Pages:
Author

Topic: Why is using 51% hashing power stronger than using 51% of the people? - page 4. (Read 778 times)

member
Activity: 224
Merit: 62
How do you use 51% of people? How do you determine that someone is a different person from someone else online? Are you going to collect everyone's IDs? Who is going to store those IDs?

Determining individuals is basically impossible to do and is easily gameable by individuals such that some people get more power than others without those others necessarily knowing.

Also, Bitcoin doesn't use 51% mining power for anything except 51% attacks.

filesharing, take a picture of your eye/fingerprint, gg wp. (it is already built into the ardor/bitswift network) The filesharing can check for dupes on the blockchain, so you can only have 1 account, in theory.

here is a eye captcha https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4x0vOAu0lQ
you can do the same with fingerprint

here is the file sharing https://youtu.be/Y7TLFyK_3Pk?t=965 I explain it briefly in this check out www.bitswift.network wallet (login top right).  p2p exchange, file sharing, decentralized voting, asset creation etc.

 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 3213
@OP

You can read all about how an 51% Attack works here : How does a double spend 51% attack work ? Explanation and examples.
There is all explaind.
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
Have you forgotten when FCC flooded themselves with fake comment which don't support net neutrality?
Imagine what would happen if "51% of the people" system is used to run Bitcoin network (or any government activity) Roll Eyes

Reference : https://www.pcmag.com/news/357641/fake-dupe-net-neutrality-comments-flooded-fcc-site
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 2248
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
51% of the total people on the network may not amount to 50%> of the total hashing power, it depends on the amount of energy being expended and computing power.
The idea is not to use any or launch an attack on the network.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 6089
bitcoindata.science
51% of hashing power is also 51% of the total energy.
Energy is something valuable in our world, and will continue to be for as long as we can foreseen.

It is very plausible that the secure of the network is based on that.

51% of people doesn´t make much sense, as you can´t be sure if people are real, like achow101 said.

As I read somewhere in this forum, democracy is vulnerable to 51% attack. People can be bought and manipulated.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 3045
Top Crypto Casino
Hashing power is for hardwares not for humans.

It doesn't matter how many people there are or how many machines you are running. What matters is how powerful these machines are.


Please remove the GIF.
staff
Activity: 3458
Merit: 6793
Just writing some code
How do you use 51% of people? How do you determine that someone is a different person from someone else online? Are you going to collect everyone's IDs? Who is going to store those IDs?

Determining individuals is basically impossible to do and is easily gameable by individuals such that some people get more power than others without those others necessarily knowing.

Also, Bitcoin doesn't use 51% mining power for anything except 51% attacks.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 62
Title says it all

Why is using 51% hashing power stronger than using 51% of the people on the network?
I don`t think it is.



Why not use 51% of the people on the network instead of 51% of the hashing power? in a new Crypto  

I guess fiat morons would just dominate it anyways without time as the medium of exchange same as the current system but instead of buying computers they just buy people.

Pages:
Jump to: