heaven exists just within your mind as well.
The point is, both atheists and theists don't know for a fact that God exists or doesn't exist, or that God can or can't affect things outside or inside the minds of any people. Their differing focus is in how they believe, making atheism a religion just like theists have their religions.

Deciding on what Heaven is like or is not like is simply a slightly greater focus on an opinion that Heaven does exist, while others are of the opinion that Heaven does not exist.


Quote
As an atheist I know your god is limited to your brain, so it doesn't bother me what you believe.  I don't hate religion, but I do feel sorry for their brainwashed cult members, and it does bother me when they try and push their ignorance on other people.  

Here's a hint to Theists:  The majority of people in the world do not believe what you believe!  Take the hint!

As a thinking, reasoning person, it is easy to see that proof for or against the existence of God is a difficult thing to find. And understanding this proves that atheism is at least near religion, if not in fact religion. However, I do respect the atheist's right to his/her beliefs.

Smiley
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
May 14, 2015, 09:30:22 PM
Seems like there's extremists on both sides, Atheists that will argue with priests and priests who will argue back. They're both fucking crazy  Grin

Atheists use facts.  Theists use beliefs.  Only one is crazy, and you are either one or the other!  Smiley

Every person had their own "god" inside their own mind. (Yes, you could claim there are over seven billion gods in the world.)  Atheists call it our consciousness. However, most theists are vain and believe their god can influence things outside of their own mind.  That's where the conflict comes in - with atheists and with each other.  Theists can't even decide on what heaven would be like, because each one has people they do and don't want there.  So obviously heaven exists just within your mind as well.

As an atheist I know your god is limited to your brain, so it doesn't bother me what you believe.  I don't hate religion, but I do feel sorry for their brainwashed cult members, and it does bother me when they try and push their ignorance on other people.  

Here's a hint to Theists:  The majority of people in the world do not believe what you believe!  Take the hint!
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
May 14, 2015, 09:23:18 PM
Seems like there's extremists on both sides, Atheists that will argue with priests and priests who will argue back. They're both fucking crazy  Grin
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
May 14, 2015, 08:44:05 PM
I'll make it easier for you. If belief equals '1', in that an affirmative statement towards the existence of something is held to be true by the theist, the atheist position is not '-1', it is still '0' because the atheist is not asserting the existence or non-existence of anything, the atheist is rejecting the theist assertion, he is not disproving it. There is no need to disprove because the theist is the one who is making a claim towards the existence of something and that claim is invalid.
QFT in science this concept is known as "burden of proof" and it means he who makes the claim must provide the supporting evidence.
Religions are failed sciences, so naturally they're losing every philosophical and ethical battle to science proper. It's only a matter of time now. Since the birth of the internet religion has become a dead thing walking.



Religion offers a Perfect Answer to end all questions, it's the intellectual equivalent of closing a door. Every question in science leads to still more questions, this is why science survives and thrives while religion wanes toward irrelevance.


Religions are not failed sciences, simply for the fact that science and the scientific method are failed sciences. After all, what is the real goal of science? Of course, it is different for every person/scientist (some want to use it to benefit humanity, others to take over the world, all to live at least a reasonable personal life).

Science will never get to the goal it is looking for. Why not? Because the universe is too large for science to achieve any real coherence within its various fields of endeavor. Only religion can do that.

If you are going to contest what I have written here, be my guest. But come back with something serious when science proves that it has allowed people to live for 200 years in good health... better, 500 years... or a thousand years.

Long before science can do this, religion will have proven itself to be true as mankind nears destroying the earth, and Jesus God returns in glory as He has said He would.

Smiley

1) The scientific method is perfect, it just has limitations.  Philosophy and logic in general don't have such limitations and accordingly have greater scope.  But you have no desire to learn how or why.  You *could* learn about how and why so you don't keep making dumbass statements which, after hundreds of posts, indicate you still have no idea what the scientific method is, how it works, why it works, and why it works perfectly within the boundaries of its scope.

