Topic: Why is there such an insurgence of flat-earthers in 2015? - page 11. (Read 29814 times)

Thought for the day: Why can't you use your cell phone on plane rides? Is it because it would be bouncing off of cell towers you have no right being near?

FAA allowing most electronic device use throughout flights

"The FAA had long claimed that using electronic devices during takeoff and landing posed a safety issue and that radio signals from the devices could interfere with an aircraft's communications, navigation and other systems.

But a panel the FAA established last year to study the issue concluded that most commercial airplanes can tolerate radio interference signals."


...


"About 69% of passengers traveling with an e-device reported using their devices on a flight, and almost one-third of passengers admitted to accidentally leaving one on in flight, according to a 2013 CEA/Airline Passenger Experience Association study."

You don't have to tell us the bolded, red part, above. We all know that!

 

One person said if you could get 2 boats on the shore of Antarctica, in the ocean, but within view of the shore, and have them go opposite directions, they could measure how long it took to find each other. If Antarctica is as small as they say it should be far shorter. But they also mentioned, if someone did this, one of the boats might get hit by a missile first, lol.

I just don't get why NASA keeps putting out "real photos" of the Earth with things like lettering in the clouds. No cloud I've ever seen has been able to look like an E or an X....

Since Antarctica is locked down tighter than Area 51 and colder than hell I doubt we'll find out but, yeah I'm thinking something along those lines. I doubt they would be in nice even cells like that but the good book likes to claim the Earth was created so who knows for sure.

EDIT:

Somebody might be able to sneak a mini stealth blimp across equipped with a spread spectrum transceiver. Easier said than done however, I suppose a wealthy individual in isolation somewhere might pull it off.

Something like this for infinity in every direction?

I'm keen on the idea that it's an almost infinite frozen plane dotted with many pools warmed by other Suns.

Depends on if you are in a valley or on a mountain.   

If the earth is flat how would it looks like?

Maybe that's the real reason for all the chemtrail spraying. People are getting more and better lenses for their cameras. Also, more and more people are designing radio methods for measuring the "sky." If the earth were flat, or more importantly, if we were on the inside of a sphere, we just might see the truth with our better lenses and radios. The chemtrails place particles into the air that act to produce a haze that our better lenses and radios can't penetrate. Otherwise we might find out the truth.

I've been trying to tell you for a long time about the stuff at http://edge.org/conversation/the-energy-of-empty-space-that-isn-39t-zero.

Our universe is simply one of an untold number (maybe infinite number) of universes separated by a phase shift (dimensional shift) that makes them all fit inside the exact same space. The universes act on each other to produce other universes. An electron in our universe is simply the action of at least two other universes  crossing energies of some sort, that produce an instantaneous electron. The electron, itself, winks in and out in each of its infinite positions in a single revolution of its atom center. Nothing is stationary or stable for even a moment. Time itself is not stable.

Here's the trick. All the instability in the mega-universe produces an illusion of stability in each universe.

What I would like to know is, does each universe hold a single soul? Do our souls each have their own universe? When a man and a woman get together and produce offspring, is a new soul produced, or is a universe-soul already in existence since the Creation simply attached to a set of operating physical energies and materials that are a new human being?

In the Old Testament in the Bible, God says through Isaiah, in chapter 55, at verses 8 and 9:

Yes... we would have missed out on those movies. But if you look at the world as a flat Earth, and there's a dome over us, how likely is it this was created out of nothing? I ask again, don't you think it would lead people to believe in God if this was true? We may have had world peace, or at least a lot less sinning.

---

Re: No REAL images of earth from space (Forum Discussion)


Why, when our cameras are amazing these days, have they not taken a picture of the Earth in decades before snapping this recent one?

Earth takes an 'epic selfie'

"Earth got is first full selfie in decades this month when a satellite sent back this gorgeous shot of our blue planet.

The shot shows the entire sunlit side of Earth from 1.6 million kilometres away, according to Nasa.

It's the first full Earth shot since the astronauts aboard the Apollo 17 snapped a similar one in 1972."

But, but, but...  Think of the wonderful sci-fi stories and movies we would have missed out on if the cosmologists had simply been truthful!

 

"Most cosmologists will not admit it publicly, but perhaps over a beer they would tell you what is happening. Observations over the last 50 years, culminating with the Planck satellite results (March 2013) set modern science on a counter revolution leading closer to ideas formed 500 years ago. Today’s cosmology is based on two broad principles: The Copernican Principle (we are not in a special place in the universe) and the Cosmological Principle (The Copernican Principle, plus isotropy- the view from anywhere in the universe looks about the same). Starting with early studies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), and in recent years culminating with results from the COBE then the WMAP satellites, scientists were faced with a signal at the largest scales of the universe- a signal that pointed right back at us, indicating that we are in a special place in the universe."

