Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin - page 11.

ManOnTheMoon

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Fuck you busoni, you're a fucking cunt.

I hope you die.

Quote from: ht518 on June 16, 2014, 08:51:49 AM

BUSONI,you fucking idiot.you made me lose almost 20 BTC.I do not want to quarrel with you.I ask you to do an offcial apology and add supercoin.you have two days.if I don't see what I want at that time.I will make all my Chinese friends know how stupid you are.As the owner of Poloniex.You do not know how to read the source code.You only know how to sperad fud.I will let all of my friends know Polo is scam through QQ groups and weibo and stop them trading at Polo.This is not a joke.By the way.I have no jobs noly have much time.

maqa71

member

Activity: 80

Merit: 10

Quote from: tx42 on June 16, 2014, 04:04:04 PM

Quote from: maqa71 on June 16, 2014, 02:33:27 PM

READ
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7346573

Maqa must be a scammer. Read this:

http://tinyurl.com/bpmvwp

You finally found out smartass Grin

Maybe bold in RED would been better.
Yes, i create scam coins and tell you all to buy so i can dump on you.

Go crawl back in your cave muppet.

Zer0Sum

legendary

Activity: 1588

Merit: 1000

Quote from: provenceday on June 16, 2014, 02:12:51 PM

they do not realized what they have done to ordinary people.

they also do not know what they have done on Supercoin community.

really fell sorry for this event.

Faster than a speeding bullet...
More powerful than a locomotive
Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound... it's SuperCoin!

Greed will never be the same.
Greed should file a class-action lawsuit.

bitcoinwonders010

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Quote from: deodecagone on June 16, 2014, 04:49:47 PM

looking at all the free hate in this topic. The people invested into SUPER coin only demonstrated what was the only short term future envisionned for SUPER from the beginning.
Hitting a popular exchange and dump. That's it.
If there was only one single thing that was differentiating this coin from any other crap, you wouldn't give a f*** about being listed on poloniex and the price would have increased on the other exchanges already. You would probably discussed rather on how great is the coin. Greed doesn't mean your that you crap coin worths something.

we don't give a shit about being listed on poloniex, but it is perfectly clear that busoni mistake is still affecting super coin, even after it has proven he was wrong. why would we dump on poloniex when we could have been on mintpal

deodecagone

sr. member

Activity: 490

Merit: 250

looking at all the free hate in this topic. The people invested into SUPER coin only demonstrated what was the only short term future envisionned for SUPER from the beginning.
Hitting a popular exchange and dump. That's it.
If there was only one single thing that was differentiating this coin from any other crap, you wouldn't give a f*** about being listed on poloniex and the price would have increased on the other exchanges already. You would probably discussed rather on how great is the coin. Greed doesn't mean your that you crap coin worths something.

Rnbin

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Is this what you people are looking for ?

Quote from: busoni on June 15, 2014, 02:06:28 AM

I would like to point out that I did not personally review the code, as many people seem to think. The person who did has very high standards and was not thrilled with what he saw, and he was overzealous in his criticisms. When I made this post, I firmly believed that the maximum supply was inflated. My intention with going public before contacting the devs was to make sure they did not have a chance to cover up the mistake or take advantage of the issue.

It is my responsibility to ensure that these issues are addressed correctly, so no fingers should be pointed anywhere but at me. I see now that I should have had another reviewer confirm the findings, and investigated sufficiently to make sure I understood all of the code myself before proceeding. I apologize for this misstep. There are still some parts of the code we're concerned about, so our investigations will continue, and I will talk to the devs privately about the anon feature.

This whole raising the standards for coins thing is in an early stage, and we are constantly improving our process. We believe strongly in integrity and transparency, and it has always been my intention to use Poloniex's position to improve the quality of crypto.

By the way, busoni, about time to edit your 'heroic' topic don't you think ? Clear up the fud you created on the first page will you ?

tx42

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: kryptologist on June 16, 2014, 01:19:02 PM

I have to applaud the POLO team for this. You losers just hate that you invested so big in SUPER and ignore that fact that Polo is actually reviewing the code. It's was sketchy code and better to be safe than sorry.

Unfortunately your are a krytpo-ignoramous and not a krypt-ologist.

You don't understand the code at all. MAX_MONEY has no bearing on the "max money". It's just a poorly named variable used for checking the consistency of transactions.

Why do you wish to look so ignorant?

tx42

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: maqa71 on June 16, 2014, 02:33:27 PM

READ
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7346573

Maqa must be a scammer. Read this:

http://tinyurl.com/bpmvwp

badchild

member

Activity: 113

Merit: 10

How long do you need to correct your stupid mistake, busoni?

It has been two days and you just keep silence?