2) Religion isn't epistemology.  It's a belief system.  It's not even comparable.  Religon is not a method which leads to knowledge acquisition.  Again, its a belief system. Different religions are derived from various epistemological roots (e.g. "Read the Bible because the Bible is true") but it's the epistemology which must be evaluate for its rigor, not the religion itself.

3) The size of the Universe has nothing to do with science's inability to form a comprehensive explanatory model of reality.  Instead, it's limited by the rules of inductive reasoning which do not permit such explanations.

4) Consider yourself contested and defeated.  Care to contest what I said?  And by "contest," I don't mean just disagreeing.  I mean, can you actually provide reasons?

5) Way to equate "religion" with "Chrisianity" and ignore every other religion.  

1. The scientific method is perfect with regard to itself. No limitations. But that is all it has. What's the matter. Do you have problems recognizing the truth, so you attempt to do character assassinations of my understandings which are, obviously, way beyond your simplistic thinking?

2. Science is a belief system. The scientific method simply describes the details of science. Thus science, at least the way that it is expressed, is a religion. It is a weak religion, because by the time that it finishes what it is attempting to do, the whole universe will have crumbled to beyond dust, through entropy.

3. I would consider science a much better tool than that, as long as it remains in truthful expression.

4. You might prove things to many people. But if you do, it is only because they are willing to accept what you "evidence" to them as proof.

5. Actually, Christianity is not really religion. It is reality. The way scientific knowledge is exaggerated in the expressions of scientists and politicians, science is one of the biggest religions out there, surpassed only by atheism.

Smiley

1) Blah blah blah, hot air and no actual point.  I love how you claim I have "simplistic thinking" when you don't actually provide any reasons for your own statements.

2) No.  *Empiricism* is a belief system.  Science is an empirical *method.*  The scientific method is in no way a belief system.

3)  It *must* remain truthful by acknowledging its limitations at every turn, especially in the conclusion section.  No problem here.  If it didn't, it wouldn't be good scientific practice.

4)  It's called "margin-of-error," and *every* scientific conclusion has one.  No problem, here.  There is no person more humble or cautious about a conclusion than a good scientist, for it is his duty to explicitly describe where scientific experiments have points of weakness.

5) What kind of fucking moron do you have to be to create a belief system in which you think an actual religion isn't one, and a total non-religion is one?  Here we go again.  This type of thinking meets the criteria for psychosis.  I'm not kidding.

Can you possibly frame your beliefs using the words everyone else uses?  No?  Of course not, because you have no clue what you're talking about.

I'm going to create a thread where I do nothing but quote you and show your own quotes directly contradict yourself.  Out of curiosity, how would you plan to wiggle out and explain your own contradictions, such as saying "religion will be shown to be true" and "Christianity isn't even a religion"?  Furthermore, how so you intend to reconcile several dozen of these types of contradictory quotes?

(Chuckle.)

C'mon, now. Relax. You are losing the connection between your soul and your brain, and your corpus callosum is turning into hemorrhoids.

 Cheesy

Says the guy who thinks an inductive fallacy is about poor electrical semiconductors.

TKO.

Well, it could be if the transformer was shorting. Is your transformer shorting? 

 Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 331
Merit: 250
May 14, 2015, 04:41:13 PM
The christian's heaven is a joke.  I couldn't imagine sharing it with people like Osama Bin Laden.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_JoE2GioXY
Wouldn't it be better to go to hell? We'd have all the awesome guys and chicks there. The best part of it all is that Lauda is going to be there too.  Wink

This thread is going out of control. This has already happened to a few threads with similar topics. The deluded people won't give in no matter what one presents them with, hence they are deluded.

It's hard for me to tell if the religious nuts on here are trolling or not. You'd think being involved in bitcoin would make them a little more enlightened.

Theists are the ones who reject atheists much more.

That's because they get hurt when their belief system is threatened and can't help but chime in, whereas Atheists tend to not really care or just discredit their opinion as nonsense whilst religious people have to continually defend themselves (and always poorly when it's vs reason and science).

How does working with new currency make you "enlightened"?
Jump to: