The same thing with FIAT and also commercial bank whereas there are tons of robbery for the bank. This is pretty much double standards, which you cant compare both because both bear a risk where you could lose it. Even if you take precautions on what necessary needed there will still be a risk for you to bear
P.S : Im more into securing it by my owns and even if I lost it , that would be my sole fault ( much better than entrusting it to a third party and lose them all the same )
with bank you have your ass covered a bit, against robbery, insolvency ecc.. they only need to display a magical number and then cover you when somoeone else will deposit in their bank, basically like a legal ponzi..
Indeed it was all the same actually unless you forgot that there are alot of news that bank announced their bankruptcy. Also that I hadnt heard anything about bank covering money that you lost against robbery or credit card fraud.
You need fiat to buy bitcoin and you don't need bitcoin to buy a fiat.
It seems like you dont think twice before posting this. Everyone that traded their
BTC into FIAT could be considered as "purchasing" FIAT anyway. Also that a trade is a two way activity , if you are selling bitcoin for FIAT then on the same time there will be someone purchasing it with FIAT
Merchants and buyers are yet not prepared to use BTC.
They are ready to use it but the problem would be that they will need to convert it back to FIAT at some point because
BTC alone cant help them with their business. This will be another reason why
BTC is a slave of FIAT for now, because in the end you can stand alone with only
BTC in your hands
Also, they are not sure about how much is it actually worth and how it would be tomorrow.
There are alot of payment system that auto convert price in your currency into
BTC for the current value at the time you do a purchase , so its not a big deal and not a reason why
BTC is still a slave of FIAT