I'm really disappointed with Polo

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Quote from: maqa71 on June 16, 2014, 02:33:27 PM

READ
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7346573

where is your fking logic?

does it mean SUPER is a scam? no, obviously not!

is that excuse for busoni's refusal to admit his stupidity? nope!

bitcoinwonders010

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

simply if you weren't sure you shouldn't have commented. let take whitecoin or was it asiacoin for example that reached to mintpal before the scam was noticed

bitcoinwonders010

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Quote from: maqa71 on June 16, 2014, 02:33:27 PM

READ
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7346573

well that is where ninja coin is a clear scam. now if busoni picked up on that, that would have been awesome, but calling a very good which wa on the rise a scam, is totally unacceptable. all were saying rectify your mistake by saying its not a scam.

maqa71

member

Activity: 80

Merit: 10

READ
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7346573

bitcoinwonders010

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

that is not a apology, did they find anything in the code they were concerned about, if they have no problem with it we won the vote so why are we not added. if you don't want to add us cool, but give a conclusion

provenceday

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1000

Quote from: landslide on June 16, 2014, 01:57:26 PM

Quote from: timerland on June 16, 2014, 01:14:08 PM

Quote from: tx42 on June 16, 2014, 12:57:31 PM

Quote from: timerland on June 16, 2014, 12:48:36 PM

The debacle shows how surprisingly low level an exchange (or its "owner") is. Such ignorance by an exchange owner on the alt coin codebase. He even brave enough to pretend to be an expert of the domain and to make such ridiculous/false claims, and show how stupid he is before the whole community. What an idiot!

GUYS:

It's time to stop bashing poloniex now. They have issued a public apology and clarification (of sorts).

It will be better to advertise this fact.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7319548

I agree we should move forward, but this fiasco caused many people to lose their investment, and the above apology is not enough. They need to give a conclusion of their investigation: is Supercoin good or bad, do they find any issues, if at all? If no issues or no major issues, and since Supercoin was the first in voting list, they should add it to Poloniex, this way they cleared all their mistakes.

But now I don't see conclusions, they have kept the title of this thread, in a very misleading way. This title is translated to "We have rejected a bad coin", but what is bad? Theydid not or can not say anything.

Before this is done, I can't see Busoni's apology is sincere at all. We demand Poloniex give a clear explanation on it!

Agree. Waiting for busoni's reply, and correct that misleading title, the title looks silly to me. Angry

Otherwise back that title with your arguments or facts!

+1

they do not realized what they have done to ordinary people.

they also do not know what they have done on Supercoin community.

really fell sorry for this event.

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ?? on ??

SUM2 will eventually have Anonymous Technology, is that coin invalid also?

SUM2 should be very nervous about their future.

provenceday

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1000

Busoni do not even show up?

landslide

sr. member

Activity: 616

Merit: 251

Quote from: timerland on June 16, 2014, 01:14:08 PM

Quote from: tx42 on June 16, 2014, 12:57:31 PM

Quote from: timerland on June 16, 2014, 12:48:36 PM

The debacle shows how surprisingly low level an exchange (or its "owner") is. Such ignorance by an exchange owner on the alt coin codebase. He even brave enough to pretend to be an expert of the domain and to make such ridiculous/false claims, and show how stupid he is before the whole community. What an idiot!

GUYS:

It's time to stop bashing poloniex now. They have issued a public apology and clarification (of sorts).

It will be better to advertise this fact.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7319548

I agree we should move forward, but this fiasco caused many people to lose their investment, and the above apology is not enough. They need to give a conclusion of their investigation: is Supercoin good or bad, do they find any issues, if at all? If no issues or no major issues, and since Supercoin was the first in voting list, they should add it to Poloniex, this way they cleared all their mistakes.

But now I don't see conclusions, they have kept the title of this thread, in a very misleading way. This title is translated to "We have rejected a bad coin", but what is bad? Theydid not or can not say anything.

Before this is done, I can't see Busoni's apology is sincere at all. We demand Poloniex give a clear explanation on it!

Agree. Waiting for busoni's reply, and correct that misleading title, the title looks silly to me. Angry

Otherwise back that title with your arguments or facts!

andakinas

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

Still waiting for an official statement on Cloak...You know, the coin that got screwed over also because of the FUD from being rejected by poloniex? It did nearly 1000 BTC volume in a day on Bittrex before all the FUD from poloniex detracted investors. Both coins have a more active dev team than 90% of the coins your exchange currently lists. I'm not sure your weeding out the bad coins process is working. How bout you stick to what the users of your exchange desire instead of getting caught up in cryptocurrency politics?

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Quote from: kryptologist on June 16, 2014, 01:19:02 PM

I have to applaud the POLO team for this. You losers just hate that you invested so big in SUPER and ignore that fact that Polo is actually reviewing the code. It's was sketchy code and better to be safe than sorry.

Look at Bittrex for what happens when you don't review code. Ninja coin is meant to have 19 million coins and there are now like 600 million on the exchange and people lost money. Not even worth 1 satoshi anymore. I am pulling all my coins from Bittrex and going all in Polo.

you fking retard.

this is not a matter of reviewing or not reviewing.

this is a matter of guts and balls to admit the mistakes.

intention is good, but that is not excuse for finding further excuses for blunders.

Topic: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin - page 11. (Read 43236 times)