Why do people still play dice? - page 20.

Bardman

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 516

Quote from: Hexcoin on August 14, 2015, 03:28:06 AM

Quote from: subSTRATA on August 14, 2015, 03:16:40 AM

Quote from: tsoPANos on August 12, 2015, 03:47:15 PM

Why is this thread still active?
Dice is addicting. End of story....

i really dont see whats so addicting about dice, its boring if anything. all there is is high/low and you get to change the multiplier.

addicting for some users as they can see the result of their bet in just a second and so on. but personally for me, i dont like dice and sometimes just to kill boredom i play it

Thats ridiculous and i dont believe it, no one plays dice just to kill boredom, if you play dice withiout any money being involved i would be really really surprised.

JLynn171

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 250

Instant and faster money wins Grin

ndnh

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1005

New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit

Quote from: Hexcoin on August 14, 2015, 03:28:06 AM

Quote from: subSTRATA on August 14, 2015, 03:16:40 AM

Quote from: tsoPANos on August 12, 2015, 03:47:15 PM

Why is this thread still active?
Dice is addicting. End of story....

i really dont see whats so addicting about dice, its boring if anything. all there is is high/low and you get to change the multiplier.

addicting for some users as they can see the result of their bet in just a second and so on. but personally for me, i dont like dice and sometimes just to kill boredom i play it

You got full control. Pick any odds or any multiplier, and your balance changes in a click.

jpouza

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1116

Quote from: btccashacc on August 14, 2015, 03:19:31 AM

Quote from: creepland on August 14, 2015, 03:10:46 AM

I played it to make profit i think i can make good profit un short time. But when I started getting normal profit at the end all time am losting it all..

you must stop if you get profit
that safer than you play again

that is a problem...people always wants more.

Hexcoin

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: subSTRATA on August 14, 2015, 03:16:40 AM

Quote from: tsoPANos on August 12, 2015, 03:47:15 PM

Why is this thread still active?
Dice is addicting. End of story....

i really dont see whats so addicting about dice, its boring if anything. all there is is high/low and you get to change the multiplier.

addicting for some users as they can see the result of their bet in just a second and so on. but personally for me, i dont like dice and sometimes just to kill boredom i play it

ashfaq

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: btccashacc on August 14, 2015, 03:19:31 AM

Quote from: creepland on August 14, 2015, 03:10:46 AM

I played it to make profit i think i can make good profit un short time. But when I started getting normal profit at the end all time am losting it all..

you must stop if you get profit
that safer than you play again

that is what people dont understand,they gamble until the moment their balance reaches to 30% and then "whats the point in going away with 30%"
and they max bet loll...and what do u expect (RED) ....LMAO

btccashacc

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Quote from: creepland on August 14, 2015, 03:10:46 AM

I played it to make profit i think i can make good profit un short time. But when I started getting normal profit at the end all time am losting it all..

you must stop if you get profit
that safer than you play again

subSTRATA

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1043

:^)

Quote from: tsoPANos on August 12, 2015, 03:47:15 PM

Why is this thread still active?
Dice is addicting. End of story....

i really dont see whats so addicting about dice, its boring if anything. all there is is high/low and you get to change the multiplier.

creepland

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

I played it to make profit i think i can make good profit un short time. But when I started getting normal profit at the end all time am losting it all..

ndnh

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1005

New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit

Quote from: dooglus on August 12, 2015, 12:36:41 PM

Quote from: ndnh on August 12, 2015, 12:29:44 PM

Quote from: dooglus on August 12, 2015, 12:11:42 PM

The first person to roll 30 or more losing bets in a row at 50.0000% on Just-Dice gets a 1 BTC or 80 CLAM prize, no strings attached.

1 in around 1,451,590,215 rolls? Shocked

Dang!

That's how often losing streaks of length 30 or more come up if you play at 50.5%.

ashfaq is talking about playing at 50%, and so that's the chance you have to play at to qualify for the prize I'm offering.

It's 1 in 1,073,741,824, since losing at 50% is a bit easier than losing at 50.5%.

Showing my working:

>>> 1 / (1 - 50.5/100) ** 30
1451590214.9428499

>>> 1 / (1 - 50.0/100) ** 30
1073741824.0

Note: this is why I wrote this a while back:

Quote from: dooglus on August 12, 2015, 01:29:20 AM

it should only happen about once per BILLION rolls.

1 / (1 - 50.5/100) ** 30
1451590214.9428499

It should be:
1/(0.505^30) [or 1 / (50.5/100) ** 30]
= 796633667.012
i.e.
1 in 796633667 rolls.

For that, 1073741824 is the right one of course.
I had calculated the win odds instead of the lose odds, but you didn't find that. Grin

ashfaq

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: tsoPANos on August 12, 2015, 03:47:15 PM

Why is this thread still active?
Dice is addicting. End of story....

thats what .. just drop it ..

ashfaq

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: dooglus on August 12, 2015, 02:33:40 PM

Quote from: ashfaq on August 12, 2015, 02:01:04 PM

i cant state more clearly..if u ever understand the question u can PM me ....

This is honestly the best you can do?

Quote

why dont i get 20 rolls below 50 when i play 70% i get the opposite sequence of the multiplier or the method i choose

Let me help. The following is closer to English. Is it what you intended?

Quote

Why don't I get 20 rolls below 50 when I play 70%? I get the opposite sequence of the multiplier or the method I choose.