"There are cosmologists and scientists who recognize the signal for what it is, and recent articles have started talking about the need for some “new physics” to explain the results. Even on the Planck mission website Professor Efstathiou states:

"'Our ultimate goal would be to construct a new model that predicts the anomalies and links them together. But these are early days; so far, we don’t know whether this is possible and what type of new physics might be needed. And that’s exciting'"

---

NOTABLE HELIOCENTRIST EXPERIMENTS THAT *FAILED* TO DETECT ANY MOVEMENT OF THE EARTH AROUND THE SUN

"There was a group of early "scientists" that decided that their heliocentric pronouncements would be proved and accepted. They conducted various experiments to prove that the earth moves around the sun. Unsurprisingly, these experiments FAILED--and they knew it--but they covered this information up. In their corrupt minds, heliocentrism had to disprove the Bible, no matter what the cost--so instead of being scientific and accepting that the earth does not move, they decided to hold the truth in unrighteousness. They suppressed the truth like any liar would. False science could not and can not prove the motion of the earth because it does not move. It is not a planet ("wanderer"). Those early false scientists are the authors of the textbooks that today's "scientists" and authors consult. The students who have learned from them are worse off than they are (Matthew 23:15) because these students actually believe the earth moves whereas the original false scientists knew that they were wrong."

Just going to point out, that the experiments that were supposed to prove the Earth went around the sun failed, and they had to come up with ideas as to why the experiments failed to prove the Earth went around the sun.

It's not very scientific to want a conclusion, and just run tests until your experiment makes your conclusion work, especially to the point of continuing to come up with reasons why your experiments failed.

---

NASA's Deception - The Earth Does Not Rotate Around The Sun

The Earth, from NASA... Why is the land so brown in one and so green in another?



Do these look like letters?



(It's in the image above, but it was flipped horizontally.)

http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view.php?id=55418
https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/187_1003705_americas_dxm.png

Ow.  The stupidity hurts.  Make it stop.

My discovery that the Earth was flat started right here on BCT. I was in a creative mood and penned a post entitled "Interstellar Radar" in the off-topic section after reading up on the "WOW signal". I grabbed a schematic of the Star Wars Death Star and shopped it from Death Star to Interstellar Radar as I figured that's what the real deal would end up looking like. However I wasn't satisfied, it wasn't enough I needed something more, something bigger. Then it hit me, two Death Stars each one an eyeball socketed in a giant skull constructed on the dark side of the Moon forming a giant stereoscopic radar shielded from RF coming from Earth.

Then something else hit me, I couldn't say for sure what the dark side of Moon really looked like. There's enough evidence that NASA faked the Moon landings to cast doubt on what's really there. I then penned another post in the off-topic section entitled "The Dark Side of the Moon" describing my vision of the giant skull radar. It was then I realized that if NASA faked the Moon landing they could be faking more stuff regarding space and our solar system. I turned to Mars and the images they were claiming were from the rovers. I found lots of anomalies that seemed to indicate they were also faked images but the kicker was the lemming. They were taking images from their Devon Island test site in Canada, running them through an image processor and claiming they were from Mars. I penned another post in the off-topic section entitled "NASA Sucks" as a result of my findings.

Dumfounded that NASA was faking the Moon and Mars I wondered if anything they presented regarding space was true. I looked at the images of Earth from space and sure enough they were fake. The only conclusion I could come to was that they were hiding what our planet really looks like. A few Google searches and I found the guy on theNASAchannel claiming NASA paid him to do photo-realistic artistic renderings of planets and objects in space including the Earth. It became clear at this point that what NASA was hiding was the fact the Earth was flat. I did some more research and to my surprise all the evidence and facts actually pointed to the Earth being flat.

So there you have it, this is how I came to know the Earth is flat.

It's not really that flat-earthers don't believe in science. What it is, is that flat-earthers have figured out that most of expressed science isn't really science, but rather it is science-fiction. Therefore, they are testing the theories of science themselves, to see which are true and which are not.

Actually flat-earthers have asked for proof (other than images from NASA/Elite) that the world is a sphere, and encourage people to try these experiments themselves.

Whereas those who believe in a sphere earth, just say, the scientists and NASA people told me so.

And only you can make you believe in untrue "facts."

Flat Earthers and other conspiracy theorists like climate deniers
are just people with low understanding of our world.
They justify their ignorance by "corrypt world elites"
wich make us believe in untrue facts