It's okay. At this point, if you're still reading this thread, you've likely come to grand new conclusions which have tested your prior understanding of reality, and indeed who you are yourself. Things make sense for the first time: the struggle, the suffering or perhaps the days-in and days-out of mind-numbing boredom, none of them are anything more than illusions, holograms - a collective of minds.
Don't withdraw from your friends. Accept everyone else around you who doesn't know this truth. Try to show them the way. You will find, everyone does know, they just deal with it in certain ways.
On a scale from Alex Jones to Kanye West, there is an undercurrent you've just been taken by.
Topic: Why does bitcoin hate fiat money so much? (Read 4841 times)
fiat money is a system of slavery where by those who print the money get to diminish your wealth for their own ends and there is nothing you can do about it
Those who print the money are your betters. Be a good randian and give them respect, adoration & slavish obedience that is their due., pl0x.
fiat money is a system of slavery where by those who print the money get to diminish your wealth for their own ends and there is nothing you can do about it
I see now; so it's not a matter of issuing coins, it's a matter of issuing any money with resemblance to other money. So this is why legal advisers exist 
As a practical matter, von NotHaus was prosecuted because he encouraged counterfeiting -- it was part of his business model. As a legal matter, I wouldn't suggest issuing metal coins that are intended to circulate as money for general use. For more details, see http://www.dictocracy.com/libertydollar/commentary/pdfs/1164570384.pdf 
The LD was counterfeit. If someone tried to pass off physical BTC as "current money", or encouraged others to do so, they'd run afoul of the law too.
I see now; so it's not a matter of issuing coins, it's a matter of issuing any money with resemblance to other money. So this is why legal advisers exist
Now this has me curious; if it applies to the LD, why not physical BTC?
The LD was counterfeit. If someone tried to pass off physical BTC as "current money", or encouraged others to do so, they'd run afoul of the law too. ...
Now this has me curious; if it applies to the LD, why not physical BTC?
Now this has me curious; if it applies to the LD, why not physical BTC?
Because Chuck E Cheese's also minted their own coins, and the rat was not sentenced to any jail time. Friends in high places, i suppose.
Gob'ment>>
The point is the man did decide to issue coins, running afoul of 18 USC § 486.
If you are interested in deeper understanding, such as the reasoning behind this law, i'm sure adult education classes are available.
If you are interested in deeper understanding, such as the reasoning behind this law, i'm sure adult education classes are available.
I'm not interested in the topic enough to drop the cash, but thanks for the advice.
Anyhow, doing a little more research on the topic, it seems issuing a private currency is not completely illegal, but due to the USD being subsidized, and the restrictions placed upon anyone but the U.S. Feds issuing cash, it's just not feasible for a private currency to reach national usage; it's the same reason why private entities don't rise to take the work the government provides.
More topically, didn't someone produce actual physical Bitcoins?
Were they made of metal?
Were they made of metal?
Now this has me curious; if it applies to the LD, why not physical BTC?
More topically, didn't someone produce actual physical Bitcoins?
Were they made of metal?
Were they made of metal?
i'm sure adult education classes are available.
owned. For issuing coins. That section does not prohibit issuing paper currency.
Very strange; so, if the man decided not to issue the coins, but instead set it up so the bills could be swapped for PMs, it would then have been legal?
Why are coins targeted specifically?
The point is the man did decide to issue coins, running afoul of 18 USC § 486.
If you are interested in deeper understanding, such as the reasoning behind this law, i'm sure adult education classes are available.
Why are coins targeted specifically?
if they have the same size a fiat coins, you really have to look at them, to know the difference. where the giant face of an old and long gone president on a piece of paper is way more recognizable.its easier to trick people to accept 'wrong' coins.
just my guess.
For issuing coins. That section does not prohibit issuing paper currency.
Very strange; so, if the man decided not to issue the coins, but instead set it up so the bills could be swapped for PMs, it would then have been legal?
Why are coins targeted specifically?
My guess is that it dates back to when the worth of the coin was the metal it was made out of, rather than it simply being an alternative form of IOU.
For issuing coins. That section does not prohibit issuing paper currency.
Very strange; so, if the man decided not to issue the coins, but instead set it up so the bills could be swapped for PMs, it would then have been legal?
Why are coins targeted specifically?
Upon reading the title of this thread, I couldn't help but wonder why rocks hate moving water.
i was going to say "why rocks hate vegetables" but this will suffice
If you sell a stolen car, you can describe the prosecution as being for, ultimately, "selling a car". But that kind of ignores the fact that the car was stolen. The key fact is that von NotHaus was counterfeiting US currency and this fact was key to his prosecution.
Quote
Whoever, except as authorized by law, makes or utters or passes, or attempts to utter or pass, any coins of gold or silver or other metal, or alloys of metals, intended for use as current money, whether in the resemblance of coins of the United States or of foreign countries, or of original design, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
It wouldn't have mattered if the currency looked alien, he was prosecuted for issuing a currency.
For issuing coins. That section does not prohibit issuing paper currency.
If you sell a stolen car, you can describe the prosecution as being for, ultimately, "selling a car". But that kind of ignores the fact that the car was stolen. The key fact is that von NotHaus was counterfeiting US currency and this fact was key to his prosecution.
Quote
Whoever, except as authorized by law, makes or utters or passes, or attempts to utter or pass, any coins of gold or silver or other metal, or alloys of metals, intended for use as current money, whether in the resemblance of coins of the United States or of foreign countries, or of original design, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
It wouldn't have mattered if the currency looked alien, he was prosecuted for issuing a currency.
There is a little more to it than that.
That explains his conviction for paper-based money.
He would have been convicted for his coins anyway, it is illegal to coin your own currency, even if it clearly different to USD.
That explains his conviction for paper-based money.
He would have been convicted for his coins anyway, it is illegal to coin your own currency, even if it clearly different to USD.
That doesn't matter; the point is, there was a private currency, and the U.S. Government shut it down, ultimately for the reason explained: "making, possessing, and selling his own currency". It is illegal under federal law to print your own currency.
If you sell a stolen car, you can describe the prosecution as being for, ultimately, "selling a car". But that kind of ignores the fact that the car was stolen. The key fact is that von NotHaus was counterfeiting US currency and this fact was key to his prosecution.
Mileage plus miles...
Jump to: