looking for reasons of speculative market is not what i do. i look at the base value stuff that supports things that stop a market plunging into darkness
and looking at the economics of stuff that create the top premium resistance that forms the tipping point of an ATH
all the random reasoning of sentiment and speculation in between of the speculative market .. just becomes social dramas of guessing games
but lets delve into the theory of the ATH speculative reasoning of your stimulus theory
did you check the reasons for the 2011 ATH
did you check the reasons for the 2013 ATH
did you check the reasons for the 2017 ATH
those were not caused by stimulus cheques
yes you could see an uptick in volume on a couple months(ish) of a couple stimulus dates
but that volume is in no where comparison to the 2017-18 volumes
by this i mean lets say
all 250m adult americans did
put some stimulus cheques into bitcoin
they are only putting in a fraction of the $1.2k
250m * lets say $500 =$125b per round
3 rounds in a year =$375b a year volume
exchanges do far more volume over all, than what i calculated as a $375b per year 'stimulus volume'
where even that $375b per year stimulus volume was an exaggeration of all adult americans investing 42% of their cheques
here is the funny
the price in march2020 did peak to $8k. but it also dropped days later(mid march) to under $6k
and yet that march period(pre-stimulus) was the highest volume of trading occurring in 2020-2021
which you cant explain as a stimulus cheque caused high volume event..
the first stimulus of april-may 2020 had no price impact
(yes it had mid-high volume compared to lets say the 2021 volume)
then the december-jan(high volume) stimulus
and march 2021 stimulus was the first peak of a ATH (stimulus 2&3)
but the july 2021-november 2021 was the peak of a ATH with no stimulus period inside those dates
where by first stimulus round didnt see much uptick in volume or price
yes second and third round coincided with the first price ramp up.
but doesnt explain the second ramp up in price from july onwards
which seem too flimsy of a correlation to try to theorise causation
however here is a better theory, which has a test of time proof of over 12 years
so here it is:
with each major price discovery event follows a year later by a ATH
price discover events year later
2010-first exchange : ATH 2011
2012-halving event : ATH 2013
2016-halving event : ATH 2017
2020-halving event : ATH 2021