You will always get 20 rolls below 50 if you play at 70% for long enough. On average it will take about 40 rolls to get 20 under 50, since half of them will be under 50. I can't figure out what you mean by "opposite sequence of the multiplier" or "the method I choose". I expect you could clarify your terms if you wanted to. Am I to assume that your "dice is rigged lol" argument was simply trolling and when challenged you want to run away? It's OK if that's the case.

doog what else do u expect,already quoted 4 times and cant explain more,u can understand if u concentrate once more maybe and answer if u get it.

tsoPANos

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

In math we trust.

Why is this thread still active?
Dice is addicting. End of story....

ashfaq

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: arallmuus on August 12, 2015, 02:20:25 PM

Quote from: ashfaq on August 12, 2015, 02:01:04 PM

@aramallus take it easy man u seriously need to calm a bit.

I was trying to help and thats it but it seems you dont want to be helped

when i am in need of help i will surely ask you as of now this is neither my POST and neither it has any importance to me so i just cant discuss it day and night ...but the question is do u want to help me ?in that case i will be very happy to ask u when i get stuck.

dooglus

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1333

Quote from: ashfaq on August 12, 2015, 02:01:04 PM

i cant state more clearly..if u ever understand the question u can PM me ....

This is honestly the best you can do?

Quote

why dont i get 20 rolls below 50 when i play 70% i get the opposite sequence of the multiplier or the method i choose

Let me help. The following is closer to English. Is it what you intended?

Quote

Why don't I get 20 rolls below 50 when I play 70%? I get the opposite sequence of the multiplier or the method I choose.

You will always get 20 rolls below 50 if you play at 70% for long enough. On average it will take about 40 rolls to get 20 under 50, since half of them will be under 50. I can't figure out what you mean by "opposite sequence of the multiplier" or "the method I choose". I expect you could clarify your terms if you wanted to. Am I to assume that your "dice is rigged lol" argument was simply trolling and when challenged you want to run away? It's OK if that's the case.

arallmuus

legendary

Activity: 2562

Merit: 1414

Quote from: ashfaq on August 12, 2015, 02:01:04 PM

@aramallus take it easy man u seriously need to calm a bit.

Umm sorry what? I didnt even reply to any of the post here anymore as Dooglus is already here to shed some lights with all this delusion Cheesy

. Im calm and there is nothing that hype me as I've seen this kinda stuff like almost 1 time each 2 days in this gambling board .

I knew what you have stated is pretty much impossible and I posted that post not because Im angry or whatever you think about it but mostly it is to encourage you to change your mindset as I was thinking the same thing like you are now back then before I knew about provably fair

. I was trying to help and thats it but it seems you dont want to be helped as you keep ignoring facts despite that you have been shown a thorough explanation with math

Now the question would be where do you usually play dice at? Perhaps you played it in a rigged site though

ashfaq

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

i cant state more clearly..if u ever understand the question u can PM me ....
and its ok nvm i didnt started this topic, @aramallus take it easy man u seriously need to calm a bit.

dooglus

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1333

Quote from: ashfaq on August 12, 2015, 01:26:44 PM

doog u still dont get my point ,i mean why dont i get 20 rolls below 50 when i play 70% i get the opposite sequence of the multiplier or the method i choose Huh

You're asking why you don't get such long losing streaks when you play with a higher chance of winning? When you have a 70% chance of winning each roll, you only have a 30% chance of losing each roll, and so the chance of getting long losing streaks is lower. I somehow don't think that's really what you are asking about though, because it seems too obvious.

Please try to state your question clearly.

Did you ever play at Just-Dice? If so, tell me your user number and I will take a look at your betting history. We'll see how many times you rolled under 50 and over 50, and see that they're probably about the same, for instance. Maybe with a concrete dataset we can more easily pinpoint the problem you're having.

Quote from: Bardman on August 12, 2015, 01:30:34 PM

No, i dont think so because it requires a high amount of money even starting at 1 satoshi to hit 30 in a row you would need a ton of money, thats why is really rare, of course dice sites have a ton of bets but really almost no one is betting like that, 1 satoshi bet and doubling 30 times.

Forget about doubling. The stake doesn't change the outcome. Any 30 losses at 50% is just as unlikely as any other, no matter whether people are doubling their stakes or not.

Bardman

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 516

Quote from: ndnh on August 12, 2015, 12:56:35 PM

Quote from: dooglus on August 12, 2015, 12:44:59 PM

Quote from: Dennis7777 on August 12, 2015, 12:37:58 PM

Another way to look at it: Since 0 satoshi bets are delayed by 0.3 seconds on JD, the average time needed with non-stop betting would be 2^30*0.3s = 3728 days. Tongue

That's right!

If you want to be clicking the 'hi' button for the next 10 years to win a free 1 BTC, be my guest!

Well, if Just-Dice gets a few million rolls per day, it is quite probably that someone will hit it, may be twice a year. Grin

No, i dont think so because it requires a high amount of money even starting at 1 satoshi to hit 30 in a row you would need a ton of money, thats why is really rare, of course dice sites have a ton of bets but really almost no one is betting like that, 1 satoshi bet and doubling 30 times.

ashfaq

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

doog u still dont get my point ,i mean why dont i get 20 rolls below 50 when i play 70% i get the opposite sequence of the multiplier or the method i choose Huh

Topic: Why do people still play dice? - page 20. (Read 22294 times)