i dont care what dooglus says earlier and what he says now because he owns a dice site and his opinion is not considered or as equal as a gambler atleast and plus my point was the way the algorithm of these dice sites is designed is like there is a 50/50 chance to win at 50/50 i.e a 2x multiplier for 1 single roll and there is 30% chance of winning at the same 2x multiplier for 100000 rolls and as u keep on rolling the chances keep on decrease that is why in the long run the casinos win .
It's true that
once we saw a losing streak of length 32 at 49.5% on Just-Dice. People play at 49.5% quite a lot. People almost never play at 50%, and that's why we didn't see a losing streak of length 30 at 50.0% yet.
I'm not stating my opinion here. I am stating facts. I am also offering you free money if you can back up your statement that you always get 30 losses in a row at 50%.
What does "there is 30% chance of winning at the same 2x multiplier for 100000 rolls" even mean? Every 50% roll has a 50% chance of winning. All your rolls are predetermined. You get to pick 'hi' or 'lo' after the roll has already been decided, and so like calling heads or tails on a coin toss you have a 50% chance of calling correctly. I don't really understand how you can think it works any differently. If you can explain in more detail how you think the house can change the chance of you guessing a 50/50 result correctly, then maybe I can figure out where you're going wrong in your thought process.
doog u only took the half statement and quoted on it ,i wish if u have read the full sentence.
I try to only quote the parts of messages that I am replying to. I dislike the practice of quoting a big long message and only addressing part of it. But as you wish, here's your whole sentence:
well buddy dont want to argue on this but , if the numbers r not tampered then why do i always get 30 reds at 50% chance while martingale and never got more than 10 reds while manually playing any other multiplier ??
The 2nd part of the sentence claims that you never lost more than 10 bets in a row when playing any chance other than 50%? If that's true, I guess you must be either not playing other chances very often, or when you do, you play at a relatively high chance. If you play at 1% you will almost always get losing streaks longer than 10 in a row for instance. I'm not sure what you want me to say about this 2nd part of your sentence. My main criticism was that you claim to "always get 30 reds at 50%", and that isn't true. To show that it isn't true I offered to pay you 1 BTC if you can show it happening even once on Just-Dice. Then I extended the offer to everyone else as well.
Well, if Just-Dice gets a few million rolls per day, it is quite probably that someone will hit it, may be twice a year.
We've had about 3/4 of a million bets in about 3/4 of a year. So we should expect to see 30 losses in a row at 50% about once per year, assuming everyone bets at 50%. But they don't. Nobody bets at 50%